OBn
O
OPiv
O
Removal of both the phthalimido and acetate groups from 20
was accomplished by treatment with hydrazine hydrate in
ethanol (1:9, v/v) at 80 °C followed by N-acetylation to give 23
in 65% yield. Condensation of sialic acid donor 10 with 23 at
240 °C followed by O-acetylation gave 24 in 35% yield (based
on 23 consumed). The synthesis of 4 from 24 was achieved by
a sequence of reactions similar to those described for the
preparation of 3 from 21. The structures of 1–4 were confirmed
by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy.†
Our preliminary examination of Galb1,4(6-sulfo)
GlcNAcb1,3 Galb1,4(6-sulfo) GlcNAcb-O-Me (3) and Neu-
Aca2,3Galb1,4(6-sulfo)GlcNAcb1,3Galb1,4(6-sulfo)
GlcNAcb-O-Me (4) indicated that both of these compounds
were equally active as acceptors for human colon tumour a1,3-
l -fucosyltransferase.
HO
HO
i, ii, iii, iv
12
O
OMe
AcO
NPhth
OAc
19
v
13
20
vi
OAc
O
OR
OR
OAc
O
AcO
AcO
AcO
O
O
O
OMe
NHAc
O
O
AcO
AcO
NHAc
OAc
OAc
21 R = Bn
22 R = H
vii
viii, ix
These investigations were supported by Grant No. CA 63218
awarded by the National Cancer Institute.
3
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i, MeOH–CH2Cl2 (1:1, v/v), MeONa,
0 °C, 2 h, 85%; ii, DMP, PTS, room temp., 1.5 h, 89%; iii, pyridine–Ac2O
(2:1, v/v), room temp., 12 h, 89%; iv, 70% aq. AcOH, 65 °C, 2.5 h, 66%;
v, 13 (0.95 equiv.), NIS (3.0 equiv.)–triflic acid, 220 °C, 1 h, 54%; vi,
EtOH–hydrazine hydrate (4:1, v/v), 100 °C, 16 h, pyridine–Ac2O (2:1,
v/v), room temp., 12 h, 84%; vii, 10% Pd–C, H2, MeOH, 16 h; 50%; viii,
SO3–pyridine complex in DMF (10 equiv.), 0 °C, 16 h; ix, MeOH–MeONa,
16 h; Na+ resin, 35% from 22
Footnote
† Selected data for 1: [a]D 7 (c 1.5, H2O) [lit.,12 212.2 (c 0.5, H2O)]; 13
C
NMR (D2O, 100.6 MHz): d 101.86 (C-1AAA), 101.72 (C-1A), 101.45 (C-1B),
98.81 (C-1), 81.04 (C-3A), 77.49 (C-3AAA), 73.89 (C-4B), 73.85 (C-4), 59.90
(C-6AAA and C-6A), 59.09 (C-6B), 58.85 (C-6), 54.19 (C-2B), 53.99 (C-2). For
2: [a]D +186 (c 0.2, H2O); 1H NMR (D2O, 400 MHz): d 4.84 (d, J = 12 Hz,
20
i
OBn
O
OPiv
O
OBn
O
OPiv
O
HO
HO
HO
O
OMe
O
O
HO
HO
NHAc
NHAc
23
OH
OH
10 ii, iii
OAc
OR
OPiv
OR
OPiv
O
OAc
AcO
CO2Me
O
OAc
O
O
O
O
O
OMe
NHAc
AcO
AcHN
O
O
AcO
AcO
NHAc
OAc
OAc
OAc
24 R = Bn
25 R = H
iv
v, vi
4
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: i, EtOH–hydrazine hydrate (9:1, v/v), 80 °C, 1 h, MeOH–Et3N–Ac2O (4:2:1), room temp., 2 h, 65%; ii, 10 (2.50 equiv.),
NIS (3.0 equiv.)–triflic acid, MeCN, 240 °C, 1 h; iii, pyridine–Ac2O (2:1, v/v), room temp., 12 h, 35% based on 23 consumed; iv, 10% Pd–C, H2 MeOH,
24 h; v, SO3–pyridine complex in DMF (10 equiv.), room temp., 2 h; vi, MeOH–MeONa, 48 h; H2O, 4 h, Na+ resin, 56% from 24
Selective sulfation of 18 with SO3–pyridine complex in
pyridine at 5 °C provided the 3-O-sulfo compound which upon
removal of its phthalimido group (MeOH–hydrazine hydrate,
100 °C) and N-acetylation followed by de-O-acetylation
(MeOH–MeONa) gave the known compound 1 (55% from
18).4
A similar NIS–triflic acid reaction of 18 with sialic acid
donor 10 provided the crude pentasaccharide. The conversion of
this intermediate into target compound 2 (23% from 18) was
then carried out in 4 steps: (i) LiI–pyridine (methyl ester to
acid), (ii) MeOH–hydrazine hydrate (phthalimido group re-
moval), (iii) Ac2O–MeOH–CH2Cl2 (N-acetylation) and (iv)
MeOH–MeONa (de-O-acetylation).
H-1B), 4.69 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, H-1), 4.50 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-1AAA), 4.41 (d,
J = 8.0 Hz, H-1A), 2.71 (dd, J = 4.6 Hz, H-3BBe), 1.99 and 1.88 (each s,
33NAc), 1.75 (t, J = 1.2 Hz, H-3BBa); 13C NMR: d 101.86 (C-1AAA), 101.73
(C-1A), 101.55 (C-1B), 98.79 (C-1), 81.04 (C-3A), 77.49 (C-3AAA), 74.49
(C-4B), 74.15 (C-4), 61.58 (C-9BB), 59.99 (C-6AAA), 59.91 (C-6A), 59.09
(C-6B), 58.86 (C-6), 54.17 (C- 2B), 53.99 (C-2), 50.68 (C-5B), 38.63
(C-3BB); m/z 1128.5 (M 2 Na)2. For 3: [a]D +21 (c 0.6, H2O); 13C NMR:
d 101.84 (C-1AAA), 101.67 (C-1A), 101.56 (C-1B), 100.94 (C-1), 81.46 (C-3A),
76.88 (C-3AAA), 74.33 (C-4B), 74.05 (C-4), 67.63 (C-6BA), 67.36 (C-6), 60.11
(C-6AAA), 60.02 (C-6A), 56.19 (OMe), 54.15 (C-2B), 53.91 (C-2); m/z 942.9 (M
2 Na)2. For 4: [a]D +24 (c 0.7, H2O); 13C NMR: d 101.84 (C-1AAA), 101.60
(C-1A), 101.15 (C-1B), 100.92 (C-1), 98.73 (C-2BB), 81.50 (C-3A), 76.79
(C-3AAA), 74.29 (C-4B), 74.02 (C-4), 67.29 (C-6B), 67.08 (C-6), 61.52 (C-9BB),
60.01 (C-6A and C-6AAA), 56.17 (OMe), 54.09 (C-2B), 53.06 (C-2), 50.60
(C-5BB), 38.57 (C-3BB).
The synthesis of 3 and 4 (Schemes 2 and 3) involved the
glycosylation of 8 with fluoride 9 under conditions similar to
those described for the preparation of 15 (from 5), followed by
acetylation to give donor 13 along with some 1?3 linked
disaccharide. Condensation of 13 with 19 under NIS–triflic acid
conditions at 220 °C provided 20 in 54% yield. The formation
of 21 from 20 was achieved by the treatment with hydrazine
hydrate in ethanol (1:4, v/v) at 100 °C followed by acetylation
with pyridine–acetic anhydride in 84% yield. The removal of O-
benzyl (10% Pd–C) gave diol 22 which on sulfation with SO3–
pyridine complex in DMF and followed by de-O-acetylation
gave compound 3 in 35% yield (from 22).
References
1 R. K. Jain, R. Vig, R. D. Locke, A. Mohammad and K. L. Matta, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1996, 65.
2 T. Mukaiyama, Y. Murai and S. Shoda, Chem. Lett., 1981, 431;
T. Mukaiyama, Y. Hashimoto and S. Shoda, Chem. Lett., 1983, 935.
3 G. Catelani, F. Colonna and A. Marra, Carbohydr. Res., 1988, 182,
297.
4 G. V. Reddy, R. K. Jain, R. D. Locke and K. L. Matta, Carbohydr. Res.,
1996, 280, 261.
Received, 5th August 1996; Com. 6/05439K
24
Chem. Commun., 1997