Inorganic Chemistry
Article
800 nm.36,44 Experimental details of the UV−vis SEC studies
At an applied potential corresponding to the first reduction,
a new absorption band at 521 nm appears in the UV−vis
spectra of both 1-Re and 2-Re (Figure 6). This absorption is
work (Figure 4). Catalysts 1-Re, 2-Re, and ReBpy show
crossing of the forward and return sweeps under CO2
atmosphere, indicating that adsorption to the electrode surface
or depletion of the substrate in the diffusion layer of the
electrode may be taking place.53,54 In general, the amino-
phenyl-substituted catalysts exhibit higher catalytic currents
relative to ReBpy. At a scan rate of 100 mV s−1, 1-Re, 2-Re, 3-
Re, and ReBpy show 8.8-, 11.0-, 6.6-, and 4.4-fold current
enhancements as measured by the ratio of the catalytic current
(icat) relative to the reductive peak current observed in the
absence of substrate (ip). Complex 2-Re shows the largest icat/
ip value from the series with a catalytic half-wave potential
(Ecat/2) that is 50 mV more positive than that of ReBpy and
100 mV more positive than those of 1-Re and 3-Re.
Importantly, this indicates that the catalytic activity in this
series depends on factors other than mere catalytic over-
potentials, since 3-Re would be expected to be the most active
catalyst of the series on the basis of thermodynamic driving
force for CO2 reduction.
Figure 6. UV−vis SEC reduction of 1-Re (left) and 2-Re (right)
under N2. The assigned species are color-coded as follows: pristine
complexes (black); one-electron-reduced species (red); two-electron-
reduced species (blue).
The ratio of the catalytic current (icat) and corresponding
reductive peak current in the absence of a substrate (ip) serves
as a useful gauge to compare the activity of different catalysts.
According to the following electroanalytical equations (eqs 2
and 3), the catalytic rate constant (kcat) and turnover frequency
(TOF) are proportional to (icat/ip)2 under steady-state
conditions (where np is 1, the number of electrons transferred
in the noncatalytic reduction, and ncat is 2 for CO2 reduction to
CO, the number of electrons transferred in the catalytic
reaction).54
assigned to the one-electron-reduced species, consistent with
previous reports on related compounds.36,42,51 Holding the
potential at the second reduction gives rise to a new absorption
feature with a λmax value of 560 nm for 1-Re and 566 nm for 2-
Re, which are comparable to previously reported two-electron-
reduced rhenium bipyridyl complexes.26,36,42 Notably, the
characteristic absorption band for the Re−Re dimer is absent
in the spectra of both complexes.
In previous studies, the Re0−Re0 dimer was also not
observed during IR-SEC experiments with ReBpy in
CH3CN.48 It was proposed that [Re(bpy)(CO)3]• reacts too
quickly with the coordinating solvent for dimerization to
occur.39,48 It has also been shown spectroscopically that
substitution with bulky tert-butyl groups at the 4 and 4′
positons of ReBpy slows down or prevents dimerization.18,44
We reason that substitution at the 6 position of bipyridine will
have a similar effect. Finally, the SEC and cyclic voltammetry
experiments operate on different time scales.23,48 This may be
a contributing factor behind the absence of dimer in the SEC
studies.
Electrochemical Studies under CO2. Following the
studies under an inert atmosphere, cyclic voltammetry was
performed in CO2-saturated anhydrous CH3CN solutions to
assess the catalytic activity of 1-Re, 2-Re, and 3-Re for CO2
reduction. The first redox event for all three complexes remains
largely unchanged in the presence of substrate. Scanning
toward more negative potentials gives rise to catalytic waves
near the second reduction process (Figure 4). This behavior is
comparable to that of ReBpy. From the IR-SEC results, 2-Re is
expected to form a small amount of reactive intermediate for
CO2 binding and reduction at the first reduction potential,
which would allow catalysis to occur at a lower overpotential.
Although this was not observed in CVs conducted at higher
scan rates, the catalytic current does initiate at the first
reduction of 2-Re at slow scan rates (Figure S20). This
behavior is not as prominent with the other complexes studied
here, particularly 3-Re and ReBpy. We note that similar results
were obtained with ruthenium polypyridyl complexes by ligand
modification, which altered the catalytic cycle and enabled
catalysis at a lower overpotential.52
kobs = kcat[CO2]
(2)
2
2
3
i
y
z
z
z
z
z
z
Fvnp i
y
z
z
z
z
z
ji
0.4463
j
cat
j
j
j
j
j
j
TOF = kobs
=
j
j
j
RT
k
n
ip
cat
{
(3)
k
{
Cyclic voltammetry as a function of the scan rate was
performed in N2- and CO2-saturated solutions (Figure S21).
From these data, icat/ip values were obtained at each scan rate
and TOFs were calculated using eq 3, which are plotted versus
the scan rate in Figure S22. Although “S-shaped” catalytic
waves were not observed with these systems, scan-rate-
independent TOF values were obtained and are reported to
allow a comparison to literature values. The estimated TOFs
determined are 31.7, 98.8, 30.1, and 14.6 s−1 for 1-Re, 2-Re, 3-
Re, and ReBpy, respectively.
Deviations from ideal “S-shaped” catalytic waves in the CVs
of these catalysts prompted us to apply foot-of-the-wave
analysis (FOWA; eq 4). From this electroanalytical expression,
kcat can be determined and used to find the maximum TOF
(TOFmax) under saturation conditions using eq 5.55 In this
method, the onset of the catalytic wave is analyzed in lieu of
the peak catalytic current to avoid nonideal behavior, such as
substrate depletion and catalyst deactivation, in calculating the
rate of catalysis. The catalytic rate constant (kcat) was
determined from the linear portions of the slopes of plots of
i/ip versus 1/[1 + exp{(F/RT)(E − Ecat)}], where Ecat is the
reduction potential of the catalyst associated with catalysis.
The plots are shown in Figure S23, and the maximum TOFs
obtained by FOWA are 45.5, 127, 58.8, and 21.2 s−1 for 1-Re,
2-Re, 3-Re, and ReBpy, respectively. Table 5 contains Ecat/2
,
icat/ip, and TOF values determined using both methods for all
four catalysts. Noticeably, the TOF values determined by the
two methods are comparable and display the same trend. In
The overpotentials and catalytic current increases are
considerably different for all four catalysts investigated in this
F
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX