Journal of the American Chemical Society
Page 4 of 5
no significantly different reaction rate of EP-AA and ER-AA was
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
observed (eq 3), which is obviously different from individual
reactions (Figure 2A). The possible reason is that the
concentration of int.II of EP-AA is higher than that of ER-AA,
but the transmetallation of ER-AA (k3) is faster than EP-AA. Thus,
the k3[int.II] value of EP-AA is reasonably close with the ER-AA,
resulting the similar yields of 4a and 5 in one pot reaction. This
observation is more consistent with the path a, and against the
path b.18
Xu, J.; Fu, Y.; Luo, D.; Jiang, Y.; Xiao, B.; Liu, Z.; Gong, T.; Liu, L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15300. (c) Wang, X.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, S.; Feng,
J.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16410. (d)
Shimizu, R.; Egami, H.; Hamashima, Y.; Sodeoka, M. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2012, 51, 4577. (e) Mizuta, S.; Galicia-López, O.; Engle, K. M.;
Verhoog, S.; Wheelhouse, K.; Rassias, G.; Gouverneur, V. Chem. Eur. J.
2012, 18, 8583. (f) Janson, P. G.; Ghoneim, I.; IIchenko, N. O.; Szabó, K.
J. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2882. (g) Shimizu, R.; Egami,H.; Hamashima, Y.;
Sodeoka, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 4577. (h) Li, Y.; Studer. A.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8221. (i) Yasu, Y.; Koike, T.; Akita, M.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 9567. (j) Zhu, R.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12462. (k) Zhu, R.; Buckwald, S. L. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12655. (l) Feng, C.; Loh, T.-P. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 3458.
(m) Mizuta, S.; Verhoog, S.; Engle, K. M.; Khotavivattana, K. M.;
O’Duill, M.; Wheelhouse, K.; Rassias, G.; Médebielle, M.; Gouverneur,
V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2505. (n) Wu, X.; Chu, L.; Qing, F.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2198. (o) Egami, H.; Kawamura, S.;
Miyazaki, A.; Sodeoka, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7841. (p)
Feng, C.; Loh, T.-P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12414. (q) Ilchenko,
N. O.; Janson, P. G.; Szabó, K. J.Chem. Comm. 2013, 49, 6614.
(5) Mu, X.; Wu, T.; Wang, H.-Y.; Guo, Y.-L.; Liu, G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2012, 134, 878.
(6) (a) Egami, H.; Shimizu, R.; Sodeoka, M. J. Fluorine Chem. 2013,
152, 51. (b) Egami, H.; Shimizu, R.; Kawamura, S.;Sodeoka, M. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4000.
(7) (a) Kong, W.; Casimiro, M.; Fuentes, N.; Merino, E.; Nevado, C.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 13086. (b) Kong, W.; Casimiro, M.;
Merino, E.; Nevado, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 14480.
(8) (a) Liu, X.; Xiong, F.; Huang, X.; Xu, L.; Li, P.; Wu, X. Angew.
Chem. 2013, 125, 7100; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 6962. (b) Chen,
Z.-M.; Bai, W.; Wang, S.-H.; Yang, B.-M. Tu, Y.-Q.; Zhang, F.-M.
Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 9963; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 9781. (c)
Egami, H.; Shimizu,R.; Usui, Y.; Sodeoka, M. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49,
73465.
(9) (a)Wang, F.; Qi, X.; Liang, Z.; Chen, P.; Liu, G. Angew.Chem., Int.
Ed. 2014, 53, 1881. (b) Liang, Z.; Wang, F.; Chen, P.; Liu, G. J. Fluorine.
Chem. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2014.04.004. (c) Ilchenko, N. O.;
Janson, P. G.; Szabó, K. J. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 11087. b) He, Y.-T.;
Li, L.-H.; Yang, Y.-F.; Zhou, Z.-Z.; Hua, H.-L.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liang, Y.-M.
Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 270.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
In summary, we have developed a novel copper-catalyzed
intermolecular trifluoromethylarylation of alkenes under mild
reaction condition. Diverse alkenes and arylboronic acids were
compatible to the reaction condition for the efficient synthesis of
CF3-containing diarylmethane derivatives efficiently. Preliminary
mechanistic studies revealed the mutual activation process
between arylboronic acid and the CF3+ reagent is vital to generate
initial CF3 radical. And transmetallation of ArB(OH)2 to Cu(II)
was involved as a key step, and the final C-C bond formation is
derived from a Cu(III) species. Further application and more
mechanistic investigation of this process are in progress.
Supporting Information
Synthetic procedures, characterization, mechanistic study data and
additional data. This material is available free of charge via the
Corresponding Author
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are grateful for financial support from 973 program (No.
2011CB808700), NSFC (Nos. 21225210, 21202185, and
21121062), STCSM (11JC1415000), and the CAS/SAFEA
International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams.
(10) For details, see the Supporting Information (SI).
(11) For the side product 4a’ generation (entries 5-6, table 1) from
benzyl radical species and dioxygen, see: Deb, A.; Manna, S.; Modak, A.;
Patra, T.; Maity, S.; Maiti, D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 9747.
(12) In the absence of arylboronic acid, no trifluoromethylation of
alkenes was occurred, and CF3+ reagent 2a was quantitatively recovered.
(13) No significant interaction between ester type Togni’s reagent 2b
with 3a was observed. For details, see SI.
(14) The oxidation of Cu(II) by alkyl radical to give Cu(III) was also
proposed, see: (a) Ye, Y.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134,
9034. (b) Tran, B. L.; Li, B.; Driess, M.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2014, 136, 2555.
(15) The reductive elimination of Cu(III) to form C-C bond, see: (a)
Wang, Z.-L.; Zhao, L.; Wang, M.-X. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 9418. (b)
Wang, Z.-L.; Zhao, L.; Wang, M.-X. Org. Lett. 2012, 48, 9418.
( 16 ) The slow transmetallation of ArB(OH)2 to Cu(II) was also
reported by Stahl, see: (a) King, A. E.; Brunold, T. C.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5044. And the transmetallation of ER-AA with
Cu(II) exhibits faster rate than that of EP-AA, see: (b) King, A. E.; Ryland,
B. L.; Brunold, T. C.; Stahl, S. S. Organometallics 2012, 31, 7948.
(17) The reaction rate was increased by addition of MeOH. It is
possible that addition of MeOH could accelerate transmetallation step, see
SI.
REFERENCES
( 1 ) (a) Smart, B. E. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1555. (b) Filler, R.;
Kobayashi, Y. Biomedicinal Aspects of Fluorine Chemistry; Elsevier:
Amsterdam, 1982. (c) Welch, J. T.; Eswarakrishman, S. Eds. Fluorine in
Bioorganic Chemistry; Wiley: New York, 1991. (d) Banks, R. E.; Smart,B.
E.; Tatlow, J. C. Eds. Organofluorine Chemistry: Principles and
Commercial Applications; Plenum Press: New York, 1994. (e) Purser, S.;
Moore, P. R.; Swallow, S., Gouverneur, V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37,
320.
(2) For reviews for trifluoromethylation, see: (a) Schlosser, M. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5432. (b) Ma, J.-A.; Cahard, D. J. Fluorine Chem.
2007, 128, 975. (c) Ma, J.-A.; Cahard, D. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, PR1. (d)
Tomashenko, O. A.; Grushin, V. V. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 4475. (e)
Studer, A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8950.
(3) (a) Chen, P.; Liu G. Synthesis 2013, 45, 2919. (b) Ye, Y.; Sanford,
M. S. Synlett 2012, 23, 2005. (c) Liu, T.; Shen, Q. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2012, 34, 6679. (d) Wu, X.-F.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M. Chem.–Asian.
J. 2012, 7, 1744.
(4) For recent copper catalyzed trifluoromethylation of alkenes, see: (a)
Parsons, A. T.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 9120. (b)
(18) Reviewer raised an possible alternative pathway, which involves a
initial oxidation of Cu(I) by int.I to give a CuIIICF3, and subsequently
undergoes
a rate-determining transmetallation with ArB(OH)2. The
formed ArCuIIICF3 complex could further release ArCuII and CF3 radical,
which latter could react with alkenes to generate alkyl radical, and
recombine with ArCu(II) to generate int.IV. For more details of this
mechanism, see ref. 9c and the SI.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment