A. Orzeszko et al. • Investigation of the Thionation Reaction of Cyclic Imides_______________________________ 1037
Table 2. Melting points and spectroscopic data of monothio- (a) and dithioimides (b).
Com-
pound
m.p. [°C]
'H NMR (CDCI
3
): <3, /(Hz)
FTIR
CO
(KBr) v [cm *]
CS
la
lb
2a
2b
3a
4a
5a
5b
6a
8a
7.66 (m, 2H, C
8.19 (m, 1H, C
7.45 (m, 2H, C
6
6
6
H4), 7.93 (m, 1H, C
H4), 10.30 (s, 1H, N -H )
H4), 8.24 (m, 2H, C H4),
6
H4),
1297,
1322
176 (lit. 174) [11]
1742
6
198 (lit. 184) [10, 11]
13.31 (s, 1H, N -H )
3.46 (s, 3H, CH,), 7.77 (m, 3H, C
6
H4),
H4),
1737
1322
102 (lit. 94) [2]
7.96 (m, 1H, C H4)
6
3.76 (s, 3H, CH,), 7.60 (m, 1H, C
7.72 (m, 2H, C H4)
2.85-1.71 (m, 15H, adam.), 7.62 (m, 3H,
H4), 7.87 (m, 1H, C H4)
5. 11 (s, 9H, CH,), 7.73 (m, 2H, C
7.87 (m, 1H, C H4), 7.91 (m, 1H, C
7.34-7.18 (m, 5H, C H5), 7.86 (m, 3H,
6
1323
107 (lit. 104) [5]
6
1747
1742
1747
134
1256
C
6
6
6
H4),
H4)
1311
115
6
6
6
1302
140
C
6
H4), 8.12 (m, 1H, C
6
H4)
6.89 (m, 1H, C
7.68 (m, 2H, C
6
H^), 7.20 (m, 4H, C
H4), 8.16 (m, 2H, C
6
6
H5),
H4)
1298
156
6
7.60 (d,2J=
8
.6
, 1H, C
6
H,), 7.67 (d, 2/=
8
.6
,
1745
1754
1262
250-252
201-204
1H, C
6
H2), 8.83 (s, 1H, N -H )
7.88 (s, 1H, C
6
H2), 8.04 (s, 1H, C
6
H2), 8.85
1268
(s, 1H, N -H )
8b
9b
7.95 (s, 2H, C
6
H2), 9.75 (s, 1H, N -H )
1270
1265
212-215
296-299
7.45 (m, 2H, C1 0 H6), 7.99 (m, 2H, C10 H6),
8.78 (m, 2H, C1 0 Hfi), 9.40 (s, 1H, N -H )
3,66 (s, 3H, CH,), 7.80 (m, 5H, C1 0 H6),
10a
10b
11a
218-219
302-306
82
1685
1732
1286
1291
1342
8.73 (m, 1H, C (,H6)
1
4.16 (s, 3H, CH,), 7.56 (m, 2H, C10 H6),
7.99 (m, 2H, C1 0 H6), 8.60 (m, 2H, C10 H6)
3.35 (s, 3H, CH,), 8.22 (d, 2J= 5.8, 1H,
C
2
H2), 9.66 (d, 2J= 5.8, 1H, C H2)
2
does not react with LR at all. The yields of thiona- ides, they yield quite different amounts of pro-
tion reactions differ substantially. These pheno-
mena could be explained in two ways: The m echa- methylphthalimide
ducts. The unsubstituted phthalimide 1 and N-
are easily converted quanti-
2
nism shown in Scheme 1 suggests that the polarity
of the carbonyl group should play an im portant
role in this reaction. In Table 1 the formal charges
calculated for carbonyl groups of the starting
imides and, in parentheses of the respective mono-
tatively into both monothio- and dithioimides.
Substrates with large N-substituents, 3 and 4, give
only small amounts of monothio- derivatives, and
in the case of N-phenylphthalimide 5 monothio-
and dithioimide. Also, isomers
6
and
8
react dif-
, but
thioimides are given. The naphthalimides 9 and 10, ferently. Chlorine atoms in position 3 and
6
possessing the most polar carbonyl bands, react
with LR almost quantitatively and give mainly
dithioimides. Af-methylmaleimide 11, the substrate
with the least polar C = 0 bonds, forms only the
monothioimide with 53% yield. The replacem ent
of one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms by sulfur
not in positions 4 and 5, exert a steric hindrance
which inhibits thionation reactions. As m entioned
above, the most significant effect appears for N-(t-
butyl)-3,6-dichlorophthalimide 7. In this case the
r-butyl group and the two chlorine atoms in the
vicinity of the carbonyl groups suppress thiona-
does not influence the polarity of the second car- tion completely.
bonyl group.
The different reactivity of phthalimides, naph-
The polarity of the C = 0 groups is not the only
factor determining the thionation reaction. While
thalimides and maleimide could be explained as a
result of different formal charges in their carbonyl
groups, but the different reactivity of the reported
compounds
1
and
2
have partial charges similar to
Af-(adamant-l-yl) and N-(f-butyl) substituted im- group of imides might be ascribed to the steric
Brought to you by | New York University Bobst Library Technical Services
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/28/15 1:27 PM