10.1002/anie.201806976
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
peroxisomes to the cell center (Figure 3B: S*T 9', Figure 3D-E,
Movie S3). This bidirectional peroxisome transport was readily
visualized within a subcellular region. Upon PA, dispersed
peroxisome vesicles moved to the cell periphery, where they
formed a cluster. Addition of S*T triggered the retrograde
transport of peroxisomes toward the cell body (Figure 3F, Figure
S11, Movie S4). Finally, TMP dissociated BicD2N from
peroxisomes (cyan channels of Figure 3B: TMP 80" TMP 3',
Figure 3D) and disrupted the directional movement of
peroxisomes (red channels of Figure 3B: TMP 80"TMP 3',
Figure 3E). By swapping KIF5BN and BicD2N, BicD2N was first
recruited to cargos to induce retrograde motility, followed by
replacing BicD2N with KIF5BN to trigger anterograde transport
(Figure S12, Movie S5). Hence, the “competitive MAC” approach
can be flexibly implemented to control the direction of cargo
transport.
Acknowledgements
We thank Sven Müller for technical support in microscopy. This
work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft,
DFG (grant No.: SPP 1623), Behrens Weise Stiftung, European
Research Council, ERC (ChemBioAP) and Knut and Alice
Wallenberg Foundation to Y.W.W.
Keywords: chemo-optogenetics • MAC • pdCID • Rac1 •
bidirectional cargo transport
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
G. S. Butler, C. M. Overall, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 935-948.
C. J. Jeffery, Mol. Biosyst. 2009, 5, 345-350.
B. T. MacDonald, K. Tamai, X. He, Dev. Cell 2009, 17, 9-26.
M. C. Hung, W. Link, J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124, 3381-3392.
a) P. van Bergeijk, C. C. Hoogenraad, L. C. Kapitein, Trends Cell Biol.
2016, 26, 121-134; b) P. van Bergeijk, M. Adrian, C. C. Hoogenraad, L.
C. Kapitein, Nature 2015, 518, 111-114.
Most cargos simultaneously bind to kinesin and cytoplasmic
dynein motors, which move in opposite directions along
microtubules. A model of a stochastic “tug-of-war” that describes
the mechanical competition between antagonistic motors bound
to the same cargo has been proposed.[15] Small changes in the
number of active motors lead to significant changes in the net
direction of cargo motility.[16] In our study, the extra force
generated by the recruitment of additional kinesin or dynein
motors outcompetes the force generated by the endogenous
motors, thereby enforcing cargo transport toward the cell
periphery or toward the cell center (Figure S13). Our “competitive
MAC” experiments provide direct experimental support for the
“tug-of-war” model, regardless how exactly dynein and kinesin
motors coordinate with each other at the molecular level.
[6]
[7]
a) W. O. Hancock, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 615-628; b) K. J.
De Vos, A. J. Grierson, S. Ackerley, C. C. Miller, Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
2008, 31, 151-173.
a) A. Fegan, B. White, J. C. T. Carlson, C. R. Wagner, Chem. Rev. 2010,
110, 3315-3336; b) S. Voss, L. Klewer, Y. W. Wu, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2015, 28, 194-201; c) R. DeRose, T. Miyamoto, T. Inoue, Pflug. Arch.
Eur. J. Phy. 2013, 465, 409-417; d) M. Putyrski, C. Schultz, FEBS Lett.
2012, 586, 2097-2105.
[8]
[9]
a) D. Tischer, O. D. Weiner, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 551-558;
b) M. Weitzman, K. M. Hahn, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2014, 30, 112-120; c)
X. Chen, Y. W. Wu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 6796-6799; Angew.
Chem. 2018, 130, 6912-6915; d) N. Ankenbruck, T. Courtney, Y. Naro,
A. Deiters, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 2768-2798; Angew. Chem.
2018, 130, 2816-2848.
a) R. Villasenor, Y. Kalaidzidis, M. Zerial, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2016, 39,
53-60; b) M. Schmick, N. Vartak, B. Papke, M. Kovacevic, D. C. Truxius,
L. Rossmannek, P. I. H. Bastiaens, Cell 2014, 157, 459-471; c) C. Niehrs,
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 767-779.
In this study, we have shown that the pdCID system can be
flexibly implemented in distinct perturbation strategies to achieve
multi-layered activity control in a single cell. Another advantage of
the pdCID system is its selectivity and full bioorthogonality.
NvocTMP-Cl and ST enable the combination of rapid, light-
induced (typically t1/2 < 1 s) and chemically induced (t1/2 < 1 min)
dimerization, respectively. Simultaneous combination of all these
desirable features has not been achieved in other CID systems.
[10] P. Liu, A. Calderon, G. Konstantinidis, J. Hou, S. Voss, X. Chen, F. Li, S.
Banerjee, J. E. Hoffmann, C. Theiss, L. Dehmelt, Y. W. Wu, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 10049-10055; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 10213
-10219.
[11] X. Chen, M. Venkatachalapathy, D. Kamps, S. Weigel, R. Kumar, M.
Orlich, R. Garrecht, M. Hirtz, C. M. Niemeyer, Y.-W. Wu, L. Dehmelt,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 5196-5920; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129,
6010-6014.
In summary, using the pdCID system, we developed a multi-
directional activity control (termed “MAC”) strategy. The “parallel
MAC” approach was used to address the inherent problem of
undesirable background activity in chemical/optogenetic systems
through fine-tuning of the cytosolic level of Rac1. The “competitive
MAC” approach enables reversible, and multiple layers of
functional control, which is exemplified by multi-directional control
of the positioning of organelles and proteins in a single cell. We
envision that these versatile MAC strategies open up new
avenues for spatiotemporal control of proteins or organelles,
which cannot be addressed with existing techniques. These new
tools are particularly useful to study how protein or organelle
function is modulated by their local, subcellular environment, and,
conversely, how proteins or organelles reciprocally affect their
local environment and eventually cellular function. The MAC
approach could also be used to emulate or interfere with disease
conditions involving protein/organelle positioning in order to study
pathogenic mechanisms, and ultimately aid the development of
their therapeutic intervention.
[12] S. C. Phua, C. Pohlmeyer, T. Inoue, ACS Chem. Biol. 2012, 7, 1950-
1955.
[13] Y. I. Wu, D. Frey, O. I. Lungu, A. Jaehrig, I. Schlichting, B. Kuhlman, K.
M. Hahn, Nature 2009, 461, 104-108.
[14] I. Navarro-Lerida, T. Pellinen, S. A. Sanchez, M. C. Guadamillas, Y. H.
Wang, T. Mirtti, E. Calvo, M. A. Del Pozo, Dev. Cell 2015, 32, 318-334.
[15] M. J. I. Müller, S. Klumpp, R. Lipowsky, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008,
105, 4609-4614.
[16] A. G. Hendricks, E. Perlson, J. L. Ross, H. W. Schroeder, 3rd, M. Tokito,
E. L. Holzbaur, Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 697-702.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.