N. Raman, R. Mahalakshmi / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 40 (2014) 157–163
163
1,10 phenathroline, υ(M_N): 421. 1H NMR (δ, ppm): 6.9–7.4 (m, aromatic),
Molar conductance ×10−3, (S cm2 mol−1): 19.80; μeff (BM):Diamagnetic. λmax in
(DMSO), cm−1: 26,178, 13,576 cm−1
.
[18] Anal. Calc. for (L2)C50H34N6Cl2Cu: C, 70.4; H, 4.0; N, 9.9; Cl, 8.3;Cu, 7.4%. Found: C, 70.1;
H, 3.7; N, 9.6; Cl, 7.9;Cu, 7.1%. FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: υ(C_N): 1622, υ(C_N): 727–846
for 1,10 phenathroline, υ(M_N): 423. Molar conductance ×10−3, (S cm2 mol−1):
14.70; μeff (BM):1.83. λmax in (DMSO), cm−1: 37,453, 35,568 cm−1
.
[19] Anal. Calc. for (L2)C50H34N6Cl2Ni: C, 70.7; H, 4.0; N, 9.9; Cl, 8.4;Ni, 6.9%. Found:
C, 70.3; H, 3.6; N, 9.5; Cl, 8.0; Ni, 6.5%. FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: υ(C_N): 1634, υ(C_N):
724–846 for 1,10 phenathroline, υ(M_N): 421. Molar conductance ×10−3
,
(S cm2 mol−1): 16.20; μeff (BM):3.12. λmax in (DMSO), cm−1: 37,175, 11,967,
13,568 cm−1
.
[20] Anal. Calc. for (L2)C50H34N6Cl2Zn: C, 70.2; H, 4.0; N, 9.8; Cl, 8.3;Zn, 7.6%. Found:
C, 69.8; H, 3.7; N, 9.4; Cl, 7.9; Zn, 7.2%. FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: υ(C_N): 1623,
υ(C_N): 724–846 for 1,10 phenathroline, υ(M_N): 426. 1H NMR (δ, ppm):
6.9–7.4 (m, aromatic), Molar conductance ×10−3, (S cm2 mol−1): 20.95; μeff
[10] The Schiff base was prepared by the dropwise addition of an ethanolic solution
(50 mL) of diphenylglyoxal into a solution of 1-amino-4-nitrobenzene (L1)/1-
amino-4-chlorobenzene (L2)/p-anisidine (L3) (1:1 molar ratio of 10 mM) in etha-
nol. After completion of the addition, the solution was refluxed on a water bath
for 3 h and allowed to cool by standing at room temperature. The formed solid
product was removed by filtration and recrystallized from ethanol (yield: 75% for
L1; 70% for L2; 78% for L3).
(BM): Diamagnetic. λmax in (DMSO), cm−1: 37,453, 25,568 cm−1
.
[21] Anal. Calc. for (L3)C52H40N6O2Cu: C, 73.9; H, 4.8; N, 9.9; Cu, 7.5%. Found: C, 73.5;
H, 4.2; N, 9.6; Cu, 7.1%. FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: υ(C_N): 1664, υ(C_N): 724–846 for
1,10 phenathroline, υ(M_N): 424. Molar conductance ×10−3, (S cm2 mol−1):
13.75; μeff (BM):1.84. λmax in (DMSO), cm−1: 37,453, 33,654 cm−1
.
[22] Anal. Calc. for (L3)C52H40N6O2Ni: C, 74.7; H, 4.7; N, 9.8; Ni, 6.8%. Found: C, 74.3;
H, 4.3; N, 9.2; Ni, 6.5%. FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: υ(C_N): 1666, 727–852 for 1,10
phenathroline, υ(M_N): 422. Molar conductance ×10−3, (S cm2 mol−1): 15.20;
[11] Anal. Calc. for (L1)C26H18N4O4: C, 69.3; H, 4.0; N, 12.4%. Found: C, 68.9; H, 3.8;
N, 12.0%. FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: υ(C_N): 1593 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz, δ,
μeff (BM):3.20. λmax in (DMSO), cm−1: 37,174, 15,631, 13,568 cm−1
.
ppm): 6.8–7.7 (m, aromatic), λmax in (DMSO), cm−1: 37,251, 30,250 cm−1
.
[23] Anal. Calc. for (L3)C52H40N6O2Zn: C, 74.1; H, 4.6; N, 9.7; Zn, 7.6%. Found: C, 73.7;
H, 4.2; N, 9.3; Zn, 7.2%. FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: υ(C_N): 1664, υ(C_N): 724–846 for
1,10 phenathroline, υ(M_N): 421. 1H NMR (δ, ppm): 6.9–7.4 (m, aromatic),
Molar conductance ×10−3, (S cm2 mol−1): 22.14; μeff (BM): Diamagnetic. λmax
[12] Anal. Calc. for(L2)C26H18N2Cl2: C, 72.7; H, 4.2; N, 6.5;Cl,16.5%. Found: C, 70.1; H, 3.9;
N, 6.1;Cl,15.9%. FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: υ(C = N): 1664, 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,
δ, ppm): 6.9–7.4 (m, aromatic), λmax in (DMSO), cm−1: 37,364, 31,260 cm−1
.
[13] Anal. Calc. for(L3)C28H24N2O2: C, 79.9; H, 5.7; N, 6.7; Found: C, 79.3; H, 5.4; N, 6.2%.
in (DMSO), cm−1: 37,174, 24,568 cm−1
.
FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: υ(C = N): 1668, 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz, δ, ppm): 6.9–7.4
(m, aromatic), λmax in (DMSO), cm−1: 37,254, 31,250 cm−1
.
[14] A solution of Schiff base and 1,10-phenanthroline in ethanol was added to a solution
of MCl2·2H2O (1:2:1 molar ratio of 10 mM) in ethanol and the mixture was stirred
for 1 h and the solution was refluxed on a water bath for 6 h. The solid product
so-formed was separated by filtration and washed thoroughly with ethanol
and dried in vacuo (yield: 62% for [CuL1(phen)2]; 59% for [NiL1(phen)2];
52% for [ZnL1(phen)2]; 58% for [CuL2(phen)2]; 56% for [NiL2(phen)2];
52% for [ZnL2(phen)2]; 60% for[CuL3(phen)2]; 57% for [NiL2(phen)2]; 53% for
[ZnL3(phen)2]).
[15] Anal. Calc. for (L1)C50H34N8O4Cu: C, 68.7; H, 3.9; N, 12.8; Cu, 7.3%. Found: C, 68.3;
H, 3.6; N, 12.6; Cu, 7.0%. FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: υ(C_N): 1654, υ(C_N): 721–850
for 1,10 phenathroline, υ(M_N): 422. Molar conductance ×10−3, (S cm2 mol−1):
15.75; μeff (BM):1.80. λmax in (DMSO), cm-1: 25,976, 13,568 cm−1
.
[16] Anal. Calc. for (L1)C50H34N8O4Ni: C, 69.1; H, 3.9; N, 12.9; Ni, 6.7%. Found: C, 68.7;
H, 3.5; N, 12.5; Ni, 6.3%. FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: υ(C_N): 1629, υ(C_N): 727–846 for
1,10 phenathroline, υ(M_N): 423. Molar conductance ×10−3, (S cm2 mol−1):
17.40; μeff (BM):3.10. λmax in (DMSO), cm−1: 26, 109, 15,593, 13,568 cm−1
.
[17] Anal. Calc. for (L1)C50H34N8O4Zn: C, 65.6; H, 3.9; N, 12.7; Zn, 7.4%. Found: C, 65.1;
H, 3.7; N, 12.3; Zn, 7.1%. FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: υ(C_N): 1627, υ(C_N): 727–846 for