Stereoselective Synthesis of N-Substituted Iminosugars from D-Xylose Derivative
In order to obtain various N-substituted iminosugars
conveniently, alkyl was introduced by reductive amina-
tion of 2 with RCHO (R=C2H5, C3H7, C6H13, and Ar).
As the model substrate, propionaldehyde was selected to
investigate the influence of reductive reagents, solvent
and temperature on the yield of final product. The result
was summarized in Table 2.
moderate yield. Obviously, heteroaromatic aldehyde (3b)
was also a suitable substrate for the reductive amination,
which offered product in 68% yield.
The stereochemistry of the major product was de-
1
termined by the H-1H-COSY and coupling constant.
Taking compound 3g as an example, the coupling con-
stants between H2’ and H3’ (JH2’, H3’=8.7 Hz), showed
convincingly the trans-configuration between C1 and
3’-OBn. Meanwhile the result was further supported by
Table 2 Optimization of reductive amination conditionsa
Temperature Yieldb/%
the coupling constants between H3’ and H4’ (JH3’, H4’
=
Entry
Reagent
Solvent
8.7 Hz), which was the known trans-configuration.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
NaBH(OAc)3 DCM/HOAc
NaBH(OAc)3 DCM/HOAc
NaBH(OAc)3 MeOH
0 ℃-r.t.
reflux
15
trace
54
Conclusions
−20 ℃
In summary, we described an efficient approach for
the synthesis of various N-substituted iminosugars from
D-xylose derivative. A series of N-alkyl substituted
iminosugars C-glycosides were synthesized in good
yields with high stereoselectivity. Meanwhile, the
method is applied to the synthesis of other analogues.
The assessment to the biological activities of these
compounds is in progress.
NaBH(OAc)3 MeOH/4 Å M.S.c
65
−20 ℃
NaBH(OAc)3 MeOH
NaBH(OAc)3 MeOH/4 Å M.S.c 0 ℃-r.t.
0 ℃-r.t.
77
86
NaBH3CN
NaBH3CN
MeOH
0 ℃-r.t.
0 ℃-r.t.
trace
trace
MeOH/HOAc
a
Reaction condition: substrate 2 (0.1 mmol), solvent (2 mL),
reductive reagent (0.3 mmol). b Isolated yield. c Fresh activated.
Acknowledgement
As showed in Table 2, NaBH(OAc)3 in DCM/HOAc
was selected as reaction system preferentially due to
their excellent performance, during our research on
double reductive amination between glycosyl-1,4-di-
carbonyl compounds and amines.[14,15] However, the
desired product was only obtained in 15% isolated yield
at 0 ℃to r.t., while only trace amount of the product
was obtained when the reaction was carried out in reflux
condition (Table 2, Entries 1 and 2). Encouragingly,
when MeOH was employed as a solvent, and the reac-
tion was carried out at −20 ℃, the reductive amination
product was obtained in 54% yield (Table 2, Entry 3).
The yield was further improved to 65% when 4 Å M.S.
was added to the reaction mixture (Table 2, Entry 4).
However, when NaBH3CN was used, only trace amount
of the product was detected (Table 2, Entry 7). Finally,
it was found that the desired product can be obtained in
86% yield when the reaction was performed at 0 ℃ to
r.t. (Table 2, Entry 6).
With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, reduc-
tive amination was further investigated with different
kinds of aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes (Scheme 1). It
must be mentioned that, the starting material compound
2, which contains a pair of anomers, is very hard to be
separated by flash chromatograph, therefore, we used
the anomeric mixture (major/minor=5∶1) as the start-
ing material to evaluate the scope of the reaction.
This work was supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21372215 and
20972151).
References
[1] Ichikawa, M.; Ichikawa, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1995, 3, 161.
[2] Kim, Y. J.; Ichikawa, M.; Ichikawa, Y. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
2599.
[3] (a) Ichikawa, Y.; Igarashi, Y.; Ichikawa, M.; Suhara, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3007; (b) Zechel, D. L.; Boraston, A. B.;
Gloster, T.; Boraston, C. M.; Macdonald, J. M.; Tilbrook, D. M. G.;
Stick, R. V.; Davies, G. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14313; (c)
Stocker, B. L.; Dangerfield, E. M.; Win-Mason, A. L.; Haslett, G.
W.; Timmer, M. S. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 1615.
[4] Butters, T. D.; Broek, L. A. G. M.; Fleet, G. W. J.; Krulle, T. M.;
Wormald, M. R.; Dwek, R. A.; Platt, F. M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2000, 11, 113.
[5] Horii, S.; Fukase, H.; Matsuo, T.; Kameda, Y.; Asano, N.; Matsui, K.
J. Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 1038.
[6] Butters, T. D.; Dwek, R. A.; Platt, F. M. Curr. Top. Med. Chem.
2003, 3, 561.
[7] Papandreou, M. J.; Barbouche, R.; Guieu, R.; Kieny, M. P.;
Fenouillet, E. Mol. Pharamacol. 2002, 61, 186.
[8] Mitrakou, A.; Tountas, N.; Raptis, A. E.; Bauer, R. J.; Schulz, H.;
Raptis, S. A. Diabet. Med. 1998, 15, 657.
[9] Butters, T. D.; Dwek, R. A.; Platt, F. M. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100,
4683.
[10] (a) Inouye, S.; Tsuruoka, T.; Niida, T. J. Antibiot. 1966, 19, 288; (b)
Compain, P.; Chagnault, V.; Martin, O. R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2009, 20, 672; (c) Borges de Melo, E.; da Silveira Gomes, A.;
Carvalho, I. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 10277; (d) Bussiere, A.;
Barragan-Montero, V.; Oumzil, K.; Winum, J.-Y.; Montero, J.-L.
Synlett 2009, 6, 978; (e) Felpin, F.-X.; Lebreton, J. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 3693; (f) Pearson, M. S. M.; Mathe-Allainmat, M.;
Fargeas, V.; Lebreton, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 4177; (g)
Cardona, F.; Goti, A.; Brandi, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 1551.
[11] (a) Sandbhor, M.; Bhasin, M.; Williams, D. T.; Hsieh, M.; Wu, S. H.;
Fortunately, after reductive amination, two anomers
can be easily separated by chromatograph and the de-
sired products were obtained in 53% to 86% isolated
yields. It was found that the aliphatic aldehydes
achieved the products in higher yields compared to
aromatic aldehydes (3a, 3c, 3e v.s. 3f-3l). Long-chain
aliphatic aldehydes also gave the desired product (3d) in
Chin. J. Chem. 2014, 32, 361—364
© 2014 SIOC, CAS, Shanghai, & WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
363