Communication
ine intermediate 3 with an electrophilic fluorine reagent and
the selectivity of the elimination of nitrous acid or hydrogen
fluoride are key considerations.
agent, a sequential transformation of 1a to 2a was conducted,
as depicted in Table 2. A high conversion of 96% was obtained
in CH3CN, but other solvents diminished the first 1,4-reduction
step and reduced the fluorination and elimination rate drasti-
cally (Table 2, entries 1–5). Strong acids such as l-CSA or p-
TsOH·H2O could replace 1,1’-binaphthyl-2,2’-diylhydrogenphos-
phate (BPA) perfectly (Table 2, entries 8–9), while weaker acids
such as o-nitrobenzoic acid or acetic acid failed (Table 2, en-
tries 6–7). Therefore, p-TsOH·H2O was chosen as the alternative
hydrogenation catalyst in consideration of its cost and availa-
bility. The optimized conditions for this mild and metal-free flu-
orination reaction were finally established as: HEH (1.1 equiv),
p-TsOH·H2O (5 mol%); Selectfluor (1.3 equiv); KOtBu (2.0 equiv),
CH3CN.
Following above hypothesis, the important step is how to
trap the 1,4-reduction intermediate 3 by electrophilic fluorina-
tion. An original survey on common fluorine sources showed
that both Selectfluor and N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide (NFSI)
performed well in trapping the in situ generated 3-nitro-2-
phenyl-1,4-dihydroquinoline (3a) in CH3CN. In addition, the
electrophilic attack by Selectfluor quantitatively converted 3a
to 3-fluoro-3-nitro-2-phenyl-3,4-dihydro-quinoline (4a) within
5 min.[13] With isolated 4a in hand, further research focused on
screening the conditions for the selective elimination of nitrous
acid.[14] Preliminary trials revealed that a base could accelerate
the eliminative rearomatization of 4a, while acids, oxidants, or
heating could not (Table 1, entries 1–3); a promising result (full
conversion, 86% selectivity to 2a) was obtained in the pres-
ence of Et3N (Table 1, entry 4). Further evaluation of different
bases illustrated that complete rearomatization could be ach-
ieved by a series of common bases, with inorganic bases per-
forming better than organic bases in terms of selectivity and
yield, and the best result was obtained with KOtBu (Table 1,
entries 6–9,). Notably, no deterioration of conversion or selec-
tivity was observed when half amount of the base was used
(Table 1, entry 10). With KOtBu (2.0 equiv) as the optimized
base, increasing or lowering the temperature only had a mar-
ginal influence on the selectivity and conversion (Table 1, en-
tries 11–12).
With this newly developed triple-relay transformation strat-
egy in hand, we next set out to demonstrate the generality
and practicality in detail with various 3-nitroquinolines, and
the results are summarized in Table 3. The reaction could be
carried out with a series of substituted 3-nitroquinolines, af-
fording the corresponding products in moderate to good
yields. Both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing
groups at the C2-position were tolerated under the reaction
conditions and there was also no significant influence of the
position of the 2-aryl substituents. Besides, the yield decreases
with aryl>alkenylꢀalkynyl>alkyl substituents at the C2-posi-
tion. Notably, in terms of reactivity, the dearomatization pro-
After screening bases for the selective elimination, a >99:1
ratio of 2a/1a was achieved (entry 10, Table 1). Therefore, we
envisaged a one-pot transformation of 3-nitroquinolines to 3-
fluoroquinolines. With diethyl-2,6-dimethyl-1,4-dihydropyridine-
3,5-dicarboxylate (HEH) as the hydrogen source for the initial
partial reduction process and Selectfluor as the fluorinating re-
Table 2. Optimization of reaction parameters for the one-pot transforma-
tion.[a]
Table 1. Screening of conditions for the selective elimination of nitrous
acid.[a]
Entry
Conditions
Conversion [%][b]
Ratio of 2a/1a[b]
Entry
Solvents
Acid
Conversion [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Heat (508C)
<5
<5
<5
–
–
–
DDQ (1.1 equiv)
p-TsOH·H2O (1.1 equiv)
Et3N (4.0 equiv)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CH3CN
THF
1,4-dioxane
toluene
Et2O
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
BPA
BPA
BPA
BPA
96
76
57
58
44
<5
<5
94
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
>95
86:14
82:18
93:7
93:7
93:7
>99:1
>99:1
99:1
>99:1
DABCO (4.0 equiv)
Na2CO3 (2.0 equiv)
K2CO3 (2.0 equiv)
Cs2CO3 (2.0 equiv)
KOtBu (4.0 equiv)
KOtBu (2.0 equiv)
KOtBu (2.0 equiv)
KOtBu (2.0 equiv)
BPA
AcOH
o-nitrobenzoic acid
l-CSA
p-TsOH·H2O
10
11[c]
12[d]
97
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.20 mmol), HEH (1.1 equiv), and acid
(5 mol%) in solvent (3.0 mL) were stirred for 10 h at RT; then Selectfluor
(1.3 equiv) was added and after about 20 h KOtBu (2.0 equiv) was added
[a] Reaction condition: 4a (0.20 mmol), CH3CN (3.0 mL), RT, 12 h. [b] De-
termined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. [c] At 08C. [d] At 508C. DDQ=2,3-di-
1
and the mixture was stirred for 5.5 h. [b] Determined by H NMR spectros-
chloro-5,6-dicyano-p-benzoquinone;
octane.
DABCO=1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]
copy. l-CSA=(L)-camphorsulfonic acid; p-TsOH·H2O=p-toluenesulfonic
acid monohydrate; BPA=1,1’-binaph-thyl-2,2’-diyl hydrogenphosphate.
&
&
Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 1 – 5
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!