Factors such as catalyst, temperature, molar ratio of substrates, and reaction time have important effects on the
coupling reactions. We initially conducted a brief catalyst screening by running the reaction of daidzein and formaldehyde
solution (molar ratio1:1) at 80ꢀC for 20 h in the presence of different aliphatic amines, including ethylamine, diethylamine,
propylamine, isopropamide, dipropylamine, n-butylamine, and di(n-butyl)amine. The result showed that the coupling reaction
performed smoothly in the presence of 9 mol% triethylamine, affording the coupling product in high yield with easy purification.
Decreasing the catalyst loading led to lower yields even with prolonged reaction time, and increasing the catalyst loading to
12 mol % or 20 mol% increased the reaction rate but did not improve the yield significantly. This is tentatively attributed to the
rapid formation of a large amount of intermediate 3 (8-hydroxymethyldaidzein), which consumed the starting material and
1
led to insufficient daidzein to form the dimer. The intermediate 3 was separated and characterized (white powder, H NMR
(DMSO-d + D O, ꢂ, ppm): 8.00 (1H, s, H-2), 7.58 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-5), 7.33 (2H, d, J = 7.7 Hz, H-2ꢁ, 6ꢁ), 6.78 (2H, d,
6
2
–
J = 7.7 Hz, H-3ꢁ, 5ꢁ), 6.35 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-6), 4.69 (2H, s, CH OH). ESI-MS m/z 283 [M – H] . The reaction process was
2
seen to go through the formation of intermediate 3, which was in agreement with the report of Zhang et al. [13] and He et al.
[14].
Running the coupling reaction at different temperatures (0ꢀC, 20, 50, 80, 110, 140, 165ꢀC) proved the reaction was
sensitive to reaction temperature, and 80ꢀC was the optimal one. Temperatures lower than 80ꢀC resulted in slow reaction rates
and low yields, while higher temperatures (ꢄ 80ꢀC) generated complicated side reactions and decomposition of the product.
The effect of the molar ratio of daidzein and 37% formaldehyde solution on the reaction was also investigated, and 1.5:1
proved to be the optimum ratio (yield 82.1%). Initially, increasing the amount of formaldehyde solution improved the yield of
di(8-daidzeinyl)methane, while a molar ratio greater than daidzein–formaldehyde 1.5:1 resulted in low yields of
di(8-daidzeinyl)methane and the major formation of 8-hydroxymethyldaidzein.
EXPERIMENTAL
General Procedures. Daidzein was purchased from the Shanxi Huike Botanical Development Company. All other
materials were of analytical reagent grade purity. FT-IR spectra were recorded using an IR-200 Fourier transform spectrometer
1
13
in KBr pellets. H and C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz spectrometer operating at 400 MHz
using DMSO-d as solvent at room temperature (20 ꢅ 2ꢀC). The chemical shifts were expressed in ppm with reference to TMS,
6
and coupling constants (J) in Hz. Mass spectra were obtained on a Bruker Esquire 3000 instrument from ESI-MS measurements
at negative mode using methanol as solvent.
Di(8-daidzeinyl)methane (4). Daidzein (1) (0.5 g, 2.0 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (10 mL), and then triethylamine
(0.8 mL, 0.4 mmol) and 37% formaldehyde solution (2, 0.16 mL, 2.0 mmol) were added. The mixture was heated at 80ꢀC until
reaction completion after about 20 h. After cooling, the solvent was evaporated in vacuo, and a solid residue was obtained.
Recrystallization of the residue from methanol afforded the biflavonoid analog di(8-daidzeinyl)methane (4). White powder,
–1
1
13
FT-IR (KBr, , cm ): 3475 (OH), 1624 (C=O), 1420 (CH ). For H and C NMR spectral data, see Table 1. ESI-MS m/z 519
[M – H] .
2
–
In conclusion, we present here a simple protocol for the synthesis of a novel unnatural biflavonoid analog
di(8-daidzeinyl)methane using the triethylamine-catalyzed coupling reaction of daidzein and formaldehyde solution. Compound 4
was obtained with a yield of 82.1% when running the reaction of daidzein and formaldehyde (molar ratio 1.5:1) using 9 mol %
triethylamine at 80ꢀC for 20 h. Studies on the synthesis of other daidzein dimer derivatives will be reported in due course.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21172055), the Natural Science Foundation of the
Henan Educational Committee (No. 2011B150007, 12A150007), and the Plan for Scientific Innovation Talent (No. 11CXRC10)
and Doctoral Scientific Fund Project of the Henan University of Technology for financial support of this work.
78