T. Ito, T. Nehira / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 314–318
317
We know that compounds 1a–3a are the simplest forms of skel-
References and notes
etal variations of ResOligos in the family Dipterocarpaceae. This
study provided two important findings. First, because the absolute
configuration of 1a and 2a was previously established, the results
obtained by dehydroxylation can be confirmed to agree with the
preceding structural determinations. Second, the absolute configu-
ration of 3c has been unambiguously determined using the dehy-
droxylation-computation (‘hybrid’) method based on a chemical
correlation, allowing the determination of the absolute configura-
tion of 3a.
The dehydroxylation (or deoxygenation) of phenols was origi-
nally applied in structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies, be-
cause the desired products of dehydroxylation enable the
identification of the contribution of hydroxy groups to biological
activity.12a Recently, we also applied this method to the SAR study
of resveratrol to identify the role of hydroxy groups in expressing
anti-androgenic activity.12b In this study, for the first time, dehydr-
oxylation was used for the determination of absolute configura-
tion. It should be emphasized that dehydroxylation can
dramatically reduce the number of dominant conformations and
enable ECD calculations. The principal consideration in this proce-
dure is the complete removal of phenolic hydroxy groups from
mother compounds, because any remaining flexible hydroxy
groups will dramatically increase the number of stable
conformers.
8. All conformational searches were performed with CONFLEX 6 (Ver. 6.89 by
CONFLEX, Tokyo) using
a commercially available PC (operating system:
Windows7 Professional SP1 64-bit, CPU: QuadCore Xeon E3-1225 processor
3.10 GHz, RAM 8 GB). The initial structure was constructed on a graphical user
interface considering the absolute configuration of interest and was subjected
to conformational search adopting MMFF94S (2010–12-04HG) as the force
field, where initial stable conformers were generated for up to 50 kcal/mol.
13. (a) Representative procedure for the preparation of triflates of oligomeric
resveratrol derivatives: Excessive trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride (0.1 mL,
The assignment of the absolute configuration of new
compounds is conducted by either X-ray crystallography, which
requires single crystals, NMR-modified Mosher’s method for sec-
ondary alcohols, or ECD exciton chirality analysis for which the
complete relative configuration must be known. However, these
methodologies are difficult to apply to ResOligos because these
compounds are typically amorphous solids that lack a secondary
alcohol2 and often some relative configurations are unknown.
Other approaches have been undertaken for the elucidation of oli-
gostilbenoids, including the comparative analysis of the absolute
1.2 mmol) was added to a solution of 3a (27.2 mg, 40 lmol) in pyridine
(1.0 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was kept at room temperature for 12 h.
The mixture was diluted with ice water (20 mL) and extracted with EtOAc
(20 mL ꢁ 3). The organic phase was washed with saturated NaHCO3, saturated
CuSO4, water, and brine, and dried over NaSO4. Filtration and evaporation in
vacuo yielded a dark brown solid (49 mg). Preparative TLC on silica gel (n-
configuration of the b-D
-glucopyranosyl group,21 and semisyn-
thetic preparation using authentic mother compounds.22 The pres-
ently suggested approach is a simple and practical combination of
established reactions and nondestructive simulations, and thus is
an eligible option for ResOligos and presumably numerous other
polyphenols.
hexane-EtOAc 6:1) yielded 3b as a clear solid (38.8 mg, 22.4
Procedure for Pd/C-Mg-mediated dehydroxylation: After two vacuum/Ar
cycles to remove air from the reaction tube, mixture of 3b (30.0 mg,
17.3 mol), 10% Pd/C (6.0 mg, 10 wt % of 3b), NH4OAc (10.8 mg, 140 mol
(1 equiv for OTf groups)), and Mg metal (6.7 mg, 275 mol (2 equiv for OTf
lmol, 56%); (b)
a
l
l
Due to the lack of chiroptical properties of ResOligos in the
database, an empirical ECD approach (determination of the struc-
ture and connection patterns by addition and/or subtraction of
experimental ECD spectra) is not completely feasible at present.
Although there are a few reports of the structural elucidation of
naturally occurring ResOligos based on computational
approaches,23 as far as we know, neither conformational analyses
nor the contribution of hydroxy groups to conformational flexi-
bility have been evaluated. We have clarified that the flexible
phenolic hydroxy groups of ResOligos not only control the bioac-
tivity but also enhance their conformational stabilization in prot-
ic solvents.
In summary, the current Letter reports the first application of
the dehydroxylation of ResOligos, the building blocks of stilbe-
noids, to the configurational assignment of these important struc-
tures. As demonstrated with 1a–3a, the method is a simple and
practical combination of chemical conversion and computational
simulation. Thorough study of the applications of this method to
compounds in the ResOligo database is underway.
l
groups)) in methanol (1.0 mL) was stirred at ordinary pressure (balloon) and
temperature (ca. 20 °C) for 24 h. The reaction mixture was filtered using a
membrane filter (Millipore, Millex-LH, 0.45 l), and the filtrate was partitioned
between EtOAc (10 mL) and water (10 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted
with EtOAc (10 mL ꢁ 3), and the combined organic layers were washed with
brine (10 mL), dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated under
reduced pressure to yield a brown solid (12 mg). Preparative TLC (n-hexane-
EtOAc 6:1) yielded 3c as a clear solid (6.9 mg, 12.5 lmol, 72%).
15. All triflated and dehydroxylated products were characterized by their 1H NMR
and MS spectral data. 1b: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, TMS int.): d 7.31 (1H, d,
J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.27 (2H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, ArH), 7.23 (2H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, ArH), 7.17
(2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, ArH), 7.12 (1H, br s, ArH), 7.09 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, ArH), 6.86
(1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 6.64 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, ArH), 5.93 (1H, d, J = 11.2 Hz, CH),
5.15 (1H, br s, CH), 4.10 (1H, d, J = 11.2 Hz, CH), 3.83 (1H, dd, J = 18.0, 4.0 Hz,
CH), 3.55 (1H, br d, J = 18.0 Hz, CH) ppm. ESIMS: m/z 1112.8803 [MꢀH]ꢀ (calcd
for C33H16O16F15S5, 1112.8808); 1c: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, TMS int.): d 7.44
(1H, br d, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.30–7.09 (14H, m, ArH), 6.85 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH),
6.63 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 5.96 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz, CH), 4.53 (1H, br s, CH),
4.34 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz, CH), 3.82 (1H, dd, J = 18.0, 4.0 Hz, CH), 3.51 (1H, br d,
J = 18.0 Hz, CH) ppm. ESIMS: m/z 375.1692 [M+H]+ (calcd for C28H23O,
375.1743). CD nm (c = 26.7 lM, i-PrOH) (De): 205 (+28.5), 209 (+22.6), 225
(ꢀ76.8); 2c: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, TMS int.): d 9.78 (1H, s, CHO), 7.45 (1H,
t, J = 7.7 Hz, ArH), 7.42 (1H, dd, J = 7.7, 1.7 Hz, ArH), 7.38–7.25 (9H, m, ArH),
7.17 (2H, m, ArH), 5.68 (1H, d, J = 5.2 Hz, CH), 4.98 (1H, d, J = 5.2 Hz, CH) ppm.
Supplementary data
EIMS: m/z 300.1155 [M]+ (calcd for C21H16O2, 300.1150). CD nm (c = 33.3
lM, i-
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
PrOH) (
D
e
): 228 (ꢀ34.1), 265 (+8.2); 3b: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, TMS int.): d
7.40 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, ArH), 7.32 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, ArH), 7.27 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz,
ArH), 7.26–7.19 (8H, m, ArH), 7.17 (1H, t, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.02 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz,