Organic Letters
Letter
a
were optimized as follows: Pd(OAc)2 (12.5 mol %), Cu(OAc)2
(30 mol %), and TFA (5.0 equiv) under an oxygen atmosphere
in DMSO at 80 °C.
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
With the optimal conditions in hand, we first investigated
the effect of the substituents on the left aromatic ring (Scheme
2, 2aa−2at). Both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing
b
TFA
yield
entry
Pd source
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2
Pd(TFA)2 Cu(OAc)2
PdCl2
Pd(PPh3)4 Cu(OAc)2
Pd(OH)2
Pd2(dba)3
-
additive
(equiv)
solvent
DMSO
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
21
61
58
17
47
57
59
NR
<20
a,b
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
other
Scheme 2. Substituents on the Left Aromatic Ring
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
Cu(OAc)2
c
9
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2
solvents
10
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2·
5.0
DMSO
52
H2O
11
12
13
14
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)
Pd(OAc)2 CuSO4
Pd(OAc)2 FeSO4
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
-
1.0
2.0
10.0
5.0
5.0
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
57
51
50
16
8
<65
65
trace
15
53
64
Pd(OAc)2 AgOAc
d
15
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2
e
16
f
17
f
18
f
19
f
20
f
21
f g
22 ,
82
83
a
f h
23 ,
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (12.5 mol %),
a
Cu(OAc)2 (30 mol %), and TFA (5.0 equiv) in DMSO (2 mL) at 80
°C for 48 h. Isolated yields.
Reaction conditions: 1aa (0.25 mmol), [Pd] (10 mol %), additive
b
b
c
(10 mol %), solvent (1 mL), 80 °C for 48 h. Isolated yield. Other
solvents: H2O, acetone, CH3CN, HOAc, EtOAc, DMF, formamide,
piperidine, 1,4-dioxane, toluene, xylene, benzene, MeOH, EtOH,
HFIP, CHCl3, THF. Without O2. Amount of Cu(OAc)2: 1 mol %
(48%), 5 mol % (54%), 50 mol % (64%), 1.0 equiv (59%), 2.0 equiv
groups were well tolerated, furnishing the desired products in
52−92% yields. Notably, the substrates bearing electron-
withdrawing groups (F, Cl, Br, CF3, CN) exhibited much
higher reactivity than that with electron-donating groups (Me,
OMe, Ph). Substituents at the otho, meta, or para positions had
no obvious effect on the reactions, although the substitution on
the otho position possessed larger steric hindrance. Disub-
stitution was also well tolerated (2aq−2as). These functional
substituent groups offered versatile handles for further
transformations. Moreover, the naphthyl substrate afforded
the desired product in 52% yield (2at). It is noteworthy that, in
all cases, only E-isomers were obtained, and no Z-isomers
could be detected by analyzing the reaction mixtures. The
structures of 2ah and 2am were confirmed by single-crystal X-
Next, we investigated the substituents on the right aromatic
ring (Scheme 3). Delightfully, the reaction also exhibited good
compatibility of various substituent groups. Substrates bearing
Me, OMe, F, Cl, and Br all performed well, giving the desired
1,4-enediones with complete E-stereoselectivity in good to
excellent yields (61−88%, 2ba−2bl).
d
e
f
g
(57%). 30 mol % Cu(OAc)2 was used. Pd(OAc)2 (12.5 mol %).
h
Pd(OAc)2 (15 mol %).
Gratifyingly, when Cu(OAc)2 (10 mol %) as the co-catalyst
was added into the reaction system, the yield was greatly
improved to 61% (entry 2). We then carefully investigated
other Pd sources such as Pd(TFA)2, PdCl2, Pd(PPh3)4,
Pd(OH)2, and Pd2(dba)3. Pd(OAc)2 was proved to be more
effective (entries 3−7). Subsequently, various solvents were
screened, and DMSO provided a better yield (entry 9). Then
with Pd(OAc)2 as the catalyst and DMSO as the solvent, the
other co-catalysts were investigated (entries 10−14). It should
be mentioned that Cu(OAc)2·H2O, CuOAc, CuSO4, FeSO4,
and AgOAc were effective co-catalysts for the reaction, while
Cu(OAc)2 was still the best choice. Next, the amount of
Cu(OAc)2 and TFA was investigated. Cu(OAc)2 (30 mol %)
and TFA (5.0 equiv) provided the best results (entries 16−
21). The yield was improved to 82% when the loading of
Pd(OAc)2 was increased to 12.5 mol % (entry 22), while a
further increase to Pd(OAc)2 (e.g., 15 mol %) did not improve
the yield obviously (entry 23). It is worth mentioning that
replacing O2 with other hydrogen acceptors such as H2O2, 3-
chloroperbenzoic acid, or allyl acetate led to inferior yields (see
were performed. The reaction could not proceed well in the
absence of the Pd(OAc)2, Cu(OAc)2, O2, or TFA (see the
Then, we turned our attention to another kind of ketones, 5-
arylpentan-2-ones (Scheme 4). As expected, these ketones
were suitable substrates. These reactions were not sensitive to
the electronic property and the position of substituent groups
on aromatic rings. A broad range of functional groups such as
t
Me, Bu, OMe, F, Cl, and Br were compatible with these
reaction conditions, and all of the substrates delivered the
desired products in good to excellent yields (70−93%, 4a−4k).
1217
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 1216−1221