ChemComm
Communication
Table 3 Regioselective preparation of intermediate 3a–Li and quenching
with electrophiles in ChCl-containing DES mixtures
and 4-chlorobenzaldehyde, which were shown to react sluggishly
in Et2O, furnished the corresponding hydroxyalkylated THF
derivatives 4o and p in 90% and 80% yields, respectively
(Table 2). Similarly, in the case of chlorodiphenylphosphine, a
better yield could be achieved for 4e in CPME (85% vs. 60% in
Et2O), whereas adducts 4v and x were isolated in 57 and 33%
yields, respectively, upon deprotonating 3d in CPME followed by
interception with DMF (Table 2).
Impressively, while no reaction was observed between 3a–Li
and EtI in Et2O, the desired ortho-ethylated adduct 4b formed
in 80% yield in CPME (Table 1, entry 13). The reaction of 3a–Li
with acetone (6 equiv.) in CPME took place as well, although the
expected hydroxyalkylated compound 4n formed in 30% yield
only (Table 2). Most probably, in the case of acetone, under the
above conditions, enolization still competes a lot with the
nucleophilic addition.
Entry
Solvent
DESa
Electrophile
4 yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Et2O
ChCl–Gly (1 : 2)
ChCl–Gly (1 : 2)
ChCl–urea (1 : 2)
ChCl–H2O (1 : 2)
ChCl–urea (1 : 2)
ChCl–Gly (1 : 2)
Acetone
4n (40)
4o (75)
4o (75)
4o (33)
4e (75)
4h (90)c,d
CPME
CPME
CPME
CPME
CPME
Benzophenone
Benzophenone
Benzophenone
Ph2PCl
DMF
a
b
DES: 2 g per 1 mmol of 3a. Isolated yield after column chromato-
c
graphy, the remaining being starting material only. t-BuLi (1.9 equiv.,
1.7 M) was added to a solution of 3a in DES. Reaction time 1 min.
d
(1 : 2) DES, the yield of 4o being only 33% (Table 3, entry 4).
A recent paper by Madsen and Holm has shown that in the Chlorodiphenylphosphine (2 equiv.) also readily underwent
presence of protic reagents such as water, the rate of carbonyl nucleophilic substitution in ChCl–urea (1 : 2) to give the corre-
addition from highly reactive Grignard reagents is comparable sponding adduct 4e in 75% yield (Table 3, entry 5). Finally, we
to that of protonation by the same reagents.12 In the case of the also investigated the formation of anion 3a–Li directly in the
more polar and basic organolithium reagents, one would expect protic DES mixture in the absence of an electrophile. To this
that protonation occurs almost instantaneously. However, once end, t-BuLi (1.9 equiv., 1.7 M) was added at 0 1C and under air
an Et2O solution of 3a–Li (0.45 M) was added over an acetone– to a solution of 3a (1 mmol previously solubilized in 2 mL of
water mixture (6 equiv. each) at room temperature, it was CPME) in the ChCl–Gly (1 : 2) eutectic mixture (2 g) under
somewhat surprising to find that the desired adduct 4n could vigorous stirring. After 1 min reaction time, the reaction
still be recovered in 30% yield (Table 2). In a subsequent mixture was quenched with neat DMF (2 equiv.), remarkably
experiment in which the above ethereal solution of 3a–Li was affording the expected adduct 4h in 90% yield (Table 3, entry 6).
added to acetone alone (6 equiv.) (neat conditions), product 4n It follows from the above that the formation of intermediate
again formed in 30% yield (Table 2). This result implies that 3a–Li from t-BuLi, surprisingly, takes place competitively with
the formation of 4n is unrelated to any ‘‘rate acceleration’’ the protonolysis of the latter.
promoted by water; instead, the key to success may be the
‘‘inverse addition’’.13 However, the apparent role as a ‘‘specta- ortho-lithiation/functionalization of diaryltetrahydrofurans in
tor’’ played by water in the above addition is intriguing.14
which the THF moiety acts as an effective DMG. ortho-
In summary, we have reported the first direct regioselective
A
perusal of the literature revealed that water can act as a polar Lithiation was found to proceed smoothly using t-BuLi as the
ligand towards lithium,15 successfully competing also with base at 0 1C both in Et2O and in CPME, the latter often providing
TMEDA.15b Thus, to further assess the potential impact of better yields and selectivity compared to Et2O. In addition, we
protic solvents on organolithium chemistry, we turned our noticed that both the generation of ortho-lithiated derivative
attention to the so-called deep eutectic solvents (DESs) which 3a–Li and its trapping reactions with electrophiles could also
were introduced by Abbott and co-workers in 200316a and be fruitfully performed at 0 1C or RT, and under open air
rapidly emerged as a new generation of promising green media. conditions in eutectic mixtures of ChCl and donor molecules,
They are the result of the right combination of a hydrogen-bond such as glycerol and urea, competitively with protonolysis. Our
donor and a hydrogen-bond acceptor that form a eutectic, with next aim is to set up an enantioselective desymmetrization of
a melting point much lower than either of the individual diaryltetrahydrofurans in the presence of chiral ligands as well
components, and are known to exhibit interesting and unusual as to deeply investigate the scope of protic DES mixtures as a new
solvent properties.16b,c
eco-friendly reaction media for organolithium reactions.
This work was financially supported by the Interuniversities
Once an Et2O solution of 3a–Li (1.9 equiv., 0.5 M) was added
to acetone (6 equiv.) in a choline chloride (ChCl)–glycerol (Gly) Consortium C.I.N.M.P.I.S. We also thank Professor Saverio
(1 : 2) eutectic mixture at room temperature (RT) and under air, Florio and Professor Dietmar Stalke for valuable discussions.
adduct 4n could be recovered with a yield of 40% (Table 3, entry
1). Similarly, the addition reaction of a CPME solution of 3a–Li
(1.9 equiv., 0.5 M) to benzophenone (2 equiv.) as the electro-
phile, run either in a ChCl–Gly (1 : 2) or ChCl–urea (1 : 2) DES
Notes and references
1 J. P. Wolfe and M. B. Hay, Tetrahedron, 2007, 63, 261.
mixture, smoothly afforded the desired ortho-hydroxyalkylated
product 4o in both cases in 75% yield (Table 3, entries 2 and 3).
A decrease in selectivity, however, was observed when the
addition to benzophenone was carried out in a ChCl–H2O
2 D. Liu, C. Liu, H. Li and A. Lei, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 4453.
3 (a) A. R. Kennedy, J. Klett, R. E. Mulvey and D. S. Wright, Science,
´
´
2009, 326, 706; (b) E. Crosbie, P. Garcıa-Alvarez, A. R. Kennedy,
J. Klett, R. E. Mulvey and S. D. Robertson, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2010, 49, 9388.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 8655--8658 | 8657