Inorganic Chemistry
Communication
As this reactivity mode closes the postulated catalytic cycle, we
explored the possibility of catalytic C−S coupling using 1 as the
catalyst and NaO-t-Bu as the base. With only 1% of 1, the
reaction between 2,6-dimethylthiophenol and p-IC6H4F was
complete within 30 min at room temperature. Although several
systems are known to catalyze the C−S coupling of aromatic
thiols,9,10 the PNF-Pd pincer 1 is unusual because it shows high
selectivity with sterically hindered substrates.
Overall, the results of E−H bond functionalization studies
demonstrate that there are two competing pathways by which
these bonds can be activated in the PNF-pincer system. These
pathways are tentatively presented for the activation of aniline in
Scheme 6. Simultaneous coordination of the nucleophilic
thiol reagent, with bulky aromatic thiols strongly favoring the C−
S coupling pathway. Further studies of bond functionalization via
metal−ligand cooperation in 1 and similar systems are currently
underway.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
Complete experimental details for all new compounds and X-ray
crystallographic data (CIF) for 2, 4a, 5, and 6. This material is
■
S
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Scheme 6. Proposed Mechanistic Pathways for the Activation
of N−H Bonds in Aniline
Author Contributions
All authors have given approval to the final version of the
manuscript.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This work was supported by U.S.−Israel Binational Science
Foundation Grant 2010119. We thank Dr. Leonid Konstanti-
novsky for help with NMR analysis.
REFERENCES
■
(1) (a) Muller, T. E.; Hultzsch, K.; Yus, C. M.; Foubelo, F.; Tada, M.
̈
Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3795−3892. (b) Hintermann, L. Top. Organomet.
Chem. 2010, 31, 123−155. (c) Piers, W. E. Organometallics 2011, 30,
13−16.
(2) For example, see: (a) Ozerov, O. V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 83−
88. (b) Kanzelberger, M.; Zhang, X.; Emge, T. J.; Goldman, A. S.; Zhao,
J.; Incarvito, C.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13644−
13645.
(3) (a) Gunanathan, C.; Milstein, D. Top. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 37,
55−84. (b) Gunanathan, C.; Ben-David, Y.; Milstein, D. Science 2007,
317, 790−792. (c) Balaraman, E.; Gunanathan, C.; Zhang, J.; Shimon, L.
J. W.; Milstein, D. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 609−614. For recent reviews, see:
(d) Gunanathan, C.; Milstein, D. Science 2013, 341, DOI: 10.1126/
science.1229712. (e) van der Vlugt, J. I. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 363−
375. (f) Gelman, D.; Musa, S. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 2456−2466.
heteroatom and fluorine “arm” can facilitate the fluorine
substitution, which is followed by a rapid intramolecular
hydrogen transfer to the ligand recovering the aromatic quinoline
core (path A). Alternatively, concerted metal-assisted intermo-
lecular hydrogen transfer to the CH−P group can take place
initially, thus activating the nucleophile toward the C−F
activation reaction (path B). Experimental evidence for the
concerted activation of N−H and O−H bonds by the metal and
CH−P group has been provided in related ruthenium systems
and corroborated by density functional theory studies.7a,11 In any
case, metal coordination seems to be essential in the activation of
E−H bonds by 1 because fairly acidic noncoordinating C−H
acids, such as nitromethane or acetylacetone, did not react under
these conditions. With the softer more acidic thiols, reaction
initially takes place at the metal center, leading to S−aryl
elimination. When sterically encumbered thiols are used, no
fluorine replacement at the 8 position takes place, allowing for
catalytic cross-coupling reactions to occur.6 Although, in the case
of aromatic thiols, such cross-coupling does not necessarily
involve the aromatization−dearomatization mechanism, our
studies suggest that with less acidic E−H bonds it should be
possible to direct cross-coupling chemistry to proceed via such a
pathway when the organic molecule is a poor nucleophile.
In conclusion, we reported the first examples of irreversible
double activation of water and unactivated aromatic amines that
involve the metal−ligand cooperation mechanism, with reactions
taking place under very mild conditions. In addition, the
activation of S−H bonds is dependent on the nature of the
(4) Muniz, K.; Lishchynskyi, A.; Streuff, J.; Nieger, M.; Escudero-Adan
́
,
̃
E. C.; Martínez Belmonte, M. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4911−4913.
(5) Huang, Z.; Zhou, J.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
11458−11460.
(6) Scharf, A.; Goldberg, I.; Vigalok, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135,
967−970.
(7) For some recent example of single N−H activation via metal−
ligand cooperation mode, see: (a) Khaskin, E.; Iron, M. A.; Shimon, L. J.
W.; Zhang, J.; Milstein, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8542−8543.
(b) de Boer, S. Y.; Gloaguen, Y.; Reek, J. N. H.; Lutz, M.; van der Vlugt, J.
I. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 11276−11520. (c) Chang, Y.-H.; Nakajima,
Y.; Tanaka, H.; Yoshizawa, K.; Ozawa, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135,
11791−11794. (d) Gutsulyak, D. V.; Piers, W. E.; Borau-Garcia, J.;
Parvez, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 11776−11779.
(8) Feller, M.; Diskin-Posner, Y.; Shimon, L. J. W.; Ben-Ari, E.;
Milstein, D. Organometallics 2012, 31, 4083−4101.
(9) (a) Eichman, C. C.; Stambuli, J. P. Molecules 2011, 16, 590−608.
(b) Bichler, P.; Love, J. A. Top. Organomet. Chem. 2010, 31, 39−64.
(10) The fluorine atom at this position was susceptible to substitution
by the strongly nucleophilic alkoxides: Scharf, A.; Goldberg, I.; Vigalok,
A. Organometallics 2012, 31, 1275−1277.
(11) Yang, X.; Hall, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 120−130.
C
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic402315a | Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX