them can also catalyze aldol reactions of hydroxyacetone to
exclusively give 1,2-diols with excellent regio- and enantio-
selectivity.4,8c In sharp contrast, an efficient catalyst for the
asymmetric direct aldol reactions of aldehydes with hydroxy-
acetone at its methyl group to give chiral 1,4-diols has not
yet reported, and thus it is much more difficult to directly
access optically active 1,4-diols than 1,2-diols by aldolization.
noncovalent bonding environment similar to that of an
enzyme, which is beneficial for stereocontrol, may be created
with an increase in the size of peptides.11 We report here
that L-proline-based peptides 1-5 can catalyze the aldol
reactions of hydroxyacetone with aldehydes 6 in aqueous
media12 to give 1,4-diols 7, the disfavored products, with
either aldolase or L-proline4,8c with high regio- and enantio-
selectivity.
First, we used 20 mol % Pro-Thr-OMe (1a), which
catalyzed the aldol reaction of acetone with 4-nitrobenz-
aldehyde in 67% ee,8f,9 to promote the aldol addition of
4-nitrobenzaldehyde (6a) with hydroxyacetone in THF to
give the normal anti-1,2-diol (8a) with 2.1: 1 dr and 61%
ee. The minor product 1,4-diol (7a) was also isolated in 16%
yield and 60% ee (Table 1, entry 1). A survey of different
Table 1. Direct Aldol Reaction of 4-Nitrobenzaldehyde with
Hydroxyacetone Catalyzed by Peptides 1-5a
% yield
ee
% yield
%
b
entry catalyst
solvent
THF
DMF
MeOH
CHCl3
of 7a
(%)c of 8a (dr)d eee
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1b
1c
1d
2a
2b
2c
3
16
7
60
55
68
69
54
54
62
67
52
56
68
68
56
75
76
78
82f
87g
71 (2.1:1) 61
69 (2.8:1) 72
76 (1.7:1) 63
71 (0.8:1) 23
17 (0.9:1) 19
20 (0.8:1) 10
13 (0.8:1) 28
30 (0.9:1) 37
38 (0.9:1) 16
35 (1.0:1) 25
30 (1.1:1) 33
30 (1.1:1) 32
30 (0.7:1) 22
30 (1.3:1) 35
35 (2.0:1) 41
58 (1.1:1) 29
18 (1.7:1) 47
21 (1.6:1) 30
Figure 1. Peptides evaluated in this study.
19
13
35
20
50
70
52
65
70
70
62
70
57
39
82
76
Very recently, we8f,9 and other groups10 found that L-
proline amides and dipeptides acted as efficient catalysts for
the asymmetric direct aldol reaction. Synthetic peptides have
proven to be promising organic catalysts for some important
transformations and continue to receive growing interest.11
On the basis of these observations, we reasoned that larger
L-proline-based peptides might be useful as organic catalysts
for direct aldol addition, since they are structurally similar
to L-proline amides but contain more amide units, which are
the same building blocks that constitute enzymes. A chiral
DMF/H2O
MeOH/H2O
THF/H2O
THF/H2O
THF/H2O
THF/H2O
THF/H2O
THF/H2O
THF/H2O
THF/H2O
THF/H2O
THF/H2O
THF/H2O
THF/H2O
4
5
3
4
(7) (a) Eder, U.; Sauer, G.; Wiechert, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1971, 10, 496. (b) Hajos, Z. G.; Parrish, D. R. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39,
1615.
a Unless specified otherwise, the concentration of aldehyde is 0.25 M,
and v/v of hydroxyacetone/solvent is 1/4 (1/5 vol hydroxyacetone). b Organic
solvent/H2O ) 1:1. c Ee values were determined by HPLC, and the
configuration was assigned as R by comparison of the optical rotation with
value in the literature.15 d Anti:syn ratio was determined by HPLC. e Ee
value of anti isomer, determined by HPLC. f Reaction temperature ) 0 °C;
v/v of hydroxyacetone/solvent ) 1/2 (1/3 vol hydroxyacetone); reaction
time ) 4 days. g Performed with 10 mol % catalyst 4; reaction temperature
) 0 °C; v/v of hydroxyacetone/solvent ) 1/2 (1/3 vol hydroxyacetone);
reaction time ) 6 days.
(8) (a) List, B.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 2395. (b) Sakthivel, K.; Notz, W.; Bui, T.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5260. (c) Notz, W.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 7386. (d) Northrup, A. B.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 6798. (e) Dickerson, T. J.; Janda, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 3220. (f) Tang, Z.; Jiang, F.; Yu, L.-T.; Cui, X.; Gong, L.-Z.; Mi,
A.-Q.; Jiang, Y.-Z.; Wu, Y.-D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5262. For
reviews, see: (g) List, B. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 5573. (h) List, B. Synlett
2001, 1675.
(9) Tang, Z.; Jiang, F.; Cui, X.; Gong, L.-Z.; Mi, A.-Q.; Jiang, Y.-Z.;
Wu, Y.-D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101, 5755.
(10) (a) Martin, H. J.; List, B. Synlett 2003, 1901. (b) Kofoed, J.; Nielsen,
J.; Reymond, J.-L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 2445.
(11) For examples, see: (a) Iyer, M. S.; Gigstad, K. M.; Namdev, N.
D.; Lipton, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4910. (b) Sigman, M. S.;
Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4901 (c) Miller, S. J.;
Copeland, G. T.; Papaioannou, N.; Horstmann, T. E.; Ruel, E. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1629. (d) Sculimbrene, B. R.; Miller, S. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10125. (e) Guerin, D. J.; Miller, S. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 2134. (f) Sculimbrene, B. R.; Morgan, A. J.; Miller, S. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11653. For a review, see: (g) Jarvo, E. R.;
Miller, S. J. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 2481.
solvents such as DMF, methanol, and chloroform revealed
that more polar solvents give better enantioselectivity of 1,2-
diol 8a than less polar solvents (entries 1-4). In DMF, anti-
1,2-diol was obtained with 2.8:1 dr and 72% ee (entry 2). In
a protic solvent, for example, MeOH, 1,4-diol was generated
in 19% yield (entry 3), which was a greater yield than in
nonprotic solvents (entries 1, 2, and 4). Surprisingly, the aldol
2286
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 13, 2004