Nickel(II) and Zinc(II) meso-Tetracyclohexylporphyrins
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 38, No. 8, 1999 1773
hexane/dichloromethane mixtures of increasing polarities (90/10, 85/
15, and finally 65/35). The various pure fractions were combined, and
the free base porphyrin was recrystallized from a dichloromethane-
acetonitrile mixture. Yield: 1.49 g of tetracyclohexylporphyrin, 1,
(23%): MS-FAB+ m/z 639, MH+; UV-vis (CH2Cl2) λmax/nm 422,
1
525, 562, 603, 660; H NMR, 200 MHz, CDCl3, 20 °C, δ -1.60 (s,
2H, N-H), 1.83 (m, 12H, H4a, H3a), 2.14 (m, 12H, H4e, H3e), 2.58 (m,
8H, H2e), 2.96 (m, 8H, H2a), 4.76 (tt, 4H, H1, J 12.5 Hz, J′ 3.5 Hz),
9.46 (s, 8H, Hâ); 13C NMR, 75 MHz, CDCl3, 20 °C, δ 26.7 (C4), 28.5
(C3), 38.7 (C2), 46.9 (C1), 122.5 (Cmeso), 129.1(Câ), 143.7 (CR).
Ni(TCHP). A 100 mg amount of 1 (0.16 mmol) and 390 mg of
nickel acetate (1.6 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of a 1/1 chloroform/
ethanol mixture. The resulting solution was brought to reflux for 1 h,
and then evaporated to dryness. The solid product was purified by
column chromatography on silica gel (50 g) using a 1/1 dichlo-
romethane/cyclohexane mixture as eluent, and recrystallized from
chloroform-acetonitrile. Yield: 100 mg of nickel(II) tetracyclohexyl-
Figure 1. A schematic view of the (-g,g,-g,g) conformer of a M(II)-
tetracyclohexylporphyrin complex. One cyclohexyl group has been
artificially enlarged for better visibility of the stereochemistry and of
the atom labels.
porphyrin, 2, (90%): MS-FAB+ m/z 694, M+; UV-vis (CH2Cl2):
1
λ
max/nm 425, 508, 550, 586; H NMR, 200 MHz, CDCl3, 20 °C, δ:
1.70 (m, 12H, H4a, H3a), 2.09 (m, 12H, H4e, H3e), 2.42 (m, 8H, H2e),
2.73 (m, 8H, H2a), 4.21 (tt, 4H, H1, J 12.5 Hz, J′ 3.4 Hz), 9.21 (s, 8H,
Hâ); 13C NMR, 75 MHz, CDCl3, 20 °C, δ: 26.6 (C4), 28.2 (C3), 38.1
(C2), 45.6 (C1), 121.2 (Cmeso), 130.6 (Câ), 139.1 (CR).
ylsilane. Cyclic voltammetry was carried out with an EG&G Model
173 potentiostat or an IBM Model EC 225 Voltammetric Analyzer.
Current-voltage curves were recorded on an EG&G Princeton Applied
Research Model RE-0151 X-Y recorder. A three-electrode system was
used and consisted of a glassy carbon or platinum button working
electrode, a platinum wire counter electrode, and a saturated calomel
reference electrode (SCE). This reference electrode was separated from
the bulk of the solution by a fritted-glass bridge filled with the solvent/
supporting electrolyte mixture. Ferrocene was used as an internal
standard, but all potentials are referenced to the SCE. UV-visible
spectroelectrochemical experiments were performed with a home-built
platinum thin-layer electrode of the type described in the literature.10
Potentials were applied and monitored with an EG&G Model 173
potentiostat. Time-resolved UV-visible spectra were recorded with a
Princeton Instrument PDA-1024 diode array and ST 1000 detector
controller. Data acquisition and processing were performed using
OSMA and PSMA software.
Zn(TCHP). This complex was prepared from 1 and zinc acetate by
a procedure entirely similar to that used for Ni(TCHP). Yield: 95 mg
(85%) of zinc(II) tetracyclohexylporphyrin, 3, after recrystallization
from chloroform-pentane: MS-FAB+ m/z 700, M+; UV-vis (CH2-
1
Cl2) λmax/nm 423, 524, 562, 624; H NMR, 200 MHz, CDCl3, 20 °C,
δ 1.90 (m, 12H, H4a, H3a), 2.17 (m, 12H, H4e, H3e), 2.62 (m, 8H, H2e),
3.10 (m, 8H, H2a), 5.06 (tt, 4H, H1, J 12.5 Hz, J′ 3.5 Hz), 9.75 (s, 8H,
Hâ); 13C NMR, 75 MHz, CDCl3, 20 °C, δ 26.8 (C4), 28.7 (C3), 38.8
(C2), 47.2 (C1), 124.1 (Cmeso), 129.6 (Câ), 143.7 (CR).
X-ray Structure Determinations of Ni(TCHP) and Zn(TCHP).
Red, single crystals suitable for X-ray structure determinations were
obtained by recrystallization from chloroform-acetonitrile. Unit cell
parameter determination with an area detector have been described
earlier.5 Data collection was processed with an Enraf-Nonius FAST
area detector diffractometer with a FR-588 low-temperature device and
graphite-monochromated Mo KR radiation. For 2, a total of 9857
collected reflections were considered as observed (Fo g 1.9σ(Fo)), of
which 3726 were unique; for 3: 7701 and 2799 (Fo g 1.7σ(Fo)),
respectively. Intensities of all reflections were reduced using Lorentz
and polarization corrections. Both structures were solved by Patterson
methods from the SHELXS86 program.6 For 2, the position of Ni was
used in the DIRDIF program that enabled us to find all atoms. For 3,
positions of all atoms were revealed. For all nonhydrogen atoms,
anisotropic least-squares refinement was used. Hydrogen atoms were
included as fixed, idealized contributions. The refinement converged
to a value of R ) 0.092, wR ) 0.103 and R ) 0.072, wR ) 0.087 for
2 and 3, respectively. The maximum electron density on a final
difference Fourier map was 1.02 e/Å3 (in a distance 2.30 Å from C(3))
and the minimum was -0.65 e/Å3 for 2 and 1.05 e/Å3 (1.35 Å from
N(2)) and -0.80 e/Å3 for 3, respectively. Other programs used in this
study included local modifications of Beurskens, Bosman, Doesburg,
Gould, van den Hark, Prick, Noordik, Parthasarathi, Bruins, Slot,
Haltiwanger, Strumpel, and Smits’s DIRDIF, Busing and Levy’s
ORFFE and ORFLS, Jacobson’s ALLS, Zalkin’s FORDAP, and
Johnson’s ORTEP2. Atomic form factors were from Cromer and Mann.7
Real and imaginary corrections for anomalous dispersion in the form
factor of the Ni and Zn atoms were from Cromer and Liberman.8
Scattering factors for hydrogen were from Stewart et al.9
Results
Synthesis and Spectral Characterization. We find that 1
can be obtained in 23% yield by conventional Lindsey con-
densation11 of pyrrole and cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde in
dichloromethane containing 0.1% ethanol, using trifluoroacetic
acid as the catalyst. As explained below for 2 and 3, the highly
1
symmetric H and 13C NMR spectra of 1 are consistent with
fast averaging of equatorially bound cyclohexyl groups in a chair
conformation shown schematically in Figure 1.
X-ray Structures. A summary of crystallographic data is
shown in Table 1. The structures of 2 and 3, which are shown,
respectively, in Figures 2 and 3, confirm the equatorial bonding
of the meso-cyclohexyl groups, consistent with the greater
stability of equatorially substituted cyclohexane isomers.12
Conformations in which the mean plane of the cyclohexyl
groups would be coplanar with that of the porphyrin obviously
are restricted by steric crowding between H2e and Hâ. In the
observed geometry, these planes are approximately orthogonal,
resulting in gauche conformations ((g, see below) of the CR-
Cmeso-C1-C2 fragments. Bumping interactions between hy-
drogen atoms in axial position on C1 and on the neighboring
â-pyrrolic position are effectively relieved by minute rotations
of the cyclohexyl groups off the strictly orthogonal orientation.
A relative g or -g conformation can be defined for each of the
four cyclohexyl substituents,13 depending on the clockwise or
Instrumentation. UV-vis spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer
1
Lambda 9. H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 200 or 300
MHz NMR spectrometer. Chemical shifts are referenced to tetrameth-
(5) Scheidt, W. R.; Turowska-Tyrk, I. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 1314.
(6) Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1990, 46, 467.
(7) Cromer, D. T.; Mann, J. B. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1968, 24, 321.
(8) Cromer, D. T.; Liberman, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 53, 1891.
(9) Stewart, R. F.; Davidson, E. R.; Simpson, W. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1965,
42, 3175.
(10) Lin, X. Q.; Kadish, K. M. Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 1498.
(11) Lindsey, J. S.; Wagner, R. W. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 828.
(12) Eliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H.; Mander, L. N. Stereochemistry of Organic
Compounds; Wiley: New York, 1994; Chapter 11, p 694.