ChemComm
Communication
manganese tetramer is shown to be sluggish which in turn enables
a high proton reduction catalytic rate to be achieved.
Although the overpotentials of many [FeFe] hydrogenase
model complexes such as the diiron dithiolato bridged complexes
fall within 0.2 V and 1.1 V, very few complexes actually exhibited
overpotentials smaller than 0.6 V.5 However complexes with low
overpotentials are also less efficient in generating large proton
reduction currents. The TOF for proton reduction catalysed by a
diiron complex16 can reach 58 000 sꢀ1 while the highest TOF reported
for a nickel complex in dry and wet CH3CN were 33 000 sꢀ1 and
106 000 sꢀ1, respectively, with an overpotential of 0.625 V.13,14
A comparison with these iron and nickel models shows that
complex 1 is indeed a fairly efficient catalyst for proton reduction
with an overpotential of 0.61 V. However if the homoconjugation
effect of TFA is considered, the overpotential would become
0.79 V while Helm’s method would give a value of 0.69 V.17,18
In summary, we have shown that a manganese complex, which
Fig. 4 Proposed mechanism for the proton reduction process based on
experimental results.
concentration, which suggests a first-order dependence of the is structurally similar to the active site of [FeFe] hydrogenase, can
catalytic rate on acid concentration. At the highest concentration catalyze proton reduction with high TOF. The unusual structure of
ic
complex 1 contains a dinuclear manganese anion bridged by three
m-SPh groups and a mono-manganese cation where Mn(I) is
coordinated by three 2,20-bipyridine ligands. A simple mechanism
showing how proton reduction takes place electrochemically is also
proposed. We have demonstrated that the manganese-only model
complex can also catalyze proton reduction at least as efficient as
some iron or nickel model complexes.
of CF3COOH (300 mM) studied, a
value of 152 was obtained,
ip
which corresponds to a turnover frequency of 44 600 sꢀ1 at 295 K.
From the CV measurements, the anion appears to play a
more important role in reducing the overpotential of proton
reduction, hence the anion-catalysed mechanism is studied in
more detail here. From the sequence of the process, the proton
reduction mechanism catalyzed by 1 is proposed to be a CECE
(chemical–electrochemical–chemical–electrochemical) process
similar to that in iron and nickel model complexes (Fig. 4).
The anion is first protonated to form intermediate 1H+.
Then 1H+ is reduced at ꢀ1.2 V vs. Fc+/Fc to generate a hydride
species 1H by an intrahydride transfer from sulfur to manganese.14
A second proton reacts with 1H to generate 1H2. Finally, dihydro-
gen is released and the anion is regenerated upon electron
reduction at ꢀ1.5 V vs. Fc+/Fc to complete the catalytic cycle.
To gain more insight into the mechanism, the reactivity and
stability of 1 in the presence of acids are first studied via
infrared spectroscopy. When one equivalent CF3COOH is
added to 1 in CH3CN, no change in the nCO peaks is observed
even after an hour. However, when the amount of acid is
increased to 50 equivalents, the initial peaks of 1 at 1910 cmꢀ1
and 1992 cmꢀ1 slowly decrease while two new peaks at 1932 cmꢀ1
and 2015 cmꢀ1 appear. Based on a literature search, we were able
to assign the 1932 and 2015 cmꢀ1 bands to the manganese
carbonyl tetramer Mn4(CO)12(SPh)4.15
The authors are grateful for a NUS research grant (143-000-
553-112).
Notes and references
1 D. J. Evans and C. J. Pickett, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2003, 32, 268.
´
2 A. L. De Lacey, V. M. Fernandez, M. Rousset and R. Cammack, Chem.
Rev., 2007, 107, 4304.
3 A. M. Appel, J. E. Bercaw, A. B. Bocarsly, H. Dobbek, D. L. DuBois,
M. Dupuis, J. G. Ferry, E. Fujita, R. Hille and P. J. A. Kenis, Chem.
Rev., 2013, 113, 6621.
4 F. Gloaguen and T. B. Rauchfuss, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 100.
5 G. A. N. Felton, C. A. Mebi, B. J. Petro, A. K. Vannucci, D. H. Evans,
R. S. Glass and D. L. Lichtenberger, J. Organomet. Chem., 2009, 694, 2681.
´
6 J.-F. Capon, F. Gloaguen, F. Y. Petillon, P. Schollhammer and
J. Talarmin, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2009, 253, 1476.
7 C. Tard and C. J. Pickett, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 2245.
8 L.-C. Song, J.-P. Li, Z.-J. Xie and H.-B. Song, Inorg. Chem., 2013,
52, 11618.
9 V. Fourmond, S. Canaguier, B. Golly, M. J. Field, M. Fontecave and
V. Artero, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 2417.
10 J. W. McDonald, Inorg. Chem., 1985, 24, 1734.
11 X.-L. Yu, Y.-X. Tong, X.-M. Chen and T. C. W. Mak, J. Chem.
Crystallogr., 1997, 27, 441.
The study indicates that 1 is moderately stable under acidic 12 M. Wang, J. England, T. Weyhermu¨ller and K. Wieghardt, Inorg.
Chem., 2014, 53, 2276.
13 M. L. Helm, M. P. Stewart, R. M. Bullock, M. R. DuBois and
conditions, at least within the period when cyclic voltammetric
studies were carried out. Hence the redox processes at different
D. L. DuBois, Science, 2011, 333, 863.
acid concentrations are due to 1 rather than the intermediates 14 M. Dupuis, S. Chen, S. Raugei, D. L. DuBois and R. M. Bullock,
J. Phys. Chem. A, 2011, 115, 4861.
15 M. Reyes-Lezama, R. A. Toscano and N. Zuniga-Villareal,
formed upon acidification. The tetrameric manganese cluster is
˜
probably formed from the dimerization of intermediate 1H+ upon
J. Organomet. Chem., 1996, 517, 19.
the dissociation of its benzenethiol ligand. Hence the tetramer 16 M. E. Carroll, B. E. Barton, T. B. Rauchfuss and P. J. Carroll, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 18843.
17 V. Fourmond, P.-A. Jacques, M. Fontecave and V. Artero, Inorg.
formation may represent a competing reaction step for the
reduction of intermediate 1H+ to 1H. However, our experimental
Chem., 2010, 49, 10338.
data suggest that 1H+ is relatively stable since the formation of the 18 A. M. Appel and M. L. Helm, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 630.
6632 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 6630--6632
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014