2016
V. K. Yadav et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 2015–2018
O
R3
H
R3
R3
H
2α
SnCl4
R
O-
O-
α
'
R2
R2
R1
TBDPS
TBDPS
DCM, -78 o
C
R1
3
R1
β
TBDPS
1
2
H R3
O
R3
R3
O
H
O
H
R2
R2
R2
TMS
TBDPS
R1
TBDPS
TBDPS
H R3
R1
TMS
R1
allyl-TMS
TMS
4
5
6
R3
O
O
H
R2
R2
TBDPS
TBDPS
R1
7
R1
8
Scheme 1. Homo-Nazarov cyclization and the possible products from exo-capture of the oxyallyl cation by allyl-TMS.
by allyl-TMS to generate 4a. Since allyl-TMS was believed to react
with an oxyallyl cation in stepwise manner as well,11 chloride ion-
initiated desilylation in 2-trimethylsilyl-substituted cation (not
shown) in Hosomi–Sakurai manner14 could be a distinct possibility
to generate the simply allylated species 7/8, as shown in Scheme 1.
Further, since the desilylation involves SN2 attack of chloride ion
on silicon, the reaction condition is likely to play an important con-
trol factor in as much as the extent of formation of 7/8 is con-
cerned. The collective size of the substituents on silicon is yet
another control factor as bulky substituents shield the silicon from
nucleophilic attack and thereby, reduce or even completely pre-
vent the desilylation pathway. TBDPS fits this requirement extre-
mely well15 and hence, we have used allyl-TBDPS to exclude this
desilylation possibility.
1), the b-methyl-substituted substrate 1d required 8 h (Table 1, en-
try 4).
The capture of oxyallyl cation by allyl-TBDPS was observed to
be considerably slow in comparison to the capture by allyl-TMS.
For instance, while the reaction of 1b with allyl-TMS took only
40 min to complete (Table 1, entry 2), the corresponding reaction
with allyl-TBDPS required 5 h (Table 1, entry 5). The large bulk of
TBDPS in allyl-TBDPS is a likely factor to exert greater resistance
to its approach to the oxyallyl cation in comparison to the TMS
in allyl-TMS.
The regio- and stereochemistry of the products were deter-
mined from nOe measurements in some instances, and on account
of the observed differential site-selectivity (vide supra) in the reac-
tion of allylsilane with oxyallyl cation, in the other instances. For
example, the product formed from the addition of allylsilane at less
substituted end of the oxyallyl cation was more abundant than the
product formed from such an addition at the more substituted end.
The saturation of TMS in 4b resulted in 7% nOe enhancement of the
signal for the quaternary methyl group. Such a feature was absent
in 5b. Likewise, saturation of TMS in 4c resulted in nOe enhance-
ment in the aromatic region, a feature that was absent in 5c. These
nOe results suggest vicinal syn arrangement of CH2TMS with the
methyl in 4b and phenyl in 4c, as shown. The same groups are
too far from each other in 5b and 5c to allow the nOe. Thus, the al-
lyl-TMS added to the oxyallyl cation exclusively in the exo mode to
generate 4b and 4c.
The products 5b and 5c were also formed from the exo addition
of allyl-TMS to oxyallyl cation as the endo addition is untenable on
account of the severe steric interactions between CH2TMS and the
axial hydrogen on CH2TBDPS-bearing carbon in the oxyallyl cation
3 in the requisite TS. This argument finds strong support in the for-
mation of a single isomer of 4a. Had the endo addition of allyl-TMS
also taken place, we must have obtained an isomer of 4a as well. It
is significant to note that West and co-workers have observed both
endo and exo additions in the [3+2] capture of the oxyallyl cation
formed from the usual Nazarov cyclization by allyl-TMS.11 The ste-
ric interactions in the TS required for endo addition in the construc-
tion of the bicyclo[3.2.1]octane skeleton thus appear to be
significantly more stringent than in the construction of the bicy-
clo[2.2.1]heptane skeleton. The observed stereo-control at C3 of
the bicyclo[3.2.1]octane skeleton arises from the least hindered
six-membered cyclic transition state resembling 2a–d which is re-
quired for ring closure between the olefinic bond and the silirani-
um ion;13,16 the large TBDPSCH2 group assuming the exclusive
equatorial position, as shown in Scheme 1.
Notably, the product 4a was formed from separate reactions of
cis-1a and trans-1a. Quenching experiments revealed that cis-1a
was first isomerized to trans-1a before it reacted in the homo-Naz-
arov fashion. However, trans-1a reacted directly without any isom-
erization to cis-1a. Since both cis-1a and trans-1a furnished the
same product 4a, the cis/trans-mixtures of 1b (1:1.5), 1c (1:20),
and 1d (1:1.6) were used in other instances.
The capture of oxyallyl cations was formed from the a -
- and a0
substituted ketones 1b and 1c by allyl-TMS generated 2:1 regioiso-
meric mixtures of 4b and 5b (Table 1, entry 2) and 4c and 5c
(Table 1, entry 3), respectively. The nucleophilic reaction of allyl-
TMS at the less substituted end of oxyallyl cation was thus nearly
two times more prevalent than the reaction at the more
substituted end. This could be for reasons such as (a) the higher
electrophilicity of the less substituted end of oxyallyl cation in
comparison to the more substituted end on steric grounds and
(b) the larger equilibrium concentration of the more substituted
enolate amounting to the less substituted cation than the less
substituted enolate amounting to the more substituted cation on
account of relative thermodynamic stability. Here, it is to be noted
that West and co-workers.11 have previously observed exclusive
bond formation at the less substituted end of the oxyallyl species.
Importantly, a substrate bearing a
-/a0-substituent was found to
react faster than a substrate lacking the same. For instance, the sub-
strates 1b and 1c reacted with allyl-TMS completely within 40 min
(Table 1, entry 2) and 5 min (Table 1, entry 3), respectively, in com-
parison to the reaction of 1a which required 3 h for completion. The
following two conclusions could be drawn from these observations:
(i) an a0-substituent facilitates cyclopropane ring cleavage to form
the more substituted enolate and (ii) an electron-releasing
tuent provides an additional electronic push for the intramolecular
nucleophilic -capture of the siliranium ion. Accordingly, a b-substi-
tuent was expected to retard the rate due to reversal in the polarity
of the bond. Indeed, while the reaction of the unsubstituted sub-
strate 1a with allyl-TMS required 3 h for completion (Table 1, entry
a-substi-
p
The simply a-allylated product 7c was indeed formed in 10%
yield from the reaction of 1c at ꢀ78 °C. A similar reaction at
ꢀ30 °C also generated 7c in 20% yield and the combined yield of
the bicyclic products 4c and 5c was compromised to just 60% from
p