Communication
ChemComm
reference compounds significantly higher IEs of 63 eV for the
The assignment of 1.5 negative charges to both PDI ligands
Ir(4f7/2) components were recorded (Table 1). Considering a in Ir2N adheres to the strongly delocalized (Robin-Day class III)
typical increase of the IE of ca. 1 eV upon the increase of the electronic structure evidenced from the electrochemical data.
oxidation state by 1 unit, it can be assumed with some certainty
The nitrido iridium systems display strongly delocalized
that the oxidation states of the Ir centers in Ir2N+, Ir2N and electronic structures. The LOBA allowed the assignment of
Ir2Nꢀ are definitely lower than +3. Based on the comparison with the formal oxidation states of the Ir centers and revealed non-
the Ir(I) reference compounds IrCl and Ir2N3+ a d8-configuration innocent PDI ligands, N+ nitrido nitrogen atoms and electron-
is therefore suggested for the Ir centers in the dinuclear com- rich d8-configured Ir(I) centers in the m-nitrido bridged systems.
plexes Ir2N+, Ir2N and Ir2Nꢀ.
Their reactivity will be reported in due course.
The LOBA unveiled essentially identical situations for the
metal centers in all bridging m-nitrido systems. The electrons of
the LMOs corresponding to the dz2, dyz and dxy orbitals could
be safely assigned to the iridium centers leading to (at least)
d6-electron configurations. As noted for the terminal nitrido
complex IrN, the MPAs for the remaining LMOs (dxz)
also revealed lower values for the Ir centers (62–64%) with
contributions of 36–38% from the Nnitrido atom. This makes an
unambiguous assignment of the two bonding electrons to
either of the bonding partners difficult. If evenly shared, this
would result in d7-electron configurations for the Ir centers.
The LOBA also revealed the aforementioned PDI ligand based
LMOs, elucidating reduced, i.e. non-innocent PDI ligands in
the nitrido model systems for Ir2N+, IrN and IrNꢀ. This is
consistent with the MO diagram for the open shell system
Ir2N+ showing that additional electrons enter PDI based
orbitals, which is also reflected in the experimental and calcu-
lated bond distances and orders of the Cpy–Cimi and Cimi–Nimi
bonds for the model systems Ir2N+, Ir2N and Ir2Nꢀ (see ESI†).
This view is further corroborated from the inspection of the
M–Nnitrido bond distances and orders, which display only small
changes upon addition of electrons.
Notes and references
1 Reviews: J. F. Berry, Comments Inorg. Chem., 2009, 30, 28;
C. T. Saouma and J. Peters, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2011, 255, 920.
2 M. G. Scheibel, B. Askevold, F. W. Heinemann, E. J. Reijerse, B. de
Bruin and S. Schneider, Nat. Chem., 2012, 4, 552; M. G. Scheibel,
Y. Wu, A. C. Stu¨ckl, L. Krause, E. Carl, D. Stalke, B. de Bruin and
S. Schneider, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 17719.
¨
3 J. Schoffel, A. Y. Rogachev, S. DeBeer George and P. Burger, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 4734.
ˇ
¨
ˇ
4 J. Schoffel, N. Susnjar, S. Nu¨ckel, D. Sieh and P. Burger, Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem., 2010, 4911.
5 D. Sieh, M. Schlimm, L. Andernach, F. Angersbach, S. Nu¨ckel,
ˇ
¨
ˇ
J. Schoffel, N. Susnjar and P. Burger, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2012, 444.
¨
6 D. Sieh, J. Schoffel and P. Burger, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 9512.
7 D. Sieh and P. Burger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 3971.
8 B. de Bruin, E. Bill, E. Bothe, T. Weyhermu¨ller and K. Wieghardt,
Inorg. Chem., 2000, 39, 2936; Q. Knijnenburg, S. Gambarotta and
P. H. M. Budzelaar, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2006, 5442;
S. C. Bart, K. Chłopek, E. Bill, M. W. Bouwkamp, E. Lobkovsky,
F. Neese, K. Wieghardt and P. J. Chirik, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,
128, 13901.
9 A. J. W. Thom, E. J. Sundstrom and M. Head-Gordon, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 2009, 11, 11297.
10 M. Ciechanowicz and A. C. Skapski, Chem. Commun., 1969, 574;
¨
K. Dehnicke and J. Strahle, Angew. Chem., 1981, 93, 451;
S. Matsumura, K. Shikano, T. Oi, N. Suzuki and H. Nagao, Inorg.
Chem., 2008, 47, 9125; H.-F. Ip, Y.-M. So, H. K. Lee, I. D. Williams
and W.-H. Leung, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2013, 3289; C. Newton,
K. D. Edwards, J. W. Ziller and N. M. Doherty, Inorg. Chem., 1999,
38, 4032; E. K. Huang, W.-M. Cheung, H. H. Y. Sung, I. D. Williams
and W.-H. Leung, Organometallics, 2013, 32, 733.
Taking the XPS data into account, the following electron
configuration is anticipated for the cationic complex Ir2N+:
[(PDIꢀ1)(Ir+(d8))2-m-N+(s2p2)].
Note that in this assignment the electrons of the LMO
corresponding to the dxz-orbital (vide supra) are fully assigned
to the iridium centers. For the neutral and anionic congeners
the electron configurations shown below are proposed:
Ir2N: [(PDIꢀ1.5)(Ir+(d8))2-m-N+(s2p2)]
11 C. Creutz, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 1983, 30, 1.
12 A magnetic moment of meff = 3.05 mB was derived for Ir2N in
THF solution at RT, providing some arguments for a quartet state
(S = 3/2).
13 M. B. Robin and P. Day, Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem., 1967, 10, 247.
14 L. W. Pignolet and W. D. Horrocks Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1969,
91, 397.
Ir2Nꢀ: [(PDIꢀ2)(Ir+(d8))2-m-N+(s2p2)]
8738 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 8735--8738
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014