3306
the loss of diphenylcarbamoyl group from 6 and 7).6b In the coupling of 3 and 12, N-9 isomer 13 might
be either the kinetic product (if the reaction is irreversible) or thermodynamic product (if the reaction is
reversible). In either case, 13 would be isolated as the exclusive product using either dichloroethane or
acetonitrile as solvent.
In summary, we encountered an unexpectedly low N-9/N-7 regioselectivity in the coupling of
Robins’ reagent (2-N-acetyl-6-O-diphenylcarbamoylguanine) with a D-glucosamine derivative and the
N-9:N-7 ratio was also strongly influenced by the solvent used in the glycosylation. 2-N-Acetyl-6-O-
benzylguanine was used successfully as a replacement of Robins’ reagent in the above glycosylation to
give selectively the desired N-9 product in either acetonitrile or dichloroethane in modest yield. Further
studies to probe the underlying cause of the above described solvent effect and investigation of the scope
in the use of 2-N-acetyl-6-O-benzylguanine are currently in progress and will be reported in due course.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Roche Physical Chemistry Department for spectroscopic measurements
and interpretations. Advice and encouragement from Drs. Christopher Exon, Masami Okabe, Ramakanth
Sarabu, Steve Tam and Steve Wolff are gratefully acknowledged.
References
1. Goodnow Jr., R. A.; Richou, A.-R.; Tam, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3195–3198.
2. Goodnow Jr., R. A.; Tam, S.; Pruess, D. L.; McComas, W. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3199–3202.
3. For leading references, see: (a) Robins, M. J.; Zou, R.; Hansske, F.; Madej, D.; Tyrrell. D. L. J. Nucleosides Nucleotides
1989, 8, 725–741. (b) Jenny, T. F.; Benner, S. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6619–6620. (c) Garner, P.; Ramakanth, S. J.
Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 1294–1298.
4. (a) Zou, R.; Robins, M. J. Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 1436–1437. (b) Robins, M. J.; Zou, R.; Guo, Z.; Wnuk, S. F. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 9207–9212.
5. Ref. 3a stated that “our procedure is very sensitive to moisture and has been found to proceed well only in anhydrous
toluene” but it was not further elaborated. Dichloroethane used in our studies was freshly distilled from calcium hydride
under argon.
6. (a) Ref. 3c stated that in glycosylation studies using 2-N-acetylguanine that “a variety of modifications involving solvent
composition, different catalysts, and nucleoside precomplexation were tried but did not increase the proportion of N-9
isomer significantly”. (b) For an example in which coupling with 2-N-acetylguanine gave a higher N-9:N-7 ratio when
a less polar solvent was used, see: Chamberlain, S. D.; Biron, K. K.; Dornsife, R. E.; Averett, D. R.; Beauchamp, L.;
Koszalka, G. W. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1371–1377.
7. We are aware of only two published examples involving persilylated 5 under TMSOTf activation (Robins’ conditions)
which did not use toluene as solvent. (a) Bednarski, K.; Dixit, D. M.; Mansour, T. S.; Colman, S. G.; Walcott, S. M.;
Ashman, C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1995, 5, 1741–1744. Methylene chloride was used as solvent, product yield was
25–30% and only N-9 regioisomers were formed. (b) Sells, T. B.; Nair, V. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 117. Acetonitrile was
used as solvent, yield of N-9 product was 21% and it was not mentioned in the paper if any N-7 regioisomer was formed.
8. For an example involving the use of 5 in which trimethylsilyl perchlorate (TMSClO4) was used as activator and
dichloroethane was used as solvent, see: Herdewijn, P.; Van Aerschot, A.; Busson, R.; Claes, P.; De Clercq, E. Nucleosides
Nucleotides 1991, 10, 1525–1549. The yield of N-9 product was 55% and it was not mentioned in the paper if any N-7
regioisomer was formed.
9. For an example involving the use of 5 in which iodotrimethylsilane (TMSI) was used as activator and dichloroethane was
used as solvent, see: Tse, H. L. A.; Knight, D. J.; Coates, J. A. V.; Mansour, T. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7,
1387–1392. The reaction regioselectively gave the N-9 product in 49% yield.
10. For an example involving the use of 5 in which the yield of N-9 glycosylation product depended strongly on the choice of
solvent (acetonitrile versus dichloroethane; 80% versus 40% yield), see: Janardhanam, S.; Nambiar, K. P. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1994, 1009–1010.