and Skone have used 1-methylpyrrolidine in place of Me3N.8
However, 1-methylpyrrolidine is relatively volatile (bp 80-
81 °C), and only one example involving its use is reported.8
Jones and co-workers have developed a protocol that does
not utilize Me3N.9 This method, though very useful, utilizes
sodium alkoxides which would be incompatible with silyl
protecting groups. The Mitsunobu reaction offers entry to
O6-alkyl dG derivatives devoid of N2 protection,10 and the
conditions are compatible with silyl protecting groups.4,11
However, in many cases separation of products from residual
reactants and byproducts is cumbersome. There are fewer
routes to O6-aryl dG derivatives. The methods of Jones9 and
Reese12 for the preparation of some of these compounds
provide the N2-acylated products. We therefore became
interested in developing a procedure that (a) was operation-
ally simple, (b) provided 3′,5′-O-disilyl nucleoside products
devoid of N2 protection, (c) obviated the use of Me3N, (d)
did not require the reactant to be the reaction medium, and,
importantly, (e) could be utilized to prepare a variety of
compounds from a single precursor.
Scheme 1
Recently, displacement of chloride from the C-6 position
of purines by 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) has
been demonstrated.13,14 Although O6-alkyl purines have been
prepared from the ammonium salts with alkoxides, no
applications of this method for the preparation of O6-alkyl
nucleosides have been reported.14 For our studies the C-6
chloro derivative was not optimal due to the low-yielding
(15%) chlorination of dG.2 On the other hand, the easily
prepared 3′,5′-bis-O-TBDMS O6-mesitylenesulfonate of dG7
(2) appeared to be a much better starting point. However, at
the outset of our experimentation we could not be certain
that DABCO would efficiently displace the mesitylene-
sulfonate (Mes) from the purine.
To test this critical step, we exposed 2 to DABCO in 1,2-
dimethoxyethane (1,2-DME) at rt (Scheme 1). Much to our
delight, immediate progress of the reaction was observed by
TLC with the formation of a very polar, fluorescent spot.
Within 45 min a precipitate, presumably salt 3, began
forming. Complete conversion of 2 to 3 required 13 h, but
as described herein, it is not necessary to isolate 3 prior to
the displacement step.
Preparation of the O6-Alkyl and -Aryl Ethers of dG.15
Synthesis of the O6-alkyl or -aryl ethers (2 f 4) can be
conveniently achieved as a two-step, one-pot reaction. To a
solution of 2 in 1,2-DME (0.1 M) were added 4 Å molecular
sieves (∼320 mg/mmol), the 1° alcohol16 or phenol (5 molar
equiv),17 DABCO (2 molar equiv), and DBU (1.5 molar
equiv). Reactions are normally complete within 24 h at rt.
Upon completion, the reaction mixtures were diluted with
EtOAc (reactions with alcohols) or Et2O (reactions with
phenols). Reaction mixtures with alcohols were extracted
with H2O, while those with phenols were initially extracted
with 1 N NaOH to accomplish removal of excess (potentially
recoverable) phenol, followed by H2O extraction. When
water-immiscible alcohols were used, excess alcohol was
(15) To a solution of 2 (0.074-0.15 mmol) in 1,2-DME were added
DABCO, 4 Å molecular sieves, and the alcohol or phenol. After allowing
the mixture to stir at room temperature for 30 min DBU was added. The
mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 24 h and then diluted
with either EtOAc (for reactions with alcohols) or Et2O (for reactions with
phenols). These mixtures were subjected either to aqueous extraction
(reactions involving alcohols) or to sequential extractions with 1 N NaOH
and H2O (reactions involving phenols). The organic layer in each case was
dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated. The crude products were chromato-
graphed on silica gel using appropriate solvent systems.
(8) Reese, C. B.; Skone, P. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984,
1263-1271.
(9) Fathi, R.; Goswami, B.; Kung, P.-P.; Gaffney, B. L.; Jones, R. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 319-322.
(10) (a) Trichtinger, T.; Charubala, R.; Pfleiderer, W. Tetrahedron Lett.
1983, 24, 711-714. (b) Schulz, B. S.; Pfleiderer, W. Tetrahedron Lett.
1985, 26, 5421-5424.
(16) This reaction provides good yields with 1° alcohols. With a 2°
alcohol (2-propanol) although the desired O6-isopropyl ether was obtained,
the yield was ∼15%. O6-Isopropyl-3′,5′-bis-O-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-2′-
deoxyguanosine: clear oil, Rf(silica/CH2Cl2) ) 0.75. 1H NMR (deacidified
CDCl3): 7.80 (s, 1H8), 6.23 (t, 1H1′, J ) 6.4), 5.46 (sept, 1H, OCH, J )
6.2), 4.71 (s, 2H, NH2), 4.51 (m, 1H3′), 3.87 (app q, 1H4′, Japp ) 3.3), 3.74
(dd, H5′, J ) 4.3, 11.1), 3.65 (dd, 1H5′, J ) 3.2, 11.1), 2.46 (app quint,
1H2′, Japp ) 6.1), 2.24 (ddd, 1H2′, J ) 3.6, 6.0, 13.1), 1.32 (d, 6H, CH3, J
) 6.2), 0.82, 0.81 (2s, 18H, t-Bu), 0.04-0.01 (3s, 12H, SiCH3). HRMS
calcd for C25H48N5O4Si2 (M+ + 1) 538.3245, found 538.3242.
(11) (a) Edwards, C.; Boche, G.; Steinbrecher, T.; Scheer, S. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 1887-1893. (b) Steinbrecher, T.; Wameling,
C.; Oesch, F.; Seidel. A. In Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds: Synthesis,
Properties, Analytical Measurements, Occurrence and Biological Effects;
Garrigues, P., Lamotte, M., Eds.; Gordon and Breach Science Publishers:
Langhorne, PA, 1993; pp 223-230.
(12) Jones, S. S.; Reese, C. B.; Sibanda, S.; Ubasawa, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1981, 22, 4755-4758.
(13) Linn, J. A.; McLean, E. W.; Kelley, J. L. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1994, 913-914.
(17) In the reaction involving EtOH, 10 molar equiv of the alcohol was
used. The lower yield of 4b compared to the other O6-alkyl ethers may be
due to competing elimination by deprotonation at the methyl group in 4b.
(14) Lembicz, N. K.; Grant, S.; Clegg, W.; Griffin, R. J.; Heath, S. L.;
Golding, B. T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 185-186.
928
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 7, 2000