L.-J. Gu et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 25 (2014) 90–92
91
O
Previous work
R
filtered. Solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure. The
residue was purified by flash column chromatography with
hexane/ethyl acetate to give the corresponding product 3.
(5,6-Dimethyl-1H-indol-3-yl)(phenyl)methanone (3af): Gray
R'
Lewis acid
a
+
R'COCl
ArNH
R
N
H
N
H
solid; Mp 192–194 8C; IR (KBr, cmÀ1):
1104; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
7.82–7.79 (m, 2H), 7.49–7.43 (m, 3H), 7.23 (s, 1H), 2.33 (s, 3H), 2.31
(s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6):
189.5, 137.8, 137.3, 136.2,
v
d
max 3109, 2921, 1724, 1521,
8.23 (s, 1H), 7.92 (s, 1H),
O
R'
Ru or Fe
TBHP
R'
R
+
R
R
b
d
N
N
H
H
133.0, 132.3, 129.4, 128.6, 127.5, 120.8, 117.4, 113.4, 110.7, 20.5
20.3; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C17H16NO (M+H)+ (m/z): 250.1227,
found: 250.1231.
O
R'
Pd
R
c
N
CR'
O
+
3. Results and discussion
N
H
N
H
Our initial study started from the coupling of indole 2a with
phenylglyoxylic acid 1a using O2 as the oxidant, Pd(TFA)2 as the
catalyst in the presence of I2, K2CO3 and N,N-dimethylformamide
(DMF) at 45 8C for 12 h. To our delight, the desired product 3aa was
obtained in 43% yield (entry 1, Table 1). It was found that Pd(OAc)2
was superior to other Pd sources (entries 1–4, Table 1). Further
studies indicated that the presence of iodine could promote the
efficiency of this transformation (entry 5, Table 1). It was found
that Cs2CO3 was superior to other bases (entries 4 and 6–8,
Table 1). The influence of solvent on the reaction efficiency was
also significant; when N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) was chosen as
the solvent, the yield was enhanced to 82% (entries 8–13, Table 1).
This work
R
O
R'
Pd(OAc) 2,O 2
Cs2CO3, I2
OH
+
d
R'
R
N
H
N
O
H
Scheme 1. Existing routes and our strategy to 3-acylindoles.
2. Experimental
Reagents were obtained commercially and used as received.
Solvents were purified and dried by standard methods. The
melting points were determined on an XT-4 micro melting point
apparatus and uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded on an
EQUINOX-55 spectrometer on a KBr matrix. NMR spectra were
recorded on an INOVA-400 NMR instrument at room temperature
using TMS as internal standard. Coupling constants (J) were
With the optimized conditions in hand,
oxocarboxylic acids 1 were investigated, as shown in Table 2.
Both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing -oxocar-
a series of a-
a
boxylic acids could be successfully converted to the corresponding
3-acylindoles in good yields. In addition, a high level of tolerance
by functional groups was observed, and the efficiency of the
reaction was not affected in the presence of halide, ether, and nitro
group. Furthermore, substituents at different positions on the
arene group (para, meta, and ortho positions) did not affect the
measured in Hz. Chemical shift values (d) are given in ppm. High
Resolution mass spectrometer (HRMS) spectra were recorded on a
Bruker micrOTOF-Q II analyzer. A 200–300 mesh silica gel was
used for column chromatography.
Representative procedure for the synthesis of 3-acylindoles (3):
A 10 mL oven-dried Schlenk tube was charged with phenyl-
glyoxylic acid 1a (49.5 mg, 0.33 mmol), indole 2a (35.1 mg,
0.3 mmol), I2 (164.5 mg, 0.65 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol%, 6.7 mg,
0.03 mmol), Cs2CO3 (292 mg, 0.9 mmol). The tube was evacuated
and filled with O2 (this procedure was repeated three times). Then
NMP (1.5 mL) were added with a syringe under a counter flow of
O2. The tube was sealed with a screw cap. The reaction was stirred
at 45 8C for 12 h, and was then allowed to cool to ambient
temperature. The mixture was added 20 mL EtOAc, and filtered,
washed with water. The organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and
reaction efficiency. It is noteworthy that halo-substituted a-
oxocarboxylic acids were tolerated well, thus leading to halo-
substituted products, which could be used for further transforma-
tions (entries 2 and 3, Table 2). Subsequently 2-thienylglyoxylic
acid was used in this reaction, affording the corresponding
products in good yields (entry 7, Table 2). Gratifyingly, aliphatic
a-oxocarboxylic acids were also compatible in this reaction, giving
the desired product in 71% yield (entries 8 and 9, Table 2).
To expand the scope of this direct acylation reaction further, we
next investigated the decarboxylative coupling of phenylglyoxylic
Table 2
Palladium-catalyzed decarboxylative acylation of a
-oxocarboxylic acids 1 with 2a.a
Table 1
Palladium-catalyzed decarboxylative acylation of free (N–H) indoles.a
Entry
Pd(II)
Base
Solvent
Yield (%)b
1
2
Pd(TFA)2
PdCl2
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
Na2CO3
K3PO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMAc
THF
43
26
36
57
16
44
62
77
58
NDd
23
82
ND
3
Pd(dba)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
4
5c
6
Entry
1
R1
3
Yield (%)b
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
Ph
3aa
3ba
3ca
3da
3ea
3fa
82
76
73
80
79
77
81
71
74
8
4-ClC6H4
3-BrC6H4
4-NO2C6H4
2-MeC6H4
4-OMeC6H4
2-Thienyl
t-Bu
9
10
11
12
13
DCM
NMP
Diglyme
1g
1h
1i
3ga
3ha
3ia
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.33 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol), PdX2, (10% mol), I2
(0.65 mmol), Base (0.9 mmol), solvent (3 mL), O2 (1 atm), 45 8C, 12 h.
Me
b
a
Yield of isolated product.
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.33 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol), Pd(OAc)2, (0.03 mmol), I2
(0.65 mmol), Cs2CO3 (0.9 mmol), NMP (3 mL), O2 (1 atm), 45 8C, 12 h.
c
Without I2.
d
b
ND, not determined.
Yield of isolated product.