Organic Letters
Letter
a
Scheme 3. Oxazole Synthesis by Asmic-ester Condensation
Scheme 4. BH3-Promoted Sulfanyl−Lithium Exchange−
a
Trapping
a
General Procedure: A THF solution of BH3·THF (1.1−1.2 equiv)
was added to a rt, THF solution of 14 (1.0 equiv) that was, after 30−
40 min, cooled to −78 °C. BuLi (1.75−2.2 equiv) was added
followed, after 30−40 min, by the electrophile (1−2 equiv). After
warming to rt, a 1:1 mixture of EtOH and 1 M HCl was added, and
after 16 h, the crude mixture was concentrated and then extracted
with EtOAc to afford a crude material that was chromatographed to
a
General procedure: Addition of BuLi (1.05−1.1 equiv) to a −78 °C,
a
THF solution of Asmic was followed, after 5−10 min, by the neat
ester (1.1 equiv). After 1−2 h, the reaction was allowed to warm to rt,
and after 1−2 h, saturated, aqueous NH4Cl was added, to give, after
afford the pure oxazole. An exchange stannylation−protodestanny-
lation sequence afforded 11a in 95% yield.
b
workup and chromatography, the pure oxazole. 2.0 equiv of LDA
protonation of 10 afforded 11f whereas exchange−trapping
with aldehydes or carbon dioxide afforded the corresponding
oxazoles 11g−i.
The anisylsulfanyl−lithium exchange is envisaged to occur
through a chelation-assisted attack of BuLi on the BH3-
complexed oxazole (13, Scheme 5). Complexation of BuLi to
were used to deprotonate Asmic.
preference to the sulfur-anisyl bond. Raney-nickel hydro-
genolysis15 (10 → 11a) provided a route to reductively
exchange the C-4 anisylsulfanyl group (eq 1) whereas exchange
Scheme 5. Sulfanyl−Lithium Exchange Mechanism
processes via catalytic coupling16 or sulfur−lithium exchange
processes identified the latter as more promising.17 After some
optimization, a selective exchange was achieved with the TIPS-
protected oxazole 1018 as a prototype (Scheme 4); critical for
the success was complexation of the oxazole with BH3.19
Borane complexation likely reduces the electron density in the
oxazole 12 to favor a selective BuLi-initiated sulfanyl-lithium
exchange. Operationally, the sequential addition of BH3·THF,
BuLi,20 and an electrophile afforded a range of substituted
oxazoles (Scheme 4). Electrophilic bromination with
BrCl2CCCl2Br followed by addition of saturated, aqueous
NH4Cl afforded bromooxazole 11b,21 whereas a more acidic
workup with ethanolic-HCl afforded the desilylated, debory-
lated bromooxazole 11c. The iodination of 10 to afford 11d
was achieved through a highly unusual reverse lithium−iodine
exchange with iodoacetonitrile serving as the electrophilic
iodine source.22 Trapping with Bu3SnCl afforded the
stannyloxazole 11e that was isolated as the stable BH3
complex;23 an analogous reaction with Me3SnCl afforded a
stannyloxazole that was particularly susceptible to proto-
destannylation, providing oxazole 11f (95% yield) after
exposure to acetic acid. Halooxazoles and stannyl oxazoles
similar to 11b−e are used as coupling partners for the
synthesis of complex oxazoles.24 The direct exchange−
the methoxy group25 facilitates the nucleophilic attack on
sulfur to generate the sulfuranylide26 14 either as a transition
structure en route to the lithiated oxazole 15 or as the
nucleophile; no exchange occurs on similar substrates in the
absence of an o-methoxy group.27,12b Electrophilic trapping at
C-4 followed by acid-promoted deborylation affords the
oxazole 11.28
The versatility of the Asmic-addition−exchange strategy was
illustrated via a three-step synthesis of the bioactive agent
streptochlorin (Scheme 6, 18).29 Deprotonation of Asmic (5)
followed by trapping with the indole carboxylate 16 gave
oxazole 9i. TIPS protection of 9i with KHMDS and TIPSOTf
followed by sulfanyl−lithium exchange, trapping with hexa-
chlorethane, and global deprotection efficiently gave strepto-
chlorin (18).
1501
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 1500−1503