Paper
Dalton Transactions
37 °C or 45 °C) for 5 min before collecting each spectrum. Foundation under Award Number CHE-01162222. The Bruker
Absorbance values at 287 nm were fitted using a 1 : 1 binding AXS SMART APEXII single crystal diffractometer was acquired
model as described in the ESI.† All the reported apparent through the support of the Molecular Design Institute in the
binding constants represent the average of a minimum of Department of Chemistry at New York University.
three independent titrations.
Spectrophotometric determination of the Zn2+ binding
Notes and references
constant
Analysis of zinc binding was conducted using a Zn2+/EGTA
1 B. Valeur and I. Leray, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2000, 205, 3.
2 In older reports, the acronym APTA is used instead.
3 L. A. Levy, E. Murphy, B. Raju and R. E. London, Biochemis-
try, 1988, 27, 4041.
buffered system, modified from the protocol described by
Fahrni and O’Halloran.34 A solution containing 50 μM APTRA,
1 mM ZnCl2 and 1 mM EGTA in aqueous PIPES buffer was
mixed at various ratios with a solution containing 50 μM
APTRA and 1 mM EGTA in the same aqueous buffer, and
allowed to equilibrate for 10 min at 25 °C before acquiring the
absorption spectrum. The absorbance at 287 nm as a function
of [Zn2+] was analyzed using a simple 1 : 1 binding model. The
free metal ion concentrations in each mixture was calculated
from the total Zn2+ concentration, [Zn2+]t, using an apparent
stability constant for Zn2+–EGTA of log K′ZnEGTA = 8.24 at pH
7.0. This apparent stability constant was calculated from the
absolute binding constant log KZnEGTA = 12.6 (25 °C, μ = 0.1)35
using Schwarzenbach’s α coefficient method, with pKa values
for EGTA corrected by 0.11 units to account for the fact that
tabulated pKa values are determined using concentrations and
not the activity of the hydrogen ion. Further details are pro-
vided in the ESI.†
4 R. E. London, Annu. Rev. Physiol., 1991, 53, 241.
5 For selected examples, see: (a) B. Raju, E. Murphy,
L. A. Levy, R. D. Hall and R. E. London, Am. J. Physiol.: Cell
Physiol., 1989, 256, C540; (b) A. P. de Silva,
H. Q. N. Gunaratne and G. E. M. Maguire, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1994, 1213; (c) E. Cielen, A. Stobiecka,
A. Tahri, G. J. Hoornaert, F. C. De Schryver, J. Gallay,
M. Vincent and N. Boens, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
2002, 1197; (d) H. M. Kim, C. Jung, B. R. Kim, S.-Y. Jung,
J. H. Hong, Y.-G. Ko, K. J. Lee and B. R. Cho, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 3460; (e) J. Tolosa, A. J. Zucchero and
U. H. F. Bunz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 6498;
(f) X. Dong, J. H. Han, C. H. Heo, H. M. Kim, Z. Liu and
B. R. Cho, Anal. Chem., 2012, 84, 8110; (g) M. S. Afzal,
J.-P. Pitteloud and D. Buccella, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50,
11358; (h) G. Zhang, J. J. Gruskos, M. S. Afzal and
D. Buccella, Chem. Sci., 2015, 6, 6841.
Isothermal titration calorimetry
6 The Molecular Probes Handbook: A Guide to Fluorescent
Probes and Labeling Technologies, Life Technologies Corpor-
ation, 2010.
7 B. Metten, M. Smet, N. Boens and W. Dehaen, Synthesis,
2005, 1838.
8 N. Basaric, M. Baruah, W. Qin, B. Metten, M. Smet,
W. Dehaen and N. Boens, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2005, 3,
2755.
Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments were conducted
at 25 °C with a TA Instruments NanoITC LV. Data were ana-
lyzed using NanoAnalyze (v. 3.5.0). Solutions of the metal
(50 mM MgCl2 or 30 mM CaCl2 in 50 mM PIPES, 100 mM KCl
aqueous buffer at pH 7.0; or 3.0 mM ZnCl2 in deionized water)
were titrated into samples of APTRA (3.0 mM for Mg2+ and
Ca2+ titrations, 0.30 mM for Zn2+ titrations) in 50 mM PIPES,
100 mM KCl aqueous buffer at pH 7.0. Heat values were
recorded against a reference cell filled with 350 μL of the same
aqueous PIPES buffer. Blank titrations of the metal into buffer
were subtracted from the APTRA titration data to correct for
the effects of metal dilution. The heats of metal buffer inter-
actions were determined36 and used to correct the heat of
metal–APTRA binding. Additional titrations were conducted to
account for the heats of ligand dilution and buffer dilution;
these were found to be negligible with respect to heat values
arising from the metal–ligand interaction and were, therefore,
neglected. Buffer protonation effects were neglected.
9 A 15N-labeled APTRA chelator was recently reported for the
low-affinity detection of Ca2+ by hyperpolarized NMR tech-
niques. See: R. Hata, H. Nonaka, Y. Takakusagi,
K. Ichikawa and S. Sando, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51,
12290.
10 T. J. B. Simons, J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods, 1993, 27,
25.
11 S. L. Sensi, L. M. T. Canzoniero, S. P. Yu, H. S. Ying,
J.-Y. Koh, G. A. Kerchner and D. W. Choi, J. Neurosci., 1997,
17, 9554.
12 C. Cheng and I. J. Reynolds, J. Neurochem., 1998, 71, 2401.
13 Sensitivity of the indicator refers to the change in optical
signal per unit change of the metal concentration being
measured.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the National Science Foun- 14 R. A. Colvin, W. R. Holmes, C. P. Fontaine and W. Maret,
dation (CHE-1555116). The authors acknowledge Tal Moriah Metallomics, 2010, 2, 306.
for her assistance in acquiring spectrophotometric data. The 15 W. Maret, Metallomics, 2015, 7, 202.
Bruker Avance-400 and Avance-500 NMR spectrometers were 16 R. D. Grubbs, Biometals, 2002, 15, 251.
acquired through the support of the National Science 17 A. M. P. Romani, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2011, 512, 1.
Dalton Trans.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016