G Model
CCLET-6131; No. of Pages 6
H. Li, H. Liu, Y. Zhang et al.
Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx
substituents (R1 = Me, R2 = Br, R = 2-NO2Ph), tri-amide compound
15h had much higher insecticidal activity than that of di-amide
compound 15f (70.0% at 0.1 mg/L (15h) vs. 45.0% at 10 mg/L (15f)).
For the di-amide compounds 15a-15g, when R2 was fixed as Br, the
R group in the piperazine of the corresponding compounds
exhibited an activity trend: 2-ClPh > 2-MePh > Me > 4-Cl-2-NO2Ph
> 2-NO2Ph > 2,4-Cl2Bn (15e > 15d > 15b > 15 g > 15f > 15c); when
R = Me, the activity trend for R2 group is CF3CH2O > Br (15a > 15b).
For the tri-amide compounds 15h-15o, when R1 = Cl and R2 = Br,
the R group indicated an activity sequence: Me > 2-ClPh > 2,4-
Cl2Bn > 2-MePh > 4-CF3Pyrimidyl > 2-NO2Ph (15j > 15m > 15k >
15l > 15o > 15n); when R1 and R were fixed as Cl and Me,
respectively, the R2 group in corresponding compounds showed an
activity trend of Br > Cl (15j > 15i); when R2 and R were fixed as Br
and 2-NO2Ph, respectively, the R1 group displayed an activity
sequence of Me > Cl (15h > 15n). The results indicated that the
piperazine moiety containing various groups have significant
influence on the insecticidal activity of such novel di- and tri-
amide compounds; a possible synergistic effect of substituted
piperazine moiety with other groups such as pyridylpyrazole, two
amide bonds (one “NH” and one “non-NH”) and three amide bonds
(three “non-NH”) may contribute to the favorable insecticidal
activity of this type of compounds.
From the same Table 2, it was found that compound 16 also
show high insecticidal activity and can even possess 61.0% lethality
rate at a lower test concentration of 0.1 mg/L towards diamond-
back moth. As mentioned above, compound 16 is derived from
both compound M (from pharmacophore-based virtual screening
[13]) and chlorantraniliprole. Based on the common anthranilic
diamide skeleton, the structural difference of compound 16 and
chlorantraniliprole is that the former has a phenylfuran group and
the latter has a pyridylpyrazole group. Although less effective than
chlorantraniliprole, compound 16 might provide an useful refer-
ence for further design and development of new insecticidal
agents, owing to its novel heterocyclic structure of phenylfuran.
In addition, some compounds with high insecticidal activity
against diamondback moth were made further investigation on
LC50 values. As shown in Table 3, compounds 15a,15e, and 15i-15m
displayed favourable larvicidal activity against diamondback moth
with LC50 value of 0.0022ꢀ0.0237 mg/L. Among which, 15i-15 m
whose LC50 values were 0.0022ꢀ0.0081 mg/L, were comparable
with that of chlorantraniliprole (0.0031 mg/L). Particularly, 15i,
15m, and 15l held LC50 values of 0.0042 mg/L, 0.0035 mg/L, and
0.0022 mg/L, respectively, close to even superior to chlorantrani-
liprole (0.0031 mg/L) under the same bioassay conditions.
As shown in Tables 1 and 4, most of the title compounds 8,14,15
and 16 mainly exhibited apparent insecticidal activity against
oriental armyworm at 200 mg/L. Partial compounds were found to
retain good activity at lower dosages, better than that of compound
M. For examples, 14a, 14c, 15f, 15g, 15k, and 15l possessed lethality
rate of 40.0%–100% at 100 mg/L; 14a, 15g, and 15l at 50 mg/L
showed larvicidal activity of 60.0%, 70.0%, and 40.0%, respectively.
The substituent (R) in the piperazine ring also had an impact on the
insecticidal activity of the corresponding compounds in some
extent. Take the situation in compounds 15 as an example, the
structure-activity relationship indicated that the R substituent
showed an activity sequence of 4-Cl-2-NO2Ph > 2-NO2Ph > 2-ClPh
> 2-MePh, 2,4-Cl2Bn > Me for the di-amide compounds 15b-15g
(R1 = Me, R2 = Br), and 2-MePh > 2,4-Cl2Bn > 2-NO2Ph > 2-ClPh, 4-
CF3Pyrimidyl > Me for the tri-amide compounds 15j-15o (R1 = Cl,
R2 = Br), respectively.
Table 2
Larvicidal activities of the title compounds 14a-14 g, 15a-15o, 16 and chloran-
traniliprole against diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.).
Compd.
Activity (%) at a concentration of (mg/L)
200
100
10
1
0.1
0.01
14a
14b
14c
14d
14e
14f
14 g
15a
15b
15c
15d
15e
15f
15 g
15 h
15i
15 j
15k
15l
100
75.0
0
100
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
70.0 n.t.
100
100
67.0
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.*
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
70.0
40.0
80.0
100
100
100
75.0
100
100
90.0
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
90.0 75.0 40.0
80.0 50.0 n.t.
n.t.
88.0 65.0 27.0
93.0 78.0 45.0
60.0 n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
100
100
77.0
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
45.0 n.t.
85.0 n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
n.t.
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
90.0 70.0 30.0
100
100
100
100
100
85.0 60.0
100 83.0
90.0 70.0
87.0
100
60.0
75.0
n.t.
15 m
15n
15o
16
70.0 37.0
75.0 44.0 n.t.
90.0 61.0
100 100
n.t.
Chlorantraniliprole 100
80.0 (0.001 mg/L)
*
n.t. – not test.
Table 3
LC50 values of compounds 15a, 15e, 15i, 15j, 15k, 15l, 15m and chlorantraniliprole
against diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.).
Compd.
y = a + bx
LC50 (mg/L)
R
15a
15e
15i
15 j
15k
15l
y = 6.43 + 0.88x
y = 6.78 + 0.93x
y = 10.14 + 2.17x
y = 9.91 + 2.21x
y = 10.20 + 2.48x
y = 10.25 + 1.97x
y = 10.05 + 2.06x
y = 10.64 + 2.25x
0.0237
0.0122
0.0042
0.0059
0.0081
0.0022
0.0035
0.0031
0.9609
0.9643
0.9920
0.9916
0.9952
0.9846
0.9859
0.9812
15 m
chlorantraniliprole
As shown in Table 2, mono-amide derivatives 14a-14g which
were derived from a structural modification of compounds 8 by a
substitution of phenylfuran group with N-pyridylpyrazole group
mostly exhibited good larvicidal activity against diamondback
moth at 200 mg/L (70.0%– 100%). At lower test concentrations,
most of compounds 14 generally exhibited lower insecticidal
potential than that of compounds 8 except that 14a had a lethality
rate of 67.0% towards diamondback moth at 10 mg/L.
From the data listed in Table 2, we can see that almost all the
compounds 15 showed excellent insecticidal activity against
diamondback moth at 200 mg/L and 100 mg/L. At lower concen-
trations, compounds 15a, 15b, 15d, 15e, and 15h-15o held 70.0%–
100% lethality rate at 1 mg/L; especially, compounds 15i-15m still
possessed 60.0%–83.0% activity at 0.1 mg/L, close to that of
chlorantraniliprole.
An overall structure-activity relationship based on the dia-
mondback moth bioassay data of compounds 15 could be
concluded as follows. For one thing, a combination of pipera-
zine-containing arylamine and pyridylpyrazole groups would
generate very high insecticidal effect. For another, the tri-amide-
like derivatives (di-acylated compounds) were more effective
than the di-amide derivatives (mono-acylated compounds) in
general. For example, under situation of bearing the same
According to the bioassay results of these synthesized com-
pounds towards diamondback moth and oriental armyworm, some
novel piperazine-containing mono-/di-/tri-amide compounds
such as 8 g, 14a, 15a, 15g, 15i, 15j, 15k, 15l, and 15m could be
used as new insecticidal leading compounds for further
5