7.37–7.33 (6H, b), 7.46 (1H, d, J 2.4, r1), 6.43 (1H, br s, r2), 6.26
(1H, br s, r3), 4.86 (1H, br d, r5), 4.73 (1H, m, r4), 4.64 (1H, dd,
J 12.0, 4.8, r5), 3.21 (3H, s, 2ꢀ), 3.12 (3H, br s, 2ꢀ). dC (150 MHz;
CDCl3) 191.2 (S1), 166.6 (4), 166.2 (a), 165.4 (b), 165.3 (b), 160.9
(1ꢀ), 159.7 (2), 149.9 (9), 144.2 (7), 133.6 (6), 133.4 (b), 130.9 (10),
129.7–128.4 (b), 89.6 (r1), 78.2 (r4), 73.4 (r2), 70.6 (r3), 63.0 (r5),
42.2 (2ꢀ), 36.3 (2ꢀ). MS(FAB) m/z (M + H+), 691.2151.
1-(b-D-Ribofuranosyl)-2-(N,N-diethylaminomethyleneamino)-6-
formylpteridin-4-one (RDEF). BzRDF (69.1 mg, 0.1 mmol) was
allowed to stir in methanol (containing 25% diethylamine, 8 ml)
under nitrogen at room temperature for 24 h. The mixture was
evaporated in vacuo. Then, H2O (10 ml) was added and neutralized
by 0.6 N HCl. The product was isolated by RP-HPLC. The
fraction was evaporated in vacuo and the title compound was
obtained as a yellow solid (19.9 mg, 49%). dH (600 MHz; CDCl3)
10.14 (1H, s, S1), 9.05 (1H, s, 7), 8.90 (1H, s, 1ꢀ), 7.11 (1H, d, J
5.5, r1), 5.04 (1H, t, J 1.5, r2), 4.71 (1H, t, J 6.2, r3), 4.09 (1H, m,
r4), 3.87 (2H, ddd, J 76.6, 12.0, 2.8, r5), 3.71 (2H, ddd, J 6.9, 2ꢀ),
3.55 (2H, ddd, J 6.9, 2ꢀ), 1.37 (3H, t, J 6.9, 3ꢀ), 1.31 (3H, t, J 7.6,
3ꢀ). dC (150 MHz; CDCl3) 190.9 (s1), 166.4 (4), 161.0 (2), 159.8
(1ꢀ), 150.1 (9), 144.1 (7), 143.8 (6), 130.5 (10), 91.6 (r1), 84.7 (r4),
71.4 (r2), 67.0 (r3), 62.4 (r5), 48.1 (2ꢀ), 42.0 (2ꢀ), 14.4 (3ꢀ), 12.4 (3ꢀ).
MS(FAB) m/z (M + H+) 407.1691.
Scheme 3 The numbering of the 6FP nucleoside analogs synthesized in
this study.
30 eV for electron impact (EI) or fast atom bombardment (FAB)
conditions. The reaction in the dark was performed in a vessel
covered completely with foil. The EPR spectra were recorded on
a Model JES-TE300 spectrometer (JEOL Ltd.; Tokyo, Japan).
1-(b-D-Ribofuranosyl)-2-(piperidine-1-ylmethyleneamino)-6-for-
mylpteridin-4-one (RPIF). BzRDF (138.0 mg, 0.2 mmol) was
allowed to stir in methanol (containing 25% piperidine, 10 ml)
under nitrogen at room temperature for 24 h. The mixture was
evaporated in vacuo. Then, H2O (10 ml) was added and neutralized
by 0.6 N HCl. The product was isolated by RP-HPLC. The fraction
was evaporated in vacuo and the title compound was obtained as
a yellow solid (20.9 mg, 25%). dH (600 MHz; CDCl3) 10.11 (1H, s,
S1), 9.05 (1H, s, 7), 8.78 (1H, s, 1ꢀ), 7.06 (1H, d, J 4.8, r1), 5.12
(1H, br, r2), 4.69 (1H, t, J 5.7, r3), 4.09 (1H, m, r4), 3.87 (2H,
ddd, J 74.6, 12.1, 2.5, r5), 3.83 (2H, br d, 2ꢀ), 3.65 (2H, br, 6ꢀ),
1.80 (2H, br, 4ꢀ), 1.78 (2H, br, 5ꢀ), 1.75 (2H, br, 3ꢀ). dC (150 MHz;
CDCl3) 190.9 (s1), 166.3 (4), 161.0 (2), 158.9 (1ꢀ), 150.1 (9), 144.3
(7), 143.7 (6), 130.1 (10), 91.5 (r1), 84.7 (r4), 71.1 (r2), 69.9 (r3),
62.3 (r5), 53.0 (6ꢀ), 45.9 (2ꢀ), 26.5 (4ꢀ), 25.3 (3ꢀ), 23.9 (5ꢀ). MS(FAB)
m/z (M + H+) 419.1664.
Synthesis
2-(N,N -Dimethylaminomethyleneamino)-6-formylpteridin-4-
one (DF). DF was synthesized from 6FP according to the
procedure reported previously.9 6FP (570.0 mg, 3.0 mmol) and
tert-butoxybis(dimethylamino)methane (930 ll, 4.5 mmol) were
mixed in DMF (6 ml) with stirring under nitrogen for 20 min at
◦
60 C. During this time, the suspended solid 6FP dissolved. The
mixture was evaporated in vacuo and the resultant orange-tan oil
was purified by column chromatography, eluting with chloroform–
methanol (90 : 10), to give the title compound as a yellow solid
(700.5 mg, 95%). dH (600 MHz; CDCl3–DMSO-d6 = 4 : 1) 11.89
(1H, br s, NH), 10.17 (1H, s, CHO), 9.24 (1H, s, 7), 9.02 (1H, s,
NCHN), 3.28 (3H, s, CH3), and 3.24 (3H, s, CH3). dC (150 MHz;
CDCl3–DMSO-d6 = 4 : 1) 191.1, 162.0, 160.3, 160.2, 159.1, 148.2,
142.3, 130.9, 41.8, and 35.7. MS(EI) m/z M+, 246.
Oxidation reaction of NADH by RDEF in the dark
1-(2,3,5-Tri-O-benzoyl-b-D-ribofuranosyl)-2-(N,N -dimethyl-
aminomethyleneamino)-6-formylpteridin-4-one
(BzRDF). Tri-
PBS solutions (4 ml, pH 7.4) containing 2 mM RDEF and 2 mM
NADH were prepared. These solutions were kept in the dark
and stirred in an open system at room temperature. The time-
dependent concentration change of each component in the sample
solutions was analyzed by RP-HPLC consisting of a DP-8020
pumping system, a CO-8020 column oven, and a PX-8020 system
controller (TOSOH; Tokyo, Japan): Column, ULTRON VX-ODS,
Shinwa Chemical Industries; (Kyoto, Japan); column and particle
size, 4.6 × 150 mm and 5 lm, respectively; eluent, 10 mM TEAA
buffer (pH 7.0); gradient, CH3CN concentration in the liner
gradient mode (0 min: 0%; 30 min: 50%); flow rate, 1.0 ml min−1;
temperature, 37 ◦C. NAD+ in the RP-HPLC peak was identified
methylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate (1450 ll, 8.9 mmol) was
added slowly with ice cooling to a solution of 1-O-acetyl-
2,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-b-D-ribofuranose (1006.5 mg, 2.24 mmol),
DF (550.2 mg, 2.24 mmol), and DBU (900 ll, 6.0 mmol) in
acetonitrile (10 ml). After stirring under nitrogen at 60 ◦C for
14 h, the mixture was evaporated in vacuo and the resultant
brown oil was purified by column chromatography, eluting with
chloroform–methanol (98 : 2), to give the title compound as a
yellow solid (939.3 mg, 68%). By heteronuclear multiple bond
correlation (HMBC) NMR analysis, it was observed that H at
C(r1) of the ribose ring has correlations with C(2) and C(9) of the
pterin ring. dH (600 MHz; CDCl3) 10.25 (1H, s, S1), 9.08 (1H, s,
7), 9.01 (1H, s, 1ꢀ), 7.97 (4H, b), 7.88 (2H, b), 7.56–7.53 (3H, b),
1
by UV absorption spectra, H- and 13C-NMR analysis, and RP-
HPLC was used for its quantitative analysis.
3318 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2007, 5, 3314–3319
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
©