becomes prohibitive. As an alternate approach, Fleming and
co-workers first noted that the addition of silyl anions to
amides afforded acylsilanes, but this process was not
adequately explored as an efficient and less toxic strategy
to construct acylsilanes.17
We were prompted to reexamine various acylsilane
syntheses when trying to prepare acylsilane 3a (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Dithiane Deprotection Complications and
Conversion of Amide 1a to Acylsilane 3aa
Figure 1. Survey of various acylsilane syntheses.
of acylsilanes in one step from the corresponding amide and
an easily prepared silyl anion.
There are numerous synthetic approaches to construct the
carbonyl carbon-silicon bond (Figure 1).7 Unconventional
approaches include the conversion of R,R-dibromobenzyl-
silanes (4) to acylsilanes on silica gel8 and the hydroboration
of silylalkynes (5).9 The trapping of deprotonated dithianes
with chlorosilanes has been employed for decades, but this
strategy always requires the unmasking of the R-silyl dithiane
(6), which is not always compatible with the substrate (vide
infra).10 Additionally, benzotriazol-1-yl phenoxyalkanes are
useful precursors to a variety of acylsilane structures.11 Not
surprisingly, many of these processes are potentially difficult
due to the unavailability of starting materials or their lack
of atom economy.12 R,â-Unsaturated acylsilanes can be
prepared either by a Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reaction
of R-(phosphonoacyl)-silanes13 or the silyl-Wittig rearrange-
ment of allylic alcohols followed by oxidation.14 Interest-
ingly, the palladium-catalyzed conversion of aryl acid
chlorides to aryl acylsilanes has been reported, but this
reaction is limited to the trimethylsilyl group and undergoes
decarbonylation with electron-deficient aromatic systems.15
a Conditions: 1) (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6, aq. NaHCO3, MeCN/CH2Cl2,
-30 °C, 5 min; 2) PhI(OTFA)2, aq. NaHCO3, THF/MeCN, 0 °C,
15 min.
The conventional dithiane approach allowed for the prepara-
tion of gram quantities of dithiane 8, but we were unable to
convert this material to 3a without destroying the terminal
alkene. We wanted to avoid using mercury(II) chloride, due
to the toxicity of mercury and the possible interactions of
the metal with the olefin. A search of the literature yielded
only two reagents for the deprotection of dithianes in the
presence of terminal olefins: ceric ammonium nitrate18 and
[bis(trifluoroacetoxy)-iodo]benzene.19 Unfortunately, the use
of either of these reagents under various conditions did not
afford the desired acylsilane.
We envisioned that a morpholine amide 1a would be a
better acylsilane precursor for 3a and that this approach
would be applicable toward many other acylsilanes. The
direct addition of organometallic reagents to morpholine
amides without over-addition has been reported,20 and this
process is more economical than the corresponding Weinreb
amides.21 Gratifyingly, the addition of 1.5 equiv of dimeth-
ylphenylsilyllithium to a -78 °C solution of morpholine
amide 1a in THF for 90 min followed by the addition of
aqueous ammonium chloride affords the desired acylsilane
3a in 72% yield.22 To probe the scope of this reaction, the
The addition of anionic silyl nucleophiles to acid chlorides
is typically the most direct method for the synthesis of
acylsilanes, but this method requires at least 2 equiv of the
silyllithium reagent and suffers largely from stoichiometric
copper(I) cyanide required for the reaction to proceed in high
yield.16 Unfortunately, on a preparative scale, this process
(7) (a) Colvin, E. W. Silicon Reagents in Organic Synthesis; Academic
Press: London, 1988. (b) Page, P. C. B.; Klair, S. S.; Rosenthal, S. Chem.
Soc. ReV. 1990, 19, 147-195.
(8) Degl’Innocenti, A.; Walton, D. R. M.; Seconi, G.; Pirazzini, G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 3927-3928.
(9) (a) Miller, J. A.; Zweifel, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6217-
6219. (b) Miller, J. A.; Zweifel, G. Synthesis 1981, 288-289.
(10) (a) Brook, A. G.; Duff, J. M.; Jones, P. F.; Davis, N. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 431-434. (b) Corey, E. J.; Seebach, D.; Freedman,
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 434-436.
(11) (a) Katritzky, A. R.; Yang, Z. J.; Hong, Q. M. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 5097-5099. (b) Katritzky, A. R.; Wang, Z. Q.; Lang, H. Y. Organo-
metallics 1996, 15, 486-490. (c) Katritzky, A. R.; Lang, H. Y.; Wang, Z.
Q.; Lie, Z. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7551-7557.
(12) Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 259-281.
(13) Nowick, J. S.; Danheiser, R. L. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 2798-
2802.
(14) Danheiser, R. L.; Fink, D. M.; Okano, K.; Tsai, Y. M.; Szczepanski,
S. W. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 5393-5396.
(15) (a) Picard, J. P.; Calas, R.; Dunogues, J.; Duffaut, N.; Gerval, J.;
Lapouyade, P. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 420-424. (b) Rich, J. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5886-5893.
(16) (a) Capperucci, A.; Degl’Innocenti, A.; Faggi, C.; Ricci, A.;
Dembech, P.; Seconi, G. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3612-3614. (b) Bonini,
B. F.; Comes-Franchini, M.; Mazzanti, G.; Passamonti, U.; Ricci, A.; Zani,
P. Synthesis 1995, 92-96.
(17) Fleming, I.; Ghosh, U. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 257-
262.
(18) Chuang, T.-H.; Fang, J.-M.; Jiaang, W.-T.; Tsai, Y.-M. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 1794-1805.
(19) Jiaang, W.-T.; Lin, H.-C.; Tang, K.-H.; Chang, L.-B.; Tsai, Y.-M.
J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 618-628.
(20) (a) Mart´ın, R.; Romea, P.; Tey, C.; Urp´ı, F.; Vilarrasa, J. Synlett
1997, 1414-1416. (b) Douat, C.; Heitz, A.; Martinez, J.; Fehrentz, J.-A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 37-40.
(21) (a) Nahm, S.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3815-
3818. (b) Sigma-Aldrich pricing: N,O-dimethylhydroxylamine‚HCl costs
$195/mol, while morpholine is only $13/mol (calculation based on 100 g
bottles).
3978
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 22, 2004