ACS Catalysis
Letter
activation of arenes is yet to be exploited probably because of
the perceived lower reactivity. To address this, we sought to
investigate aromatic carbonyl compounds in palladium-
catalyzed remote meta-C−H activation, envisaging that the
carbonyl group serving as a hydrogen-bond acceptor would be
able to pair with a hydrogen-bond donor bearing a suitable
directing template. N,N′-Substituted ureas behave as the
strong double hydrogen-bond donors, shown thus far to be
capable of assembling a lot of guest acceptor molecules
including aldehydes, ketones, esters, imines, N-acyliminium
ions, and nitro compounds.11 Herein, we report that the N,N′-
substituted urea scaffold is highly proficient as a hydrogen-
bond donor to direct palladium-catalyzed C−H functionaliza-
tion to the meta position in a series of arene substrates bearing
the carbonyl group as hydrogen-bond acceptors.
Scheme 2. Evaluation of Hydrogen-Bonding Donors for Pd-
Catalyzed meta-C−H Olefination
a
Based on the Yu’s pioneering work3a on remote meta-
selective C−H functionalization directed by a covalently U-
shaped template, a range of DGs for transition-metal-catalyzed
distal C−H functionalization have been developed since then.
Over the past few years, We,12 Yu,13 Maiti,14 and others15 have
identified a substituted salicylonitrile moiety as the versatile
template to direct palladium-catalyzed meta-C−H functional-
ization in various arene derivatives. In approaching the
development of an efficient hydrogen-bonding donor template,
we began by elaborating an appropriate N,N′-substituted urea
framework for Pd-catalyzed remote C−H functionalization of
arenes, according to the experimental and computational
results established for the covalently binding template-
s.12a,13b,16 By integrating a salicylonitrile-bearing tether into
the urea backbone, a powerful double hydrogen-bonding
interaction appears plausible with an aromatic carbonyl
substrate promoting C−H activation at the meta position of
the phenyl ring. Therefore, we first synthesized a series of N-
cyclohexyl ureas, L1−L5, containing an additional directing
functional group on the other nitrogen atom (Scheme 2).
Using acetophenone as a model substrate, C−H olefination
only gave the poor reactivity with a mixture of o-, m-, and p-
products (o/m/p = 1/0.8/0.2) in the absence of a hydrogen-
bonding donor. The major o-olefinated product obtained is
probably attributed to the natively Pd-catalyzed carbonyl-
directed ortho-C−H activation.17 While an equivalent H-
bonding donor (L2−L4) bearing a meta-selective DG was
added into the reaction, the desired products were afforded
with significantly improved regioselectivity, albeit in just a
slightly higher yield. By modifying the salicylonitrile moiety in
hydrogen-bonding donors (L5), C−H olefination achieved the
m-product in up to 48% yield with a regioselectivity of o/m/p =
1.0/3.1/1.2. Pleasingly, replacing the cyclohexyl group in the
urea with a 3,5-(bis)trifluoromethyl phenyl group led to a
dramatic improvement in both reactivity and regioselectivity
(L6−L10). Hydrogen-bonding donor L9 was the most effective,
affording the olefinated products at 69% yield with a
regioselectivity of o/m/p = 1.0/4.0/1.0. A possible explanation
for the enhanced reactivity of hydrogen-bonding donors (L6−
L10) is that a very weak, not detectable by routine
spectroscopic and crystallographic methods, intramolecular
C−H--O interaction between the weakly acidic ortho-C−H
proton and the urea carbonyl group takes place,11a−c which
drastically increases the binding potential of hydrogen-bonding
donors to guest molecules. The dimethoxy substituent on the
nitrile template (L9) affords improved reactivity and
regioselectivity, probably because of the enhanced electron
density of the phenyl ring which prompts the metal binding of
a
NMR yield, and regioselectivity was determined by 1H NMR
b
analysis with reference to an internal standard. C−H olefination
occurring in the template was also observed. n.d.: regioselectivity not
detected, n.r.: no reaction.
the cyano group.18 The use of symmetrical N,N′-dicyclohexyl,
N,N′-diaryl ureas (L11 and L13), or unsymmetrical urea (L12)
only provided comparable yields to the blank experiment but
with slightly higher meta regioselectivities. C−H olefination in
the presence of thiourea (L14) failed to give the desired
products, which is certainly due to the poisoning deactivation
of Pd catalysts by the coordination of sulfur atoms in the
thiourea molecules. As the control experiments, removal of the
nitrile group in the hydrogen-bonding donor (L15 vs L6) led to
a significant decline in both reactivity and regioselectivity,
indicating the essential directing effect of the nitrile group.
Replacement of two hydrogen atoms on the urea N−H bonds
by two methyl groups (L16) also afforded a diminished yield
and meta selectivity. As observed in the previous reports,19 as a
solvent hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) shows a significant
influence on the yield and regioselectivity of C−H olefination
It is well-established that N,N′-disubstituted ureas as
hydrogen-bond donors may associate with guest molecules,
such as triphenylphosphine oxide (TPPO), dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO), and benzophenone,11b to form 1:1 complexes
through double hydrogen bonds. The solution NMR and IR
analyses proved to be particularly useful for hydrogen-bonding
interaction. As compared with L9 (5.81 ppm, 7.62 ppm) in d-
chloroform solution, the chemical shifts of two urea N−H
protons move downfield to 6.62 ppm, 9.18 ppm in L9/TPPO
1:1 complex and 6.70 ppm, 9.45 ppm in d6-DMSO solution,
respectively (Figure 1), consistent with the previous
10461
ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 10460−10466