10.1002/chem.202001394
Chemistry - A European Journal
COMMUNICATION
was obtained (E/Z = 85:15). This result points out that the transfer
of a vinyl group is not preferred over the transfer of an aryl group,
and therefore indicates that the rearrangement is more likely to
go through a -bond breaking process rather than a -addition,
as for the latter a unfavorable dearomatization has to occur.
Example 6b (possessing three styryl moieties) further supports
this hypothesis, as 7 was obtained in 54% and 3a in 46% GC-
ratio. The non-statistical distribution of products 3a and 7 in both
experiments also indicates that the aryl moiety is - in such cases -
a better transferable ligand than the styryl group.
Scheme 7: Proposed mechanism for the electro-olefination of ATB 2a.
In conclusion, we have developed a new conceptual approach to
alkene derivatives through electro-olefination. A simple strategy
was assembled for the synthesis of alkenylborate salts (ATBs) via
ligand exchanges on potassium trifluoroborates. No purification of
these salts was required for the sequence to be pursued and
deliver the expected coupling compounds in moderate to good
yields under electrochemical oxidation. Such method represents
an original and stereoconvergent alternative to the formation of
functionalized olefins, opening new ways of thinking about C-C
bond disconnections.
Scheme 6: Electrocoupling of different mixed potassium tetraorganoborate
salts. [a]In situ generated following general procedure D[14] as follows for 6a: 0.5
mmol 1p and 1.0 mmol styrylmagnesium bromide. For 6b: 0.5 mmol potassium
trifluoro(4-fluorophenyl)borate and 1.5 mmol styrylmagnesium bromide.
[b]Product distribution ratios are determined by GC analysis on crude mixtures
without isolation. Homocoupled biaryls are omitted and not included in the GC-
ratios for more clarity.
In summary, the alkenyl moiety is more prone to oxidation than
the aryl groups (as concluded from quantum-chemical
calculations and selectivity experiments, see Figure 1 and
Scheme 6) and leads to an intermediate alkyl radical cationic
species [A] (Scheme 7). We then propose that further
intramolecular -addition of one of the aryl moieties undergoes a
rearrangement[17] towards intermediate [B] in which the C-C alkyl
radical bond can freely rotate and lead to the thermodynamically
favored trans product (E)-3a. Oxygen probably interacts with the
reaction intermediates under formation of structure [C], as 3ab
was observed in traces under air and isolated in 37% yield when
the reaction was carried out under oxygen atmosphere. It is
however important to note that product 3ab does not come from
the oxidation of product 3a under electrochemical conditions, as
confirmed by control experiments, indicating a radical pathway.[14]
Based on cyclovoltametry (Figure 1), galvanostatic experiments
(Scheme 2) and our findings in the previous work on biaryl electro-
coupling,[7] we assume that no second oxidation has to occur
during the formation of the desired product 3a.
Acknowledgements
Robert J. Mayer (LMU Munich) is kindly acknowledged for his help
with cyclovoltammetry, as well as Hendrik Eijsberg (UCLdV,
Poitiers) for helpful comments in the preparation of this
manuscript. We thank the Chemical Industry Fund (FCI), the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG grant DI 2227/2-1 + JA
2794/1-1, SFB749), and the Ludwig-Maximilians University,
Munich (LMUExcellent) for financial support.
Keywords: Olefination • Electrochemistry • Stereoconvergent •
Organoborates • Catalyst-free
[1]
[2]
D. G. Brown, J. Boström, Journal of medicinal chemistry 2016, 59, 4443.
a) N. Miyaura, A. Suzuki, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1979, 866; b)
N. Miyaura, K. Yamada, A. Suzuki, Tetrahedron Letters 1979, 20, 3437.
a) D. Milstein, J. K. Stille, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 3636; b) R. F.
Heck, J. P. Nolley, J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 2320; c) A. O. King, N.
Okukado, E.-i. Negishi, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1977, 683; d) K.
Sonogashira, Y. Tohda, N. Hagihara, Tetrahedron Letters 1975, 16,
4467; e) Y. Hatanaka, T. Hiyama, J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 918; f) K.
Tamao, K. Sumitani, M. Kumada, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 4374.
a) E. J. Horn, B. R. Rosen, P. S. Baran, ACS Central Science 2016, 2,
302; b) M. Yan, Y. Kawamata, P. S. Baran, Chemical reviews 2017, 117,
[3]
[4]
5
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.