FULL PAPERS
Intermolecular [3+2]Annulation of Cyclopropylanilines
eral Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health
(NIH) (Grant Number P30 GM103450), NSF Career Award
under Award Number CHE-1255539. We thank Jiang Wang,
Soumitra Maity, and Mingzhao Zhu for early experimental
assistance of this work as well as Derrel Walters and Profes-
sor Peter Pulay for the DFT calculations.
derivatives. Most of these amines possess embedded
functional groups that allow for further structural di-
versification. We anticipate that this method will find
usage particularly in diversity-oriented synthesis
(DOS).
Experimental Section
References
General Procedure for the [3+2] Annulation of
Cyclopropylanilines with Alkyne, Enyne, and Diyne
[1] Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, 2ednnd ednVol. 5,
(Eds.: P. Knochel, G. A. Molander), Elsevier, Amster-
dam, 2014.
An oven-dried test tube (16ꢂ125 mm) equipped with a stir
bar was charged with catalyst (2 mol%), cyclopropylaniline
(0.2 mmol), alkyne, enyne, or diyne (1.0 mmol), and dry sol-
vent (2 mL). The test tube was sealed with a Teflon screw
cap. The reaction mixture was degassed by freeze-pump-
thaw cycles and then irradiated at room temperature with
one white LED (18 W) positioned 8 cm from the test tube.
After the reaction was complete as monitored by TLC, the
mixture was diluted with diethyl ether and filtered through
a short pad of silica gel. The filtrate was concentrated under
vacuum and purified by silica gel flash chromatography to
afford the desired product.
[2] For selected recent reviews: a) G. Muncipinto, in: Di-
versity-Oriented Synthesis: Basics and Applications in
Organic Synthesis Drug Discovery, and Chemical Biol-
ogy, (Ed.: A. Trabocchi), John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken,
2013, p 59–95; b) C. J. OꢁConnor, H. S. G. Beckmann,
D. R. Spring, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4444–4456.
[3] For selected recent reviews: a) J. J. Douglas, J. D.
Nguyen, K. P. Cole, C. R. J. Stephenson, Aldrichimica
Acta 2014, 47, 15–25; b) T. P. Yoon, ACS Catal. 2013, 3,
895–902; c) C. K. Prier, D. A. Rankic, D. W. C. MacMil-
lan, Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 5322–5363; d) J. Xuan, L.-Q.
Lu, J.-R. Chen, W.-J. Xiao, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013,
6755–6770.
Procedure for the Deprotection of the PMP Group
To
a
pre-cooled solution of para-methoxyphenylamine
[4] a) K. Kalyanasundaram, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1982, 46,
1159–1244; b) L. Flamigni, A. Barbieri, C. Sabatini, B.
Ventura, F. Barigelletti, Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 281,
143–203.
[5] a) S. Maity, M. Zhu, R. S. Shinabery, N. Zheng, Angew.
Chem. 2012, 124, 226–230; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012,
51, 222–226; b) T. H. Nguyen, S. Maity, N. Zheng, Beil-
stein J. Org. Chem. Beilstein. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10,
975–980.
[6] J. D. Nguyen, B. Reiss, C. Dai, C. R. J. Stephenson,
Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 4352–4354.
[7] M. S. Lowry, S. Bernhard, Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 7970–
7977.
(51 mg, 0.2 mmol) in 3:1 CH3CN:H2O (2 mL) was slowly
added concentrated H2SO4 (22 mL, 0.385 mmol) at 08C.
Ceric ammonium nitrate (220 mg, 0.4 mmol) was then added
in one portion, and the mixture was stirred for one hour at
08C. The resulting mixture was then diluted with water
(2 mL) and separated. The aqueous phase was then washed
with Et2O (3ꢂ5 mL). The combined organic phase was then
extracted with 0.1N HCl (1ꢂ15 mL), and the obtained
aqueous phase was added to the previous aqueous mixture,
which was immediately basified to pH 14 using 5N KOH.
The basic aqueous layer was then extracted with Et2O (2ꢂ
30 mL). The combined organic layer was then acidified to
pH 1 using hydrogen chloride (2M in Et2O). The resulting
solution was then dried over MgSO4 and concentrated to
give the HCl salt as a dark brown oil. The crude HCl salt
was used in the next step without further purification.
[8] M. Charpenay, A. Boudhar, C. Hulot, G. Blond, J. Suf-
fert, Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 7568–7591.
[9] H. Zhou, C. Moberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134,
15992–15999.
To a solution of the HCl salt (35 mg, 0.18 mmol) in dry
CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added Et3N (56 mL, 0.4 mmol) dropwise
at room temperature. Acetyl chloride (16 mL, 0.22 mmol)
was slowly added and the reaction mixture was stirred for
6 h at room temperature. The reaction was quenched with
water (10 mL) and the layers were separated. The aqueous
phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3ꢂ10 mL). The combined
organic layers were dried over MgSO4 and concentrated to
give the crude product. Purification using silica gel chroma-
tography (1:1 hexanes:EtOAc) provided the desired acylat-
ed product; yield; 26.5 mg (68% over 2 steps).
[10] X. Li, M. L. Grimm, K. Igarashi, N. Castagnoli Jr, J. M.
Tanko, Chem. Commun. 2007, 2648–2650.
[11] a) L. Ackermann, A. V. Lygin, Org. Lett. 2011, 13,
3332–3335; b) L. Ackermann, A. V. Lygin, Org. Lett.
2012, 14, 764–767.
[12] a) C. K. Jana, S. Grimme, A. Studer, Chem. Eur. J.
2009, 15, 9078–9084; b) N. Dastbaravardeh, M.
Schnꢃrch, M. D. Mihovilovic, Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1930–
1933; c) Z. Wang, B. J. Reinus, G. Dong, Chem.
Commun. 2014, 50, 5230–5232.
[13] a) J. M. M. Verkade, L. J. C. van Hemert, P. J. L. M.
Quaedflieg, P. L. Alsters, F. L. van Delft, F. P. J. T.
Rutjes, Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 8109–8113; b) S. De
Lamo Marin, T. Martens, C. Mioskowski, J. Royer, J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10592–10595.
[14] G. Bergonzini, C. S. Schindler, C.-J. Wallentin, E. N. Ja-
cobsen, C. R. J. Stephenson, Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 112–
116.
Acknowledgements
This publication was supported by the University of Arkan-
sas, Arkansas Bioscience Institute, National Institute of Gen-
Adv. Synth. Catal. 0000, 000, 0 – 0
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
7
ÞÞ
These are not the final page numbers!