3482 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 119, No. 15, 1997
Collman et al.
bar and a rubber stopper was charged with R,R,R,R-tetrakis(o-
aminophenyl)porphyrin (1.029 g, 1.53 mmol), CH2Cl2 (80 mL), and
triethylamine (10 mL). Also in the inert atmosphere box, acryloyl
chloride (0.6 mL) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (40 mL) and loaded into a
50 mL syringe. The syringe and flask were removed from the box,
and the flask was placed under a positive pressure of dry nitrogen.
The acryloyl chloride solution was added to the flask via syringe pump
at 10 mL/h. The solution was stirred for 24 h, washed with saturated
aqueous sodium bicarbonate (4 × 75 mL) and saturated aqueous sodium
chloride (1 × 100 mL), dried over sodium sulfate, filtered, and loaded
directly onto a flash silica gel column which had been prepared as a
CH2Cl2 slurry. The product was eluted with 20% acetone/CH2Cl2. Upon
removal of the solvent, the desired product was obtained (620 mg, 46%).
1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.86 (s, 4H); 8.83 (m, 4H); 7.95 (d, J ) 7.2 Hz,
4H); 7.88 (t, J ) 7.3 Hz, 4H); 7.54 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 4H); 6.93 (s, 4H);
5.93 (d, J ) 16.6 Hz, 4H); 5.04 (m, 8H); 1.54 (s, 4H); 1.25 (br s, 2H)
water; -2.77 (s, 2H). MS: m/e ) 890.9 (M+) for C56H42N8O4
(LSIMS). Anal. Calcd for C56H42N8O4‚H2O (water identified by
NMR): C, 73.99; H, 4.88; N, 12.33. Found: C, 74.08; H, 4.90; N,
12.08. UV-vis (toluene): λmax 422 (Soret), 516, 548, 588, 644 nm.
Iron Insertion. Iron insertion was performed in an inert atmosphere
box. In a typical reaction, a 100 mL round bottom flask equipped
with a stir bar and 45 cm Vigreux column was charged with the Michael
acceptor porphyrin (140 mg, 0.2 mmol), tetrahydrofuran (50 mL), and
2,6-lutidine (40 drops). The reaction was heated to reflux, and
anhydrous FeBr2 (400 mg, 3 mmol) was added. After the reaction
was heated at reflux for 12 h, the solvent was removed in Vacuo and
the residue dissolved in tetrahydrofuran/benzene (1:10), filtered through
a coarse frit, and loaded directly onto an alumina column (activity I
neutral, 1 cm × 10 cm). The product was eluted with methanol/
tetrahydrofuran/benzene (1:1:10). Upon removal of solvent in Vacuo,
the solid product iron(II) Michael acceptor was obtained (130 mg, 87%).
MS: m/e ) 944.2 (M+) for C56H40N8O4Fe (LSIMS). UV-vis
(toluene): λmax 418, 422 (split Soret), 538 nm.
Four-Nitrogen Aza-crown-Capped Porphyrin Syntheses. The
Michael acceptor (free base or iron(II) derivative) was allowed to react
with cyclen or cyclam aza-crown ethers. The conditions under which
it was performed were identical, with the exception that the free base
reactions were carried out under nitrogen while the syntheses using
the Fe(II)-metalated porphyrin were done in a drybox. In a typical
reaction, Michael acceptor (0.15 mmol) is dissolved in CH3OH/CH2-
Cl2 (25:1, 25 mL) in a 50 mL round bottom flask with a stir bar, an
aza-crown ether (0.75 mmol) added, and the solution heated to reflux.
After 72 h the solution is cooled and the solvent removed in Vacuo.
The resulting solid is dissolved in a minimum amount of CH2Cl2 and
loaded directly onto an alumina column (activity I neutral, 1 cm × 10
cm). The product is eluted with 2% CH3OH/CH2Cl2. Evaporation of
the solvent yields the desired product.
Cyclam-Capped Porphyrin Free Base. Yield: 91%. 1H NMR
(CDCl3): δ 10.1 (s, 4H); 8.95 (d, J ) 8.4 Hz, 4H); 8.81 (s, 4H); 8.78
(s, 4H); 7.77 (t, J ) 7.3 Hz, 4H); 7.49 (d, J ) 6.5 Hz, 4H); 7.30 (t, J
) 7.4 Hz, 4H); 2.18 (br m, 8H); 2.05 (br s, 8H); 0.3 (br s, 8H); -0.2
(br, 4H); -0.5 (br, 4H); -2.2 (br, 2H); -2.5 (br, 2H); -2.76 (s, 2H).
13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 171; 138; 137; 133; 131; 130; 129; 122; 121;
117; 51; 49; 41; 34; 19. MS: m/e ) 1091.5 (M+) for C66H66N12O4
(LSIMS). Anal. Calcd for C66H66N12O4‚CH2Cl2: C, 68.46; N, 14.31;
H, 5.84. Found: C, 68.12; N, 14.02; H, 5.76. UV-vis (toluene): λmax
426 (Soret), 516, 550, 590, 646 nm.
Cyclen-Capped Porphyrin Free Base. Yield: 70%. 1H NMR
(CDCl3): δ 9.55 (s, 4H); 8.88 (d, J ) 8.1 Hz, 4H); 8.83 (s, 8H); 7.87
(d, J ) 7.3 Hz, 4H); 7.83 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 4H); 7.44 (t, J ) 7.3 Hz, 4H);
1.99 (s, br, 8H); 1.77 (s, br, 8H); 1.4-0.0 (br region, 8H); 1.25 (br,
6H) water; -0.5 to -1.5 (br peak, 4H); -2.73 (s, 2H); -3 to -3.6 (br
peak, 4H). MS: m/e ) 1063.6 (M+) for C64H62N12O4 (LSIMS). Anal.
Calcd for C64H62N12O4‚3H2O (water identified in NMR): C, 68.80; N,
15.04; H, 6.15. Found: C, 69.29; N, 15.06; H, 5.79. UV-vis
(toluene): λmax 422 (Soret), 514, 546, 590, 642 nm.
ditional evidence for the plausibility of this hypothesis. The
decreased size of the gas binding cavity in the pocket porphyrins
resulted in M values on the order of 200. Infrared spectral
studies of these compounds were consistent with a CO more
weakly bound than in the case of picket fence porphyrin.
Various X-ray crystallographic studies of CO bound Hb and
Mb purported to observe a steric interaction in the CO bound
proteins. The CO unit is reported to be tipped off axis, relative
to the heme plane normal, from 7° to 47°.10 Recent interpreta-
tion of the available structural data favors a smaller deviation
from the heme plane normal.9d These recently estimated angles
have spawned considerable debate as to whether steric or
electrostatic effects play the greater role in determining the CO
affinity of Hb and Mb. Spiro et al. have suggested that a polar
interaction between the terminal oxygen atom of bound CO and
the lone pair on the distal histidine plays a substantial role in
determining the CO affinity of Mb. They have argued that off-
axis bending of the Fe-CO unit, while drastically reducing the
strength of the Fe-C bond, is energetically very costly to the
protein moiety and hence unlikely.11 In addition Traylor has
demonstrated that the polarity of the environment surrounding
the gas binding pocket has a large effect on the M value of
model complexes. He argued the M value in his studies is
influenced by an increase in O2 affinity with negligible change
in CO affinity.12 The presence of water molecules in the binding
pocket has also been suggested as contributing to the relative
O2 and CO affinities. The effects of water in the distal pocket
have been evaluated in a series of E7 Mb mutants and have
been advanced as the water-displacement model.13 In the
present paper we demonstrate that steric effects alone can
drastically reduce the carbon monoxide affinity of an iron(II)
porphyrin complex and hence its M value.
Experimental Section
Materials and Methods. All oxygen sensitive work was performed
in a N2-filled drybox kept at or below 0.5 ppm O2. All chemicals were
purchased commercially (Aldrich, Acros) and used as received unless
otherwise noted. Solvents were distilled under a nitrogen or argon
atmosphere from the indicated reagents immediately prior to use:
methylene chloride (P2O5); benzene, tetrahydrofuran, and toluene
(sodium/benzophenone ketyl); methanol (Mg). R,R,R,R-Tetrakis(o-
aminophenyl)porphyrin was prepared according to the literature
procedure.14 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were obtained on a Nicolet
WB-300 or a Varian XL-400 spectrometer and referenced to residual
proton solvents. Mass spectra were taken at the University of
California, San Francisco, Mass Spectrometry Facility. UV-vis spectra
were recorded on a Hewlett-Packard 8452A diode array spectrometer.
Elemental analysis was performed by Midwest Microlabs (Indianapolis,
IN).
Synthesis and Characterization. Michael Acceptor. In an inert
atmosphere box, a 500 mL round bottom flask equipped with a stir
(10) (a) Heidner, E. J.; Ledner, R. C.; Perutz, M. F. J. Mol. Biol. 1976,
104, 707. (b) Kuriyan, J.; Wilz, S.; Karplus, M.; Petsko, G. A. J. Mol.
Biol. 1986, 192, 133. (c) Teng, T. -Y.; Srajer, V.; Moffat, K. Nat. Struct.
Biol. 1994, 1, 701. (d) Cheng, X.; Schoenborn, B. P. J. Mol. Biol. 1991,
220, 381. (e) Quillin, M. L.; Arduini, R. M.; Olson, J. S.; Phillips, Jr. J.
Mol. Biol. 1993, 234, 140. (f) Schlichting, I.; Berendzen, J.; Phillips Jr.;
Sweet, R. M. Nature 1994, 371, 808. (g) Ivanov, D.; Sage, J. T.; Keim,
M.; Powel, J. R.; Asher, S. A.; Champion, P. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 4139. (h) Derenenda, Z.; Dodsong.; Elmsley, P.; Harris, D.; Nagai,
K.; Perutz, M. F.; Reanud, J. P. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 211, 515. (i) Lim, M.;
Jackson, T. A.; Anfinrud, P. A. Science 1995, 269, 962.
(11) (a) Ray, G. B.; Li, X.-Y.; Ibers, J. A.; Sessler, J. L.; Spiro, T. G. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 162. (b) Spiro, T. G. Science 1995, 270, 221.
(12) (a) Traylor, T. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 102. (b) Traylor, T.
G.; Koga, N.; Dearduff, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6504.
(13) Springer, B. A.; Sligar, S. G.; Olson, J. S.; Phillips, G. N. Chem.
ReV. 1994, 94, 699.
Three-Nitrogen Aza-crown Porphyrin Capping Synthesis. The
synthesis is identical to that of the four-nitrogen aza-crown porphyrin
capping synthesis described above, except 1.1 equiv of the three-
nitrogen aza-crown was used rather than 6 equiv as in the case of the
four-nitrogen models.
(14) (a) Linsey, I. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 5215. (b) Elliot, C. M. Anal.
Chem. 1980, 52, 666.