1652
Y. Liu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 24 (2014) 1650–1653
O
C
OH
OH
a or b
O
c
N
N
Cbz
O
COOH
a
m
37: m = 1
38: m = 2
36
O
R3
R1
R2
19
O
18
C
N
NH
6
d
O
O
N
N
O
OMe
m
OAc
OMe
27-31
OMe
d
39: m = 1
40: m = 2
b
m
OAc
c
O
O
O
OMe
22
OAc
21
12-17
12: m = 2, R1 = R2 = OMe, R3 = Me; 13: m = 2, R1 = OMe, R2 = R3 = Me;
23
20
O
O
O
14: m = 2, R1 = R2 = R3 = Me;
16: m = 2, R1, R2 = Ph , R3 = H;
15: m = 2, R1, R2 = Ph, R3 = Me;
17: m = 1, R1 = OMe, R2 = R3 = Me
R1
R3
R1
R2
R3
e or f
Br
R2
n
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) benzyl piperazine-1-carboxylate, EDCI,
HOBt, DCM, 82%; (b) benzyl 1,4-diazepane-1-carboxylate, EDCI, HOBt, DCM, 75%;
(c) 10% Pd/C, H2, MeOH, rt; (d) TBAI, CH3CN, reflux, 50–70%.
O
24: R1 = R2 = OMe, R3 = Me
23: R1 = OMe, R2 = R3 = Me
19: R1 = R2 = R3 = Me
27: n = 6, R1 = R2 = OMe, R3 = Me
28: n = 6, R1 = OMe, R2 = R3 = Me
29: n = 6, R1 = R2 = R3 = Me
Table 1
Antiproliferative activity of AA005 (1) and new mimetics 2–17a–c
25: R1, R2 = Ph, R3 = Me
26: R1, R2 = Ph, R3 = H
23: R1 = OMe, R2 = R3 = Me
30: n = 6, R1, R2 = Ph, R3 = Me
31: n = 6, R1, R2 = Ph, R3 = H
32: n = 1, R1 = OMe, R2 = R3 = Me
Compd
GI50
HCT116
(lM)
SGC7901
HLF
16HBE
1 (AA005)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.16
9.77
0.14
>20
>20
8.69
0.04
0.14
0.12
>20
9.76
5
1.56
1.39
5.57
>20
5.27
0.03
1.95
0.18
0.07
0.26
1.98
0.04
0.3
9.715
>20
>20
>20
>20
>20
>20
0.36
4.95
>20
>20
>20
>20
>20
>20
>20
>20
3.34
2.63
>20
3.85
3.52
1.14
>20
3.32
2.7
>20
>20
10.31
3.15
4
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) I2, H2O2, H2SO4, MeOH, 23 °C, 90%; (b)
Ac2O, BF3ꢀEt2O, 40 °C, 92%; (c) Me2SO4, aq NaOH, MeOH, 23 °C, 80%; (d) PIDA, 9:1
H2O/MeOH, 60%; (e) 11-bromoundecanoic acid, AgNO3, (NH4)2S2O8, 1:1 CH3CN/
H2O, 75 °C, 20–56%. (f) 7-Bromoheptanoic acid, AgNO3, (NH4)2S2O8, 1:1 CH3CN/H2O,
75 °C, 20%.
9
0.09
>20
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
O
1.48
1.36
0.89
1.78
0.97
>20
R3
R1
R2
O
H
N
n
n
R1
R2
R3
2.85
>20
3.19
N
N
O
O
a
Br
m
m
N
H
n
2.29
O
R2
R1
a
AA005 was used as a positive control.
Inhibition of cell growth by the listed compounds was determined by using
MTT assay.
33: m = 1
34: m = 2
b
27-32
R3
2-10
c
O
Standard error of the GI50 was generally less than 10%.
2: m = 1, n = 6, R1 = R2 = OMe, R3 = Me; 3: m = 1, n = 6, R1 = OMe, R2 = R3 = Me;
4: m = 1, n = 6, R1 R2 R3 = Me; 5: m = 1, n = 6, R1, R2 = Ph, R3 = Me;
6: m = 2, n = 6, R1 = R2 = OMe, R3 = Me; 7: m = 2, n = 6, R1 = OMe, R2 = R3 = Me;
=
=
methoxy group of ubiquinone ring was replaced by methyl group,
is 10 and 70 times more potent than 2 against SGC7901 and HCT-
116 cell lines, respectively. Compound 4, in which two methoxy
groups of ubiquinone ring were replaced by methyl group, is 28
times more potent than 2 against HCT-116 cell lines, but it lost
its antiproliferative activity against SGC7901 cell lines. Similarly,
compound 5 bearing benzo-quinone ring at the terminal lost its
antiproliferative activity against SGC7901 cell lines. These results
indicate that replacement of the methoxy groups of ubiquinone
ring by methyl groups may be an effective strategy for activity
improvement. Replacement of piperazine of compounds 2–5 with
homopiperazine resulted in compounds 6–9. They were found to
exhibit more potent inhibition of cell growth than the correspond-
ing compounds 2–5 against SGC7901 and HCT-116 cell lines,
respectively. For instance, compound 9 exhibits 2 and 167 times
8: m = 2, n = 6, R1
=
R2
=
R3 = Me;
9: m = 2, n = 6, R1, R2 = Ph, R3 = Me;
10: m = 2, n = 1, R1 = OMe, R2 = R3 = Me;
O
O
O
H
O
N
6
N
N
O
O
b
Br
6
N
H
O
6
35
28
O
11
O
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) TBAI, CH3CN, reflux, 50–70%; (b) TBAI,
CH3CN, reflux, 52%.
more potency than the corresponding compound
5 against
SGC7901 and HCT-116 cell lines, respectively. We are pleased to
find that compound 7 bearing a homopiperazine ring and 3-meth-
oxy-2,5-dimethyl quinone was identified as the best compound in
the terminal showed 61–65 times less potency than AA005 in
inhibition of the cell growth (SGC7901 and HCT-116), and no inhi-
bition was found against HLF cell lines. Compound 3, in which one