2236 Organometallics, Vol. 15, No. 9, 1996
Yang et al.
gradually. The reaction was found to be essentially complete
after 1 h by IR and TLC analysis, at which time the solvent
was removed under vacuum at 0 °C, followed by chromato-
graphic purification over silica gel at -78 °C. The unreacted
[Co2(CO)6]2(PhC4Ph) was first removed by elution with petro-
leum ether, with the desired compound [Co2(CO)4(bma)(PhC4-
Ph)Co2(CO)6] (2) being isolated as a black solid using a mixture
of CH2Cl2/petroleum ether (3:1) as the eluant. Yield: 0.17 g
(42%).
employed a platinum disk as the working and auxiliary
electrode. The reference electrode employed in all experiments
consisted of a silver-wire quasi-reference electrode, with all
potential data reported relative to the formal potential of the
Cp2Fe/Cp2Fe+ or Cp*2Fe/Cp*2Fe+ (internally added) redox
couples, taken to have E1/2 ) 0.307 V27a and E1/2 ) -0.20 V,42
respectively.
Kin etic Mea su r em en ts. All kinetic studies were con-
ducted in Schlenk vessels under argon and under red light
conditions. Each reaction was monitored spectrophotometri-
cally by using a Hewlett-Packard 8452A UV-vis spectrometer
equipped with a variable-temperature cell. The progress of
the reaction was followed by observing the absorbances
changes in the 326 nm band of 4 for at least 4 half-lives. A
VWR refrigerated constant temperature circulator was used
to maintain the temperature, to within (0.2 °C. Plots of ln-
(A∞ - At) vs time were found to be linear, and the slopes of
these plots gave the first-order rate constants (kobsd) displayed
in Table 2, with the activation parameters determined by using
the Eyring equation.43
(b) Th er m olysis Rea ction . To a Schlenk tube containing
0.30 g (0.39 mmol) of [Co2(CO)6]2(PhC4Ph) and 0.18 g (0.39
mmol) of bma was added 30 mL of CH2Cl2 via syringe. The
solution was heated to reflux and cooled after 3 h, due to the
substantial decomposition of 2 that was observed by IR and
TLC analysis. The solvent was next removed, and [Co2-
(CO)4(bma)(PhC4Ph)Co2(CO)6] (2) was isolated by chromatog-
raphy exactly as described above. Yield: 0.13 g (35%). The
thermal sensitivity of [Co2(CO)4(bma)(PhC4Ph)Co2(CO)6] pre-
cluded an accurate combustion analysis.
Syn th esis of Com p ou n d s 3-5. To 0.30 g (0.39 mmol) of
[Co2(CO)6]2(PhC4Ph) and 0.55 g (1.18 mmol) of bma in a
Schlenk vessel was added 35 mL of 1,2-C2H4Cl2, followed by
heating at 83 °C for 1.5 h. The reaction solution was then
cooled, and the solvent was removed under vacuum. Column
chromatography over silica gel using an initial solvent system
composed of CH2Cl2/petroleum ether (1:1) afforded 35.0 mg
(yield 10%) of green Co2(CO)4[µ-η2:η2:η1:η1-(Z)-Ph2P(Ph)CdC-
MO Ca lcu la tion s. The extended Hu¨ckel calculations on
the model compounds Co2(CO)4[µ-η2:η2:η1:η1-(Z)-H2P(H)CdC-
(HC2)CdC(H2P)C(O)OC(O)], Co2(CO)2(H4-bma)2, and Co2(CO)2-
(H4-bma)[µ-CdC(H2P)C(O)OC(O)](µ2-H2P) were carried out
with the original program developed by Hoffmann,44 as modi-
fied by Mealli and Proserpio,30 with weighted Hij’s.45 The input
(PhC2)CdC(Ph2P)C(O)OC(O)] (3), 25.0 mg (yield 7%) of orange
Co2(CO)2(bma)2 (4) when a solvent mixture of CH2Cl2 and
petroleum ether (4:1) was employed, and 35.0 mg (yield 8%)
Z matrix for Co2(CO)4[µ-η2:η2:η1:η1-(Z)-H2P(H)CdC(HC2)CdC-
(H2P)C(O)OC(O)] was constructed by using the X-ray data of
3, followed by the replacement of all phenyl groups by
hydrogen atoms using the PC modeling program MOBY. A
C(sp2)-H distance of 1.07 Å and a C(sp)-H distance of 1.05 Å
were used in the calculations with Co2(CO)4[µ-η2:η2:η1:η1-(Z)-
of brown Co2(CO)2(bma)[µ-CdC(Ph2P)C(O)OC(O)](µ2-Ph2P) (5)
when CH2Cl2 was used as the eluant. Single crystals suitable
for X-ray diffraction analysis and samples for combustion
analysis of 3-5 were grown from the slow evaporation of CH2-
Cl2 from samples of 3-5 that had been dissolved in a 4:1
mixture of CH2Cl2/hexane. The isolated crystals used for
combustion analysis were dried under vacuum for 1 week.
Anal. Calcd (found) for Co2(CO)4[µ-η2:η2:η1:η1-(Z)-Ph2P(Ph)CdC-
H2P(H)CdC(HC2)CdC(H2P)C(O)OC(O)]. The input Z matrices
for Co2(CO)2(H4-bma)2 and Co2(CO)2(H4-bma)[µ-CdC(H2P)C-
(O)OC(O)](µ2-H2P) were constructed by using bma ligands
(intact) that were symmetrically bound about a linear Co2-
(CO)2. All PsH bonds were set to a distance of 1.42 Å,46 while
the remaining distances and angles were taken from the X-ray
data for 3-5.
(PhC2)CdC(Ph2P)C(O)OC(O)], C48H30Co2O7P2: C, 64.16 (63.92);
H, 3.37 (3.50). Anal. Calcd (found) for Co2(CO)2(bma)2‚CH2-
Cl2, C59H42Cl2Co2O8P4: C, 59.41 (59.60); H, 3.52 (3.66). Anal.
Calcd (found) for Co2(CO)2(bma)[µ-CdC(Ph2P)C(O)OC(O)](µ2-
Ph2P), C58H40Co2O8P4: C, 62.95 (62.44); H, 3.64 (3.73).
Ack n ow led gm en t. We thank Prof. Carlo Mealli for
providing us with a copy of his CACAO drawing
program. Financial support from the Robert A. Welch
Foundation (Grant Nos. B-1202-SGB and B-1039-MGR)
and the UNT Faculty Research Program is appreciated.
X-r a y Cr ysta llogr a p h y. All data were collected on an
Enraf-Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer using the ω-scan tech-
nique, Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.710 73 Å), and a graphite
monochromator. The data collection procedures utilized have
been described.38 Pertinent details are given in Table 3. All
data were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects, in
addition to absorption (DIFABS).39 The structures for com-
pounds 3-5 were solved by direct methods using SHELXS-
86, and each model was refined by using full-matrix least-
squares techniques. The treatment of the thermal parameters
was based on the number of observed data, with anisotropic
parameters incorporated for 3 (the Co and P atoms and all
non-phenyl carbons except for C16), 4 (all Co, P, and O atoms),
and 5 (all Co and P atoms). Hydrogen atoms were located in
difference maps, followed by inclusion in the model in idealized
positions (U(H) ) 1.3Beq(C)). All computations other than
those specified were performed by using MolEN,40 and scat-
tering factors were taken from the usual source.41
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Textual presenta-
tions of the crystallographic experimental details, listings of
crystallographic data, bond distances, bond angles, and posi-
tional and thermal parameters, and figures showing the unit
cells of compounds 3-5 (58 pages). Ordering information is
given on any current masthead page.
OM950988J
(40) MolEN, An Interactive Structure Solution Program; Enraf-
Nonius: Delft, The Netherlands, 1990.
(41) Cromer, D. T.; Waber, J . T. International Tables for X-ray
Crystallography; Kynoch Press: Birmingham, U.K., 1974; Vol. IV;
Table 2.
(42) Ryan, M. F.; Richardson, D. E.; Lichtenberger, D. L.; Gruhn,
N. E. Organometallics 1994, 13, 1190.
(43) Carpenter, B. K. Determination of Organic Reaction Mecha-
nisms; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1984.
(44) (a) Hoffmann, R.; Lipscomb, W. N. J . Chem. Phys. 1962, 36,
2179. (b) Hoffmann, R. J . Chem. Phys. 1963, 39, 1397.
(45) Ammeter, J . H.; Bu¨rgi, H.-B.; Thibeault, J . C.; Hoffmann, R.
J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 3686.
(46) Weast, R. C., Ed. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 56th
ed.; CRC Press: Cleveland, OH, 1975.
Electr och em ica l Stu d ies. All cyclic voltammograms were
obtained with a PAR Model 273 potentiostat/galvanostat,
equipped with positive feedback circuitry to compensate for
iR drop. The airtight cyclic voltammetry cell was based on a
three-electrode design, and the electrochemical experiments
(38) Mason, M. R.; Smith, J . M.; Bott, S. G.; Barron, A. R. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4971.
(39) Walker, N.; Stuart, D. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1983, 39, 159.