sodium chlorodifluoroacetate) for the preparation of the
previously unknown compound 1,3-difluoro-2,4-di-n-propyl-
benzene (2) from the appropriate 1,2-disubstituted cyclo-
butenes.
Table 1. Yields of 1,3-Difluoroaromatics
yield
entry
source of carbene
1
2
Preparation of 1,2-diphenylcyclobutene (3) was accom-
plished in four steps (39% overall yield) from diphenyl-
acetylene adapting the method of Negishi for preparing
cyclobutenes. The synthesis of 1,2-di-n-propylcyclobutene
(4) was also accomplished in four steps from 4-octyne
following exactly the procedure of Negishi (Scheme 1).10
1
2
Ph-Hg-CF3/NaI/benzene reflux/48 h
NaCClF2CO2/diglyme reflux/60 min
77a
53
60
41
a Reference 8.
with no significant changes observed in upfield signals. The
19F NMR spectrum has features similar to the proton
spectrum: a quartet-like multiplet centered at δ -120.35 and
a triplet-like multiplet at δ -121.43 (relative to CFCl3 at δ
0.00).
Scheme 1a
The most compelling evidence for the structure of 2 comes
from the proton-decoupled 13C NMR spectrum in conjunction
with a DEPT 135 experiment. The two aromatic carbons with
protons attached (δ 127.5 and 110.1), as shown by the DEPT
experiment, are both split into doublets of doublets. The
resonance at δ 127.5 (Cc) shows nearly equal coupling (JCF
) 9.71 and 7.07 Hz) to the two fluorines, indicating it is
meta to both fluorines. The other protonated aromatic carbon
a Reaction conditions: (a) 2EtMgBr/THF/-78 °C; (b) diphenyl-
acetylene or 4-octyne/THF/0 °C; (c) I2/THF/-78 °C. (d) BuLi/
THF/-78 °C.
Compound 4 was then reacted with Ph-Hg-CF3 in refluxing
benzene11 to produce the new compound 2 in 60% yield.
Following this, compounds 3 and 4 were individually
subjected to sodium chlorodifluoroacetate in refluxing di-
glyme (Scheme 2).12 This resulted in the formation of 1 and
2 in 53 and 41% yields, respectively (Table 1).
(Cd) has coupling constants to the two fluorines of JCF
)
22.43 Hz and JCF ) 3.71 Hz. The magnitude of these
coupling constants indicates that this carbon is ortho to one
fluorine and para to the other.13
Similar C-F coupling constant arguments can be made
for the doublets of doublets at δ 124.7 (Cb) and 117.4 (Cf),
which are the carbons holding the propyl groups. The carbon
atoms bonded to the fluorines appear as doublets of doublets
centered at δ 159.8 (JCF ) 243.17 Hz, JCF ) 8.83 Hz) and
δ 159.5 (JCF ) 244.94 Hz, JCF ) 8.83 Hz). The magnitude
of the smaller C-F coupling constant in these carbon
resonances clearly indicates that the two fluorine atoms are
meta to one another.13 Taken together, these data firmly
establish the structure of the previously unknown compound
2.
Scheme 2a
Spectral data collected (1H, 13C, and 19F NMR and GCMS)
of compounds 1 and 2 made from the acetate salt match those
of the compounds made with Ph-Hg-CF3. Attempts to find
an effective but lower boiling solvent for the reaction with
the acetate salt included 1,4-dioxane (bp ) 102 °C), ethylene
glycol diethyl ether (bp ) 121 °C), and dibutyl ether (bp )
142 °C). All of these solvents were regrettably unsuccessful
at initiating the reaction that produces 1,3-difluoroaromatics.
The mechanism originally proposed for this reaction
involved cationic intermediates that did not require any
assistance from the mercury atom of Ph-Hg-CF3.8 The use
of sodium chlorodifluoroacetate to produce 1,3-difluoro-
aromatics clearly indicates that mercury is not involved in
the mechanism that produces these compounds (Figure 1).
While the organomercury compound (Ph-Hg-CF3) was
the first reagent used to produce 1,3-difluoroaromatics in one
step from cyclobutenes, its use has significant drawbacks
a Reaction conditions: (a) Ph-Hg-CF3 or NaCClF2CO2.
The molecular formula of 2 (produced from Ph-Hg-CF3)
was established by high-resolution mass spectrometry (calcd
1
for C12H16F2, 198.1220; found, 198.1225). The H NMR
spectrum indicated the presence of two inequivalent propyl
groups, showing that 2 has no symmetry. This was most
easily detected by the signals for the two benzyl methylenes
[δ 2.65 (t, J ) 7.95 Hz, 2H) and δ 2.58 (t, J ) 7.65 Hz,
2H)]. The other notable feature of the proton spectrum
involved the two aromatic resonances. These appeared as a
quartet-like multiplet centered at δ 6.94 and a triplet-like
multiplet at δ 6.74. A 19F-decoupled 1H spectrum simplified
these two proton signals to a set of doublets (J ) 8.4 Hz),
(10) Negishi, E.; Liu, F.; Choueiry, D.; Mohamud, M. M.; Silveria, A.;
Reeves, M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8325.
(11) Seyferth, D.; Hopper, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 4070.
(12) Csuk, R.; Eversmann, L. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 6445.
(13) Kalinowski, H.-O.; Berger, S.; Braun, S. Carbon-13 NMR Spec-
troscopy; Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK, 1984; pp 581-585.
3872
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 22, 2002