J. S. Clark et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 6187–6190
6189
D
H
O
O
O
H
D
+
+
O
O
O
H
H
D
7b
30
33
8b
16
17
11
N2
H D
Rh2(O2CCH3)4
Rh2(O2CCF3)4
54
50
kH/kD = 1.2
kH/kD = 1.0
O
Rh2L4,
CH2Cl2, rt
O
D
H
H
H
6c
D
H
O
O
O
+
+
O
O
O
H
H
D
9b
10b
12
Rh2(O2CCF3)4
4
39
57
kH/kD = 1.3
Scheme 3.
However, both sets of products could be isolated from
the rhodium(II) trifluoroacetate catalysed reaction. In
this case, the diastereoisomers 7b and 8b were obtained
in a 66:34 ratio and the kinetic isotope effect (11/[7b+
8b]) was 1.0. In contrast, the isomeric anomalous prod-
ucts 9b and 10b were obtained as a 9:91 mixture and
the kinetic isotope effect (12/[9b+10b]) was 1.3.
finding which is indicative of the non-linear transition
state required for intramolecular H-transfer.10
In summary, our results demonstrate that the conven-
tional and anomalous C–H insertion products 5 and 4
are not produced by a common rate-determining step
and that the ionic intermediate 3 is unlikely to be an
intermediate prior to formation of the acetal 4. Further
studies to elucidate the mechanism of the reaction
leading to anomalous C–H insertion products are in
progress.
We also explored the temperature and solvent depen-
dence of the reaction. The ratios of products obtained
from the rhodium(II) trifluoroacetate mediated reaction
in dichloromethane were identical at 0°C, room temper-
ature or reflux.8 When the same reaction was performed
in 1,2-dichloroethane the ratio of products differed
from those obtained in dichloromethane, but there was
little variation in the relative ratios of products within
each reaction manifold between 0 and 83°C.9
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the EPSRC for financial support
(Grant no. GR/L62856).
Several important findings emerge from our results.
Firstly, there is a modest but significant difference
between the kinetic isotope effects for the conventional
and anomalous C–H insertion reactions of diazoketone
6c mediated by rhodium(II) trifluoroacetate. This
finding rules out a common rate determining CꢀH bond
cleavage step for the conventional and anomalous C–H
insertion reactions (Scheme 1). Secondly, the high level
of diastereocontrol (9b:10b, 9:91) obtained from the
anomalous C–H insertion reaction contrasts with the
modest level of diastereocontrol (7b:8b, 66:34) obtained
during the conventional C–H insertion reaction; a simi-
lar though less pronounced effect was observed during
the cyclisation of the diazoketones 6a and 6b. This
result demonstrates that the stereochemistry defining
steps differ in the conventional and anomalous C–H
insertion reactions. It also precludes the intermediacy of
an equilibrating or freely rotating rhodium enolate 3
generated by hydride transfer prior to CꢀC bond for-
mation since this would produce a 1:1 mixture of the
labelled acetals 9 and 10 (Scheme 1). Finally, the kinetic
isotope effects for both C–H insertion reactions are
generally independent of the reaction temperature, a
References
1. Clark, J. S.; Dossetter, A. G.; Russell, C. A.; Whitting-
ham, W. G. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4910.
2. (a) Taber, D. F.; Ruckle, Jr., R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1986, 108, 7686; (b) Doyle, M. P.; Westrum, L. J.;
Wolthuis, W. N. E.; See, M. M.; Boone, W. P.; Bagheri,
V.; Pearson, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 958; (c)
Taber, D. F.; Malcolm, S. C. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
3717.
3. Mander, L. N.; Owen, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
723.
4. The principal author would like to express his sincere
apologies to Professor Mander for an oversight which
meant that this important paper (Ref. 3) was not cited in
our original publication (Ref. 1).
5. White, J. D.; Hrnciar, P. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
7271.
6. Wang, P.; Adams, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
3296.