3014
K. Fujita et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 3013–3016
derivatives have higher solubility in a polar protic solvent by low-
O X
ering the temperature.12 The fair chemical yield in entry 3 was
probably due to good solubility of 2G1[TEG] in methanol at room
temperature. We subsequently performed this carboxylative cycli-
zation catalyzed by the second-generation catalyst 2G2[TEG].
However the chemical yield of 4a when using 2G2[TEG] was some-
what lower than that with the use of the first-generation
2G1[TEG], probably due to steric hindrance of the second-genera-
tion dendron (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). Next, by employing the
first-generation 2G1[TEG] in water, the aqueous media carboxyla-
tive cyclization proceeded smoothly to provide 4a in a shorter time
(24 h, 85%; Table 1, entry 5). However, also in these cases carried
out in water, the chemical yield for the second-generation
2G2[TEG] was somewhat lower than that for the first-generation
2G1[TEG] (Table 1, entries 5 and 6). On the other hand, by employ-
ing AuCl(IPr) as a catalyst in water at room temperature, the chem-
ical yield of 4a was poor (2%; Table 1, entry 7). Under these
reaction conditions, even with the addition of 8 mol % of tri(ethyl-
ene glycol) dimethyl ether with the same amount of TEG moieties
of 2G1[TEG], 4a was obtained in only 1% yield (Table 1, entry 8).
From these results, it can be concluded that the inclusion of
NHC–gold(I) complex with an amphiphilic dendrimer is essential
to the aqueous media carboxylative cyclization of propargylic
amines with CO2.
O
O
O X
O X
O X
O X
CH2
G2[X]:
G1[X]:
CH2
O X
X (CH2CH2O)3CH3 (TEG)
Figure 1. Structural formulas of Gn[X] dendrons (n = 1, 2).
Gn[TEG]-Br
CsF–Celite
Gn[TEG] N+ N Gn[TEG]
N
NH
DMF, 90 ºC, 24 h
Br–
Gn[TEG]
G1: 95%
G2: 98%
1
Ag2O
AuCl(SMe2)
N
N
Gn[TEG]
Gn[TEG]
ClCH2CH2Cl
70 ºC, 5 h
rt, 3 h
Au
Cl
Gn[TEG]
We next synthesized the first-generation of other amphiphilic
dendritic NHC–gold(I) catalysts having either penta(ethylene
glycol) or dodeca(ethylene glycol) units at the peripheral layer
2G1[PEG] and 2G1[DEG], which were prepared according to the
procedure similar to that used for 2G1[TEG] (Scheme 2).13 All
transformations were carried out in fair chemical yields for both
catalysts.14
2
G1: 91%
G2: 85%
Scheme 1. Preparation of 2Gn[TEG] (n = 1, 2).
G1[X]-Br
Table 1
CsF–Celite
Carboxylative cyclization of propargylic amine 3a with CO2 catalyzed by 2Gn[TEG]a
G1[X] N+ N G1[X]
N
NH
DMF, 90 ºC, 24 h
Ph
Br–
G1[X]
2Gn[TEG] (2 mol%)
CO2 (0.1 MPa)
1
Ph
X (CH CH O) CH (PEG)
=
2
2
5
3
O
N
HN
PEG: 94%
DEG: 73%
Solvent, Temp.
(CH2CH2O)12CH3 (DEG)
O
3a
4a
Ag2O
AuCl(SMe2)
rt, 3 h
G1[X]
N
N G1[X]
Entry
Au catalyst
Solvent
Temp. (°C)
Time (h)
Yieldb (%)
ClCH2CH2Cl
70 ºC, 24 h
1c
2
3
4
5
AuCl(IPr)
2G1[TEG]
2G1[TEG]
2G2[TEG]
2G1[TEG]
2G2[TEG]
AuCl(IPr)
AuCl(IPr)
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
40
40
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
48
48
48
48
24
24
24
24
76
47
82
73
85
72
2
Au
Cl
2G1[X]
PEG: 90%
DEG: 92%
6
7
8d
1
Scheme 2. Preparation of 2G1[X].
a
Reaction conditions: 2Gn[TEG] (2 mol %), 3a (0.8 mmol), solvent (1 M based on
3a), carried out at 40 °C or at room temperature for the indicated time under
atmospheric pressure of CO2 (0.1 MPa).
As shown in Table 2, by employing three amphiphilic dendritic
NHC–gold(I) catalysts 2G1[X] (X = TEG, PEG, DEG), respectively, the
aqueous media carboxylative cyclization of 3a with CO2 was car-
ried out at room temperature for 24 h. As a result, the dendritic
NHC–gold(I) catalyst having the penta(ethylene glycol) unit
2G1[PEG] afforded the highest chemical yield (Table 2, entries 3
and 4). Even in the case of using 1 mol % of the catalyst, 2G1[PEG]
afforded a fair chemical yield of 4a (82%; Table 2, entry 4).
We subsequently performed the aqueous media carboxylative
cyclization of various propargylic amines by employing 1 mol %
of the dendritic NHC–gold(I) catalysts having penta(ethylene
glycol) units 2G1[PEG], as shown in Table 3.15 In the cases of the
internal propargylic amines except for 3a, the carboxylative
cyclization reactions were carried out for 48 h to provide the
corresponding 2-oxazolidinones 4 in acceptable chemical yields
b
Determined by integration of 1H NMR absorptions referring to an internal
standard.
c
Cited from Ref. 4a.
d
Carried out in the presence of 8 mol % of tri(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether.
First, by employing 2 mol % of the first-generation catalyst
2G1[TEG], the carboxylative cyclization of N,N-methyl(3-phenyl-
propargyl) amine 3a was carried out under atmospheric pressure
of CO2 (0.1 MPa) in methanol at 40 °C for 48 h. However in this
case, the reaction proceeded heterogeneously to provide the
corresponding 2-oxazolidinone 4a in a rather low chemical yield
(47%; Table 1, entry 2). In contrast, by employing 2G1[TEG] as a
catalyst at room temperature, 4a was obtained in a fair chemical
yield (82%; Table 1, entry 3). Generally, poly(ethylene glycol)