28
29
30
31
32
until 1 was completely consumed (monitored by TLC analysis). After the completion of the reactions, ethanol was removed under
reduced pressure. The crude products were purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluting with petroleum ether/ethyl
acetate/ triethylamine (35:15:1, v/v/v). Further purification of the products was accomplished by recrystallization. Physical and
chemical data of chosen products are described below.
NH2
NC
CN
O
X
NC
2
O
DBU
+
Ethanol
R
CF3
R
CHO
X
CF3
1
3
4a-q
33
34
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2-amino-4H-pyran derivatives.
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
(E)-2-Amino-6-methyl-4-phenyl-8-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzylidene)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-4H-pyrano[3,2-c]pyridine-3-carbonitrile
(4a):
White solid; mp 235-238 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.26 (s, 3H), 2.75 (d, 1H, J = 16 Hz), 2.97 (d, 1H, J = 16 Hz), 3.36 (d, 1H, J =
13.8 Hz), 3.53 (d, 1H, J = 13.8 Hz), 4.03 (s, 1H), 4.68 (s, 2H), 6.90 (s, 1H), 7.24-7.39 (m, 7H), 7.61 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3): δ 41.7, 44.9, 54.6, 55.3, 60.5, 114.1, 119.7, 121.4, 122.8, 125.3, 125.4, 125.5, 127.7, 127.9, 128.9, 129.0, 129.3, 129.8, 139.8, 139.9,
142.0, 158.8. MS (ESI): m/z 424.2 [M+H]+.
(E)-2-Amino-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-8-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzylidene)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-4H-chromene-3-carbonitrile (4o): Fulvous solid;
1
mp 211-214 °C; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.65-1.66 (m, 2H), 1.88-1.92 (m, 1H), 2.04-2.08 (m, 1H), 2.54-2.58 (m, 1H), 2.69-2.73 (m,
1H), 4.14 (s, 1H), 4.69 (s, 2H), 6.93 (s, 1H), 7.39-7.63 (m, 6H), 8.11-8.17 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 22.1, 27.0, 27.5, 43.6, 59.4,
114.8, 119.3, 122.3, 122.8, 125.2, 128.7, 129.0, 129.4, 129.9, 130.8, 134.2, 140.4, 141.9, 145.0, 148.8, 159.1. MS (ESI): m/z 454.2 [M+H]+.
(E)-tert-Butyl
2-amino-3-cyano-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-8-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzylidene)-7,8-dihydro-4H-pyrano[3,2-c]pyridine-6(5H)-
carboxylate (4p): Flavescens solid; mp 210-212 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.30 (s, 9H), 3.63-4.78 (m, 7H), 6.98 (s, 1H), 7.40-7.42 (m,
2H), 7.57-7.66 (m, 4H), 8.13-8.20 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 28.1, 40.0, 41.3, 44.1, 59.5, 80.9, 111.9, 118.8, 122.7, 123.1, 125.5,
129.3, 130.1, 134.1, 148.9, 153.9, 158.9. MS (ESI): m/z 555.3 [M+H]+.
(E)-2-Amino-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-8-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzylidene)-4,5,7,8-tetrahydropyrano[4,3-b]pyran-3-carbonitrile (4q): Flavescens
solid; mp 238-240 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 3.77 (d, 1H, J = 16 Hz), 4.23 (d, 1H, J = 16 Hz), 4.44 (s, 1H), 4.54 (d, 1H, J = 13.8
Hz), 4.65 (d, 1H, J = 13.8 Hz), 7.01 (s, 1H), 7.12 (s, 2H), 7.44-7.46 (m, 2H), 7.69-7.77 (m, 4H), 8.09 (s, 1H), 8.17-8.19 (m, 1H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO): δ 55.3, 65.3, 65.5, 114.1, 120.4, 120.9, 122.5, 123.0, 123.3, 125.9, 128.8, 130.2, 131.1, 134.9, 138.9, 139.8, 145.7, 148.6,
160.5. MS (ESI): m/z 456.2 [M+H]+.
54
3. Results and discussion
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
As shown in Table 1, we began our optimization studies from the reaction between (E)-1-methyl-3-(4-
(trifluoromethyl)benzylidene)piperidin-4-one, malononitrile and benzaldehyde, in equimolecular amounts, using DBU as a base and
dichloromethane as a solvent. Under mild conditions at room temperature for 1 h, the domino reaction provided a promising 87%
isolated yield of (E)-2-amino-6-methyl-4-phenyl-8-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzylidene)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-4H-pyrano[3,2-c]pyridine-3-
carbonitrile 4a (Entry 1). This model reaction was then performed in acetonitrile and DMF, which led to poorer isolated yields 73%
and 72% of 4a, respectively (Entries 2-3). To our pleasure, the reaction in ethanol gave an isolated yield of 95% of 4a (Entry 6).
Table 1
Optimization of reaction conditions for compound 4a.
Entry
Solvent
CH2Cl2
CH3CN
DMF
Base (equiv.)
DBU (2)
DBU (2)
DBU (2)
Time (h)
Yield of 4a (%)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
4
87
73
72
74
88
95
68
75
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
DBU (1)
DBU (1.5)
DBU (2)
Triethylamine (2)
Piperidine (2)
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
a Isolated yield after purification by column chromatography.
The nature and the amount of base have significant influence on the yield (Entries 4-8). It was not advisable to reduce the amount
of DBU, which led to a decrease in yields (Entries 4-6). In addition, the efficacy of the bases assayed changed in the order:
triethylamine < piperidine < DBU (Entries 6-8). It was found that the reaction proceeded most efficiently in the presence of 2
equivalents of DBU in ethanol at room temperature for 1 hour, and the desired product was isolated in the best yield.
Under the optimized conditions, various α, β-unsaturated ketones (1) with a diverse set of aldehydes (3) were then applied to the
preparation of a library of 2-amino-4H-pyran analogues (4). In general, the reactions could proceed smoothly with 60%-96% isolated
Page 3 of 6