electrospray mode. The potential on the electrospray capillary
was set to 2.0 kV and the extraction cone voltage was set to
a value of 25 V, wit◦h the extractor at 4.0 V and a desolvation
temperature of 150 C. Samples were dissolved in methanol at
1 mg ml−1. Aliquots of 10 lL were injected into a flowing solvent
mixture (1 ml min−1) composed of 10% aqueous ammonium
acetate solution (10 mM) and 90% methanol by volume. A flow
rate of 0.2 ml min−1 of this mixture was diverted into the mass
spectrometer.
(CH3)C(OO)OCH2], 1.47 [3H, s, ((CH3)3CCH2)(CH3)C(OO)-
OCH2]], 1.01 [9H, s, (CH3)3CC−].
Ozonolysis of 3 in pentane at −60 ◦C (reaction B):
1
ozonates mainly in the form of ozonide and ketone, H NMR
(250 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ◦C, TMS) d 5.12 and 5.03 [2H, d,
(CH3CH2CH2)(CH3)C(OO)OCH2], 2.40 [2H, t, (CH3CH2CH2)-
(CH3)CO], 2.20 [3H, s, (CH3CH2CH2)(CH3)CO], 1.80 [2H, br,
(CH3CH2CH2)(CH3)C(OO)OCH2], 1.40 [2H + 3H, br, (CH3-
CH2CH2)(CH3)C(OO)OCH2], 0.90 [3H, t, (CH3CH2CH2−].
The other ozonolysis reactions C–F in pentane at −60 ◦C
produced mainly oligomeric ozonates, the 1H NMR (250 MHz,
CDCl3) spectra of which are discussed elsewhere in the paper.
Ozonolysis procedure
A flask containing a s◦olution of alkene was placed in a dry ice–
acetone bath at −60 C for 20 min before starting ozonolysis.
Ozone was generated by passing an oxygen stream through an
electrical discharge-type ozone generator. The O2 stream was set
to 20 ml min−1 and the electrical discharge was set at 150 V. The
O3 flow rate at these settings was measured by bubbling the
O2–O3 mixture through an alkaline boric acid-buffered aqueous
solution (50 ml) of potassium iodide (3.47 × 10−2 M) for 2 min.
The liberated iodine solution was then acidified before being
titrated with sodium thiosulfate (6.94 × 10−2 M) using starch
indicator solution. The rate of evolution of O3 was found to be
0.88 g hr−1.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from ICI Paints
(SRF award, R3AB2352) and thank Dr P. Palasz and Dr
S. Emmett for their continued interest in the project. We also
thank Mr J. McAuley (Queen’s University, Belfast) and Prof.
B. Mann (University of Sheffield) for helpful discussions.
References
1 J. E. Lockley, J. R. Ebdon, S. Rimmer and B. J. Tabner, Macromol.
Rapid Commun., 2000, 21, 841–845.
The O2–O3 mixture was bubbled through the stirred solution,
with the outlet gas from this being passed directly into an ozone
analyser (BMT Ozone Analyser 963, Berlin). Initially, almost all
the O3 in the gas was taken up by the solution, but eventually, as
ozonolysis reaches completion, the increasingly positive reading
on the analyser stabilised at about 40 g m−3. The completion of
alkene ozonolysis can also be observed visually, as the solution
turns blue from saturation with O3. Typically the time required
for ozonolysis was proportional to the concentration of alkene
in the solution. For example, the ozonolysis reactions of 2,4,4-
trimethylpent-1-ene and 3-methylpent-2-ene in pentane, A and
C, were completed in 80 and 50 min respectively. This amounts
to the respective solutions receiving 1.17 g (24.4 mM) and 0.73 g
(15.3 mM) of O3, which are approximately equivalent to the
alkene concentrations in each of the solutions. After completion
of ozonolysis, the contents of the flask were bubbled through
with N2 for about 20 min to remove free O3. The solvent
was then carefully removed under reduced pressure at room
temperature in a rotary evaporator, and the yield of product
recorded. The samples were then stored in a refrigerator at
−10 ◦C with all subsequent analyses being completed within
a few days. No safety problems were encountered during the
ozonolysis reactions but we would advise appropriate caution in
the preparation and handling of the ozonates, e.g. use of safety
shields, given the potentially explosive nature of many of the
products. The ozonates were always maintained and handled in
solution by us and were never rigorously dried.
2 J. E. Lockley, J. R. Ebdon and S. Rimmer, J. Chem. Res., 2001,
380–383.
3 D. Cunliffe, J. E. Lockley, J. R. Ebdon, S. Rimmer, P. Palasz and S.
Emmett, Polymer, 2001, 42, 9329–9333.
4 D. Cunliffe, J. Lockley, J. R. Ebdon, S. Rimmer and B. J. Tabner,
Des. Monomers Polym., 2002, 5, 233–243.
5 J. E. Lockley, J. R. Ebdon, S. Rimmer and B. J. Tabner, Polymer,
2001, 42, 1797–1807.
6 M. Barton, J. R. Ebdon, A. B. Foster and S. Rimmer, J. Org. Chem.,
2004, 69, 6967–6973.
7 P. S. Bailey, Ozonation in Organic Chemistry, Vol. 1: Olefinic
Compounds, Academic Press, New York, 1978.
8 (a) R. Criegee, Angew. Chem., 1975, 87, 765–771; (b) R. Criegee,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1975, 14, 745.
9 W. H. Bunnelle, Chem. Rev., 1991, 91, 335–362.
10 A. Rieche, R. Meister and H. Sauthoff, Ann., 1942, 553, 187.
11 (a) R. Criegee and G. Lohaus, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1953, 583,
1; (b) R. Criegee, Rec. Chem. Prog., 1957, 18, 111.
12 F. L. Greenwood and H. Rubinstein, J. Org. Chem., 1967, 32, 3369–
3374.
13 (a) S. D. Razumovskii, L. V. Berezova, N. D. Gil’chenok, O. M.
Oranskaya, Y. N. Yur’ev and V. K. Tsyskovskii, J. Gen. Chem.
USSR (Eng. Transl.), 1966, 2, 1910; (b) S. D. Razumovskii, G. A.
Niazashvili, I. A. Tutorskii and Y. N. Yur’ev, Polym. Sci. USSR (Eng.
Transl.), 1971, 13, 217.
14 (a) S. Fliszar, D. Gravel and E. Cavalieri, Can. J. Chem., 1966, 44,
67–73; (b) S. Fliszar, D. Gravel and E. Cavalieri, Can. J. Chem., 1966,
44, 1013–1019; (c) S. Fliszar, Can. J. Chem., 1966, 44, 2351–2354;
(d) S. Fliszar and J. B. Chylinska, Can. J. Chem., 1967, 45, 29–31;
(e) S. Fliszar and J. B. Chylinska, Can. J. Chem., 1968, 46, 783–788.
15 N. A. Milas and I. Belic, Vestn. Slov. Kem. Drus., 1963, 10, 37–48.
16 R. W. Murray and V. Ramachandran, J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 813–
816.
Preliminary analysis of the ozonates
Ozonolysis of 2 in pentane at −60 ◦C (reaction A): ozonates
mainly in the form of ozonide and ketone, 1H NMR (250 MHz,
CDCl3, 25 ◦C, TMS) d 5.14 and 5.04 [2H, d, ((CH3)3CCH2)-
(CH3)C(OO)OCH2], 2.31 [2H, s, ((CH3)3CCH2)(CH3)CO], 2.12
[3H, s, ((CH3)3CCH2)(CH3)CO], 1.75 [2H, s, ((CH3)3CCH2)-
17 R. W. Murray and J. S. Su, J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 817–822.
18 R. W. Murray and S. K. Agarwal, J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50, 4698–4702.
19 K. J. McCullough, Contemp. Org. Synth., 1995, 2, 225–249.
20 K. J. McCullough and M. Nojima, Curr. Org. Chem., 2001, 5, 601–
635.
21 L. F. R. Cafferata, Trends Org. Chem., 1993, 4, 773–791.
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 5 , 3 , 1 3 2 3 – 1 3 2 9
1 3 2 9