4
Tetrahedron
S. M.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Comte, P.; Liska, P.; Cevey, L.; Costa, E.;
Shklover, V.; Spiccia, L.; Deacon, G. B.; Bignozzi, C. A.; Grätzel, M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 1613-1624.
iodide, 0.1 M guanidinium thiocyanate, 0.03 M I2, 0.05 M LiI,
and 0.5 M tert-butylpyridine in a mixed solvent of acetonitrile
and valeronitrile (85/15, v/v). The plots of current density-
voltage (J-V) characteristics and the incident monochromatic
photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) are shown in
Figures 2c and d, and the resulting data are summarized in Table
1. The IPCE spectra of all the cells are well compatible with the
absorption spectra of the dyes. The 2-based cell shows the
broadest IPCE (>60% in the range 365-510 nm with a maximum
of 70% at 445 nm) spectrum. Under standard AM 1.5G 100 mW
3.
4.
(a) Imahori, H.; Umeyama, T.; Ito, S. Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 1809-
1818. (b) Sirithip, K.; Morada, S.; Namuangruk, S.; Keawin, T.;
Jungsuttiwong, S.; Sudyoadsuk, T.; Promarak, V. Tetrahedron Lett.,
2013, 54, 2435-2439.
(a) Liang, M.; Chen, J. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 3453-3488. (b)
Sudyoadsuk, T.; Pansay, S.; Morada, S.; Rattanawan, R.; Namuangruk,
S.; Kaewin, T.; Jungsuttiwong, S.; Promarak, V. Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2013, 23, 5051-5053.
5.
6.
Zhang, G.; Bala, H.; Cheng, Y.; Shi, D.; Lv, X.; Yu, Q.; Wang, P.
Chem. Commun., 2009, 2198-2200.
Yella, A.; Lee, H.-W.; Tsao, H. N.; Yi, C.; Chandiran, A. K.;
Nazeeruddin, Md. K.; Diau, E. W.-G.; Yeh, C.-Y.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.;
Grätzel, M. Science, 2011, 334, 629-634.
cm-2 illumination, the 2-based cell gave
a short-circuit
photocurrent density (Jsc) of 7.14 mA/cm2, an open-circuit
voltage (Voc) of 0.62 V, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.72,
corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 3.19%,
while the 1-based cell showed a lower Jsc of 3.70 mA cm-2
resulting in a lower η of 1.64%. Both DSSCs exhibit greater cell
performance than that of simple D-π-A dye 3 (Jsc = 2.78
mA/cm2, η = 1.23%). The higher cell performance (wide IPCE,
high Jsc and η) from 2 could be rationalized from its wide
absorption spectrum and high ε value, i.e., greater LHE.
7.
8.
9.
Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Angelis, F. D.; Fantacci, S.; Selloni, A.; Viscardi,
G.; Liska, P.; Ito, S.; Takeru, B.; Grätzel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005,
127, 16835-16847.
Chen, C.-Y.; Wang, M.; Li, J.-Y.; Pootrakulchote, N.; Alibabaei, L.;
Ngoc-le, C.-H.; Decoppet, J.-D.; Tsai, J.-H.; Grätzel, C.; Wu, C.-G.;
Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Grätzel, M. ACS Nano, 2009, 3, 3103-3109.
Lee, M. M.; Teuscher, J.; Miyasaka, T.; Murakami, T. N.; Snaith, H. J.
Science, 2012, 338, 643-647.
10. Kim, B.-G.; Zhen, C.-G.; Jeong, E. J.; Kieffer, J.; Kim, J. Adv. Funct.
Mater., 2012, 22, 1606-1612.
Despite dye 2 possessing a wide absorption range with high ε,
its DSSC performance is still lower than the fabricated reference
N719 cell (η = 8.07%), and the reported efficient organic dye (η
= 9.8% C217).5 Quantum chemistry calculations were performed
at the TDDFT/B3LYP/6-31G (d,p) level in order to understand
the electronic structures of dye 2.18 As depicted in Figure 3, in the
LUMO, the excited electrons localize on the entire bisthiophene
and cyanoacrylic acid moieties. In the HOMO, electrons are able
to delocalize over the carbazole and fluorene π-linkage through
the lone electron pair of the N-atom of the carbazole. On
overlapping of these energy levels, discontinuation of the
electron density (unfilled space) on the phenyl ring is observed,
leading to an inefficient electron transfer from the donor to
acceptor. This is due to a twist conformation between the
fluorene and phenyl rings. It has been found that in most cases of
efficient organic dyes, an overlap of the electron density of the
HOMO and LUMO are observed and are significant.4,5,11,19 This
might be one of the reasons for the lower conversion efficiency
of dye 2. Additional DFT calculations predict that if the phenyl in
the π-spacer is removed or replaced by either a thiophene ring or
an alkyne bond to form dyes 10-12, a larger overlap of the
electron density of the HOMO and LUMO is observed,
indicating more efficient electron transfer which could lead to
better dyes. To confirm this idea, experimental studies on
compounds 10-12 are under investigation in our laboratory.
In summary, we have successfully designed, synthesized and
characterized new D-π-A-π-A type organic dyes 1 and 2 as
DSSCs. The dyes possess a wide absorption range with high ε
values and can be used as sensitizers in DSSCs with an η value
of 3.19% being achieved. This work suggests that further
structural modification of this type of dye molecule should lead
to a promising candidate for efficient DSSCs.
11. (a) Zhang, M.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, D.; Wang, P. Chem. Sci., 2011,
2, 1401-1406. (b) Namuangruk, S.; Fukuda, R.; Ehara, M.; Meeprasert,
J.; Khanasa, T.; Morada, S.; Kaewin, T.; Jungsuttiwong, S.;
Sudyoadsuk, T.; Promarak, V. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 25653-
25663.
12. Peng, Q.; Park, K.; Lin, T.; Durstock, M.; Dai, L. J. Phys. Chem. B,
2008, 112, 2801-2808.
13. Characterization data for 1: m.p. >250 oC, FT-IR (KBr, ν, cm-1): 3394
(O-H), 3042, 2926, 2856, 2210 (C≡N), 1637 (C=O), 1600, 1547, 1490,
1473, 1363, 1250, 944, 807; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3/DMSO-d6, δ,
ppm): 8.31 (2H, s), 7.30-8.16 (24H, m), 7.21 (1H, d, J = 15.7 Hz), 6.95
(1H, d, J = 16.5 Hz), 2.08 (4H, s), 1.41 (18H, s), 1.05-0.72 (22H, m).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3/DMSO-d6, δ, ppm): 159.8, 157.0, 152.0,
151.8, 142.8, 139.1, 129.4, 129.1, 123.8, 123.2, 121.3, 116.6, 109.3,
107.6, 55.6, 34.8, 32.2, 31.7, 31.4, 29.4, 23.9, 22.5, 22.4 14.2. HRMS
calcd for C74H74N3O3S2: m/z 1116.5172; found: m/z 1116.5824 [MH+].
-1
2: m.p. >250 oC, FT-IR (KBr, ν, cm ): 3421 (O-H), 3052, 2926, 2856,
2201 (C≡N), 1637 (C=O), 1600, 1537, 1490, 1473, 1418, 1363, 1250,
1203, 994, 807; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3/DMSO-d6, δ, ppm): 8.23
(2H, s), 7.26-8.06 (24H, m), 7.07 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz), 6.85 (1H, d, J =
14.4 Hz), 2.09 (4H, s), 1.39 (18H, s), 1.02-0.70 (22H, m); 13C NMR (75
MHz, CDCl3/DMSO-d6, δ, ppm): 164.4, 159.0, 158.5, 156.0, 152.8,
151.8, 142.8, 142.7, 142.3, 140.2, 139.5, 139.1, 138.8, 137.6, 137.0,
136.7, 134.4, 133.1, 131.5, 130.3, 129.1, 127.7, 127.5, 126.3, 126.5,
125.8, 125.4, 123.9, 123.2, 121.7, 121.4, 121.3, 120.9, 119.3, 116.8,
115.7, 115.7, 109.3, 107.6, 57.9, 55.6, 34.8, 32.2, 31.3, 29.3, 23.9, 22.4,
14.2; HRMS calcd for C75H73N4O3S2: m/z 1141.5124; found: m/z
1141.2758 [MH+].
3: m.p. 220-221 oC; FT-IR (KBr, ν, cm-1): 3520 (O-H), 3037, 2955,
2926, 2854, 2217 (C≡N), 1654 (C=O), 1637, 1617, 1490, 1474, 1364,
1034, 877, 810; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3/DMSO-d6, δ, ppm): 8.41
(1H, s), 8.14 (2H, s), 8.02 (1H, m), 7.79 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.65-7.50
(7H, m), 7.40-7.33 (5H, m), 2.03 (4H, s), 1.42 (18H, s), 1.27-0.73 (22H,
m); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3/DMSO-d6, δ, ppm): 168.6, 152.9, 151.9,
145.2, 140.8, 139.2, 139.1, 138.5, 137.3, 131.5, 131.0, 127.7, 127.5,
126.5, 125.4, 123.5, 123.4, 121.4, 121.3, 120.9, 120.4, 116.3, 109.1,
55.6, 40.3, 34.7, 32.0, 31.8, 29.9, 24.06, 22.2, 14.0; HRMS calcd for
C55H63N2O2: m/z 783.4890: found: m/z 783.4377 [MH+].
Acknowledgements
14. Lu, M.; Liang, M.; Han, H.-Y.; Sun, Z.; Xue, S. J. Phys. Chem. C,
2011, 115, 274-281.
15. Grätzel, M. Platinum Metals Rev., 1994, 38, 151-159.
This work was financially supported from SUT (Grant No. 1-
102-56-12-02). We also thank the support from the post-doctoral
scholarship from SUT and the Higher Education Research
Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand,
OHEC, and PERCH-CIC.
16. Lee, J.-J.; Rahman, M. M.; Sarker, S.; Nath, D. Advances in Composite
Materials for Medicine and Nanotechnology, InTech 2011, 181-210.
17. Tsai, M.-S.; Hsu, Y.-C.; Lin, J. T.; Chen, H.-C.; Hsu, C.-P. J. Phys.
Chem. C, 2007, 111, 18785-18793.
18. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M.
A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.;
Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.;
Izmaylov, A. F.; Bloino, J.; Zheng, G.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.;
Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima,
T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Montgomery, Jr., J. A.;
Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E.;
References and notes
1.
2.
Grätzel, M. Nature, 2001, 414, 338-344.
(a) Qin, Y.; Peng, Q. Int. J. Photoenergy, 2012, Article ID 291579, 21
pages. (b) Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Péchy, P.; Renouard, T.; Zakeeruddin,