Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
(6) Bordwell, F. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 456−463.
from DMSO to CCl4. The relative rates of this transformation,
however, are expected to be concentration-dependent since the
reactants are polar compounds and the relative acidity of p-
nitrophenol and 2 is sensitive to the polarity of the medium.
This hypothesis was borne out in that when the concentrations
of the two reactants were tripled (entries 5 and 6), k2/
kp‑HOC H NO decreased from 29 to 17. Likewise, when the
(7) Charton, M. In Progress in Physical Organic Chemistry; Taft, R. W.,
Ed.; Interscience: New York, 1981; Vol. 13, p 119−251.
(8) Hansch, C.; Leo, A.; Taft, R. W. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165−195.
(9) Juhasz, M.; Hoffmann, S.; Stoyanov, E.; Kim, K. C.; Reed, C. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5352−5355.
(10) Abkowicz-Bienko, A. J.; Latajka, Z. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104,
1004−1008.
(11) Hussein, M. A.; Millen, D. J.; Mines, G. W. J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 2 1976, 72, 686−692.
(12) All acidities come from refs 6 and 13−17.
(13) Bordwell, F. G.; et al. University of Wisconsin Madison’s
6
4
2
original concentrations were reduced by a factor of 3 (entries 7
and 8) the ratio increased from 29 to 64. This latter difference
is even larger (i.e., 180) when the reaction is run in toluene-d8.
Additional gas-phase computations revealed that 3-hydroxy-
N-methylpyridinium ion is 22 pKa units (30 kcal mol−1) more
acidic than p-methyl(dipentyl)ammonium phenol, so the
(14) Bordwell, F. G.; McCallum, R. J.; Olmstead, W. N. J. Org. Chem.
1984, 49, 1424−1427.
octylammonium BArF − salt of 3-hydroxypyridine (i.e., 3) was
4
synthesized. Its IR spectra in CCl4 and 1% CD3CN/CCl4 have
bands at 3566 and 3196 cm−1, respectively. This red shift of
370 cm−1 indicates that 3 is more acidic than 2 in carbon
tetrachloride as predicted by the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p)
calculations. The pyridinium ion 3 was also found to be a
more active catalyst than p-nitrophenol and 2 by factors of up
to 2000 and 30, respectively (entries 7−9).
(15) Bordwell, F. G.; Cheng, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1736−
1743.
(16) Bartmess, J. E. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard
Reference Database Number 6; Mallard, W. G., Lustrum, P. J., Eds.;
National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD
(17) Angel, L. A.; Ervin, K. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 10392−
10403.
Protonated catalysts have been successfully employed in
organic transformations24,28−31 but provide an additional
hydrogen bond donor site that can be actively involved in
the reaction. Nonprotonated ions eliminate this concern and
can enhance acidities of ionizable groups in nonpolar
environments. This effect undoubtedly can be reversed to
increase the basicity of basic sites, and the exploitation of
electrostatics is an exciting avenue for further exploration.21
Studies along these lines are in progress, and even more
dramatic effects may be obtained by incorporating the
counterion into the reagent at a remote noninteracting location.
(18) One hydrogen bond criterion typically observed is a red shift in
the IR Arunan, E.; et al. Pure Appl. Chem. 2011, 83, 1637−1641.
(19) Similar results are observed in CDCl3 and 1% CD3CN/99%
CDCl3 (i.e., p-XC6H4OH, X = H (3598 and 184 cm−1), Br (3596 and
188 cm−1), CN (3582 and 227 cm−1), NO2 (3580 and 240 cm−1), and
2 (3555 and 320 cm−1) where the values in parentheses are ν and Δν,
respectively.
(20) Separate plots for the meta and para derivatives do not lead to
improved data fits.
(21) Patrick, J. S.; Yang, S. S.; Cooks, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 231−232.
(22) Strittmatter, E. F.; Wong, R. L.; Williams, E. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 1247−1248.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
(23) For related studies employing protonated catalysts, charged
metal-templated hydrogen bond donors, and pyridinium cations as
anion-binding catalysts, see refs 24−26, respectively.
(24) Ganesh, M.; Seidel, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16464−
16465.
■
S
Experimental and computational sections including synthetic
procedures, NMR spectra, and calculated structures and
energies along with the complete citation to ref 18 are
provided. This material is available free of charge via the
(25) (a) Scherer, A.; Mukherjee, T.; Hampel, F.; Gladysz, J. A.
Organometallics 2014, 33, 6709−6722. (b) Mukherjee, T.; Ganzmann,
C.; Bhuvanesh, N.; Gladysz, J. A. Organometallics 2014, 33, 6723−
6737.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
(26) Berkessel, A.; Das, S.; Pekel, D.; Neudorfl, J.-M. Angew. Chem.,
̈
■
Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11660−11664.
(27) Shokri, A.; Wang, X. B.; Kass, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135,
9525−9530.
Present Address
(28) Huang, J.; Corey, E. J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 5027−5029.
(29) Bolm, C.; Rantanen, T.; Schiffers, I.; Zani, L. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 1758−1763.
†Ripon College, Ripon, Wisconsin 54971, United States.
Notes
(30) Takenaka, N.; Sarangthem, R. S.; Seerla, S. K. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
2819−2822.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
(31) Auvil, T. J.; Schafer, A. G.; Mattson, A. E. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2014, 2633−2646.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
Generous support from the National Science Foundation and
the Minnesota Supercomputer Institute for Advanced Compu-
tational Research are gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Reed, C. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 133−139.
(2) Akiyama, T. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5744−5758.
(3) Yamamoto, H.; Boxer, M. B. Chimia 2007, 61, 279−281.
(4) Tian, Z.; Fattahi, A.; Lis, L.; Kass, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 16984−16988.
(5) Parmar, D.; Sugiono, E.; Raja, S.; Rueping, M. Chem. Rev. 2014,
114, 9047−9153.
C
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX