.
Angewandte
Communications
Figure 2. Chiral N-F reagents of types A, B, and C.
brings the N-F reagent into solution, thus allowing catalytic
asymmetric fluoroheterocyclization of various substrates
inclusive of 1,2-dihydronaphthalenes. Conceptually, this cata-
lytic system relies on in situ formation of chiral Selectfluor of
type B (Figure 2), in which the stereogenic elements are
located on the anionic component. In the present reaction, we
found that no reaction occurred when 1a was reacted with
1.5 equivalents of Selectfluor, 1.25 equivalents of NaHCO3,
and 10 mol% of the chiral phosphonic acid (R)-TRIP (3,3’-
bis(2,4,6-triisopropylphenyl)-1,1’-binaphthyl-2,2’-diylhydro-
genphosphate) in hexanes. The use of nitromethane instead of
hexanes induced fluorocarbocyclization, but as expected, this
polar solvent afforded 2a as a racemate. Similarly, the indene
1d did not react upon treatment at room temperature for
24 hours with Selectfluor (1.5 equiv), NaHCO3 (1.5 equiv),
and 10 mol% of (R)-TRIP using hexanes, hexanes/fluoro-
benzene (1:1), or fluorobenzene as solvent.[8]
At this point, we considered a new approach to access
enantioenriched fluorocarbocycles resulting from cation–p
cyclization induced by an electrophilic fluorine source. Our
studies in the racemic series informed us that the critical
components necessary to convert 1a into 2a are the combined
used of nitromethane as the solvent and either Selectfluor or
N-fluoro-2,6-dichloropyridinium triflate as the fluorine
source. These considerations led us to design a new class of
chiral N-F reagents (type C; Figure 2) which are based on the
structural core of Selectfluor with the stereogenic elements on
the dicationic DABCO core. These chiral Selectfluor deriv-
atives are predicted to be more reactive than the type A N-F
reagents and offer a platform to investigate how solubility,
reactivity, and enantiocontrol can be tuned by varying the
R substituents of the DABCO core.
To this end, the chiral N-F reagents (2R,3R)-6a, (2S,3S)-
6b, and (2S,3S)-6c, substituted with phenyl, p-(trifluorome-
thyl)phenyl, and o-toluoyl groups, respectively, were prepared
(Scheme 3). The chiral DABCO (2R,3R)-7a was a necessary
precursor to access (2R,3R)-6a. This compound was assem-
bled from the corresponding enantiopure vicinal diamine
using a protocol disclosed by Oi and Sharpless.[14] N-Quater-
nization of (2R,3R)-7a performed with methyl triflate
afforded (2R,3R)-8a in 97% yield. The subsequent fluorina-
tion was achieved using fluorine gas (10% v/v in N2) in
acetonitrile (Method 1). Extensive optimization varying the
amount of F2, the reaction temperature, and the concentra-
tion was essential to identify reaction conditions which
suppressed indiscriminate fluorination of the aryl groups.
The best reaction conditions offered (2R,3R)-6a in 97%
Scheme 3. Chiral reagents (2R,3R)-6a, (2S,3S)-6b, and (2S,3S)-6c.
DMAP=4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, DMF=N,N-dimethylformamide,
THF=tetrahydrofuran.
yield. Pleasingly, (2R,3R)-6a could also be prepared at room
temperature in acetonitrile using commercially available N-
fluoropentachloropyridinium triflate[15] in the presence of
sodium bicarbonate (Method 2). This latter protocol is
advantageous as it allows in situ formation of chiral Select-
fluor reagents of type C[8] as an alternative to the use of
isolated reagents. The chiral N-F reagents (2S,3S)-6b and
(2S,3S)-6c were prepared in comparable yields by applying
the same reaction sequence.[8]
Asymmetric fluorocyclization of 1d was carried out in the
presence of the chiral N-F reagents (2R,3R)-6a, (2S,3S)-6b,
and (2S,3S)-6c (Table 2).[8] For this study, the reaction solvent
was reconsidered since we suspected that the solubility profile
of the chiral reagents 6a–c might differ from that of
Selectfluor. All reagents mediated the conversion of 1d into
the enantioenriched 2d when the reaction was performed in
nitromethane, with each giving drastically different reactivity
and enantioselectivity (entries 1–3). The reagent (2S,3S)-6b
with the para-electron-withdrawing CF3 substituents on the
aryl rings was the most reactive, as 1d was entirely converted
into 2d (entry 2). Collectively, these experiments demon-
strate that one can tailor the reactivity of this new class of
chiral reagents by varying the steric and electronic properties
of the substituents located at C2 and C3. Pleasingly, (2S,3S)-
6b was also the most effective for enantiocontrol as 2d was
formed in 60% ee. The reagents (2R,3R)-6a and (2S,3S)-6c
gave ee values of 32% and 55%, respectively. Based on this
lead result, all subsequent reactions were performed with
(2S,3S)-6b. The reaction solvent had an influence on yield and
ee value (entry 4–10). The compound 2d was obtained with
81% ee in THF but with a significant decrease in yield
(entry 6). 1,4-Dioxane afforded 2d in 88% yield and 74% ee
(entry 7). The nature of the inorganic base had no effect on
the ee value but substituting NaHCO3 with K2CO3 or Cs2CO3
was detrimental to the yield (entries 12 and 13). Notably, the
ee value was found to be 74% when the reaction was
performed at either 508C or 108C (entries 14 and 15). Thus,
under the optimized reaction conditions, treating 1d with
4
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!