CYP2J2-Mediated Metabolism of Endocannabinoids
619
donkey anti-rabbit antibody (Antibodies-Online, Inc.) was used for
detection. Blots were visualized using a HRP development solution
(Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a ChemiDoc XRS1 system (Bio-Rad,
Hercules, CA).
injection volume was 5 ml. Mass spectra were acquired with negative ESI,
and the ion spray voltage was 24500 V. The source temperature was 450°C.
The curtain gas, ion source gas 1, and ion source gas 2 were 32, 50, and
65, respectively. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was used to quantify
Saponification of EET-G Regioisomers to EETs and Quan- EETs, as follows: 5(6)-EET m/z 319.2→191.0; 8(9)-EET m/z 319.2→155.1;
tification. For the quantification of EET-G in solution, the extracted 11(12)-EET m/z 319.2→167.0; 14(15)-EET m/z 319.2→219.1; internal
fatty acids were cleaved from the glycerol backbone using methanolic
potassium hydroxide (KOH) hydrolysis, as previously described (Capdevila
et al., 1991). Extracted samples were hydrolyzed in 1 ml of methanol
containing 0.4 N KOH and incubated at 50°C for 1 hour. Next, 1.5 ml
Millipore water was added, and glacial acetic acid was added to achieve
pH 3–4. Samples were extracted with an equal volume of ice-cold ethyl
acetate (3ꢀ), vortexed 1 minute, and centrifuged at 1600g for 3 minutes
for phase separation (Stark et al., 2008). The organic layer was removed
and dried under a steady stream of N2 and then reconstituted with 100 ml
methanol. Thus, the saponified sample contained both free EETs
originally present in solution and EETs derived from EET-G hydrolysis.
EET-G quantification at the time of reaction quenching was calculated
using eq. 1:
standard (6)16(17)-epoxy-4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,19Z-docosapentaenoic acid m/z
343.2→274.1.
Quantification of 14,15-EET-EA samples was analyzed using the
5500 QTRAP LC/MS/MS system with a LC separation method consisting
of 0–1 minute, 50% A; 5–17 minutes, 0% A; and then returned to initial
conditions. The autosampler was set at 5°C. The injection volume was
2 ml. Mass spectra were acquired with positive ESI, and the ion spray
voltage was 5500 V. The source temperature was 450°C. The curtain
gas, ion source gas 1, and ion source gas 2 were 32, 50, and 65,
respectively. MRM was used to quantify 14(15)-EET ethanolamide
(m/z 364.3→346.3) with spiked anandamide-d4 (m/z 352.3→287.2)
as the internal standard).
Direct quantification of the 14,15-EET-G regioisomer was analyzed
using the 5500 QTRAP LC/MS/MS system with a linear gradient, as
follows: 0–2 minutes, 90% A; 8 minutes, 55% A; 13–25 minutes, 40%
A; 30 minutes, 30% A; 35 minutes, 25% A; 40 minutes, 2% A; 45–47
minutes, 15% A; 48–56 minutes, 0% A; and then returned to initial
conditions. Mass spectra were acquired under positive (ion spray voltage
at 5500 V) ESI. The source temperature was 450°C. The 14,15-EET-G
(m/z 395.3→377.3) was measured in positive ESI with arachidonoyl-1-
thio-glycerol (m/z 395.3→287.3) as an internal standard.
EET‐G 5 EETðsaponifiedÞ–FreeꢀEET
(1)
Extracted EET-G regioisomers were converted to their corresponding
EETs using methanolic KOH (0.4 N) and quantified using LC-MS/MS,
as described below.
Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Mass
Spectrometry Product Analysis. AA, AEA, and 2-AG regioisomers
were resolved using a XTerra C18 column 2.1 ꢀ 150 mm, 3.5 mM
(Waters), and a Waters Alliance 2695 reversed-phase high performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to an electrospray ionization
(ESI) source. For analysis of AA and AEA metabolites, the mobile
phases consisted of mobile phase A (acetonitrile/H2O/formic acid, 95:5:
0.1) and mobile phase B (acetonitrile/H2O/formic acid, 5:95:0.1) and
were run with a linear gradient as follows: 0–1 minute, 60% A;
41 minutes, 20% A; 42 minutes, 0% A; and then returned to initial
conditions. The same solvent system was used in the analysis of
2-AG metabolites with a linear gradient as follows: 0–1 minute, 70%
A; 51 minutes, 20% A; 52 minutes, 0% A; and then returned to initial
conditions. For ESI, a Q-TOF Ultima time-of-flight mass spectrom-
eter was used in positive ion mode for analysis of AEA, with a spray
voltage of 4.5 V and capillary temperature of 200°C. Data were
collected and processed using Mass Lynx software (version 4.1), initially
scanning from 200 to 800 m/z and processed for the selected AEA-EET
m/z of 364. The mass and elution time of the 14,15-EET-EA moiety
were confirmed using the commercially available authentic standard.
The detection of AA and 2-AG metabolites was detected with the same
system in negative ion mode, with a cone voltage of 35 V and a 200°C
desolvation temperature, scanning from 200 to 800 m/z and processed
for the selected EET m/z of 319 and EET-G m/z of 393–394. The mass
and elution times of the EET regioisomers were confirmed with com-
mercially available authentic standards. For 2-AG analysis, the mass
and elution time of the commercially available 14,15-EET-G, EETs, and
AA lipids were confirmed with authentic standards purchased from
Cayman Chemical.
Quantification of CYP2J2-ND Rate of 2-AG Ester Cleavage.
The rate of 2-AG ester cleavage was quantified using a HPLC system
consisting of an Alliance 2695 analytical separation module (Waters)
coupled to a Waters 996 photodiode array and a XTerra C18 column, 1.3 Å,
2.1 mm ꢀ 50 mm, 3.5 mm pore size column (Waters). The mobile system
was composed of two solutions, as follows: solvent A (H2O/ACN/AcOH 95:
5:0.1) and solvent B (H2O/ACN/AcOH 5:95:0.1). The linear gradient was
as follows: 0–1 minute, 60% A; 30 minutes, 20% A; 31 minutes, 0% A;
then returned to initial conditions. Elution times of 12.6 minutes for
2-AG and 19.7 minutes for AA were verified with authentic standards.
Quantification of free AA was calculated using AA absorbance at
204 nm. For kinetic analysis, samples containing CYP2J2-ND (50 pmol;
0.2 mM), CPR (150 pmol; 0.6 mM), and 0.1% BHT in 0.1 M phosphate
buffer (pH 7.4) were incubated at 37°C for 5 minutes with 1, 5, 10, 20,
40, and 80 mM 2-AG before initiation of reaction with 1 mM NADPH at
37°C for 20 minutes. Controls lacking either NADPH or CYP2J2 were
run simultaneously with 80 mM 2-AG.
CYP2J2 Molecular Operating Environment Homology Mod-
eling. A multiple sequence alignment was performed using the protein
data bank to cross-reference the CYP2J2 sequence against 2A1, 2D6,
2E1, 2R1, 2A6, 2C8, 2B4, 2C5, 2C9, and 2A13. For construction of the
CYP2J2 homology model, crystal structure Protein Data Bank coor-
dinates were used for the isozymes with the closest homology to 2J2 and
included CYP2B4 (backbone, 42% primary sequence homology), 2C8
(B region, 38% primary sequence homology), 2R1 (FG region, 40%
primary sequence homology), and 2C9 (b4 region, 26% primary
sequence homology). An open CYP2J2 conformation was initially
used to dock AA, AEA, and 2-AG following previously described
procedures (Baudry et al., 2003). Two apparent CYP2J2 active site
cavities exhibited adjacent/overlapping areas near the heme in agree-
ment with the highest propensity of ligand-binding number and were
both used for docking of each respective substrate. Next, we conducted an
Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry for
Quantitation of 14,15-, 11,12-, 8,9-, 5,6-EETs, 14,15-EET-EA, and
14,15-EET-G. Quantification EET regioisomers derived from in vitro
CYP2J2 incubations were analyzed with the 5500 QTRAP LC-MS/MS
system (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA) with a 1200 series HPLC system energy minimization step for each respective ligand conformation, and
(Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), including a degasser, an
the induced fitting resulted in the CYP2J2-substrate model used to
autosampler, and a binary pump. The LC separation was performed on examine heme and ligand distances as well as the predicted interacting
an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB C18 column (4.6 ꢀ 150 mm, 5 mm; Agilent
Technologies) with mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water) and mobile
phase B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile). The flow rate was 0.4 ml/min.
active site residues. Lastly, interaction energies were calculated for each
substrate to examine the energetics and feasibility of substrate binding.
Spectral Titrations of CYP2J2-ND. Spectral binding studies
The linear gradient was as follows: 0–2 minutes, 90% A; 8 minutes, 50% were performed by titrating AA (both AA and sodium arachidonate),
A; 13–25 minutes, 25% A; 30 minutes, 20% A; 35 minutes, 15% A; and AEA, 2-AG, MS-PPOH, and ebastine against CYP2J2-NDs (8 mM) in
then returned to initial conditions. The autosampler was set at 5°C. The 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Importantly, substrate stocks