Communication
ChemComm
of NMR chemosensing to 10 mM on non-cryogenic probes. The use
of charged nanoparticles in the analysis of complex matrixes like
urine and biofluids might not yet be straightforward, as many
analytes can be detected at once because of the untargeted nature
of the interaction involved in the recognition process.22,23 None-
theless, the modularity of the proposed method allows an easy
modification and fine-tuning of the sensing systems.
This work was partially supported by P-DiSC#09BIRD2017-
`
UNIPD and P-DiSC#07BIRD2020-UNIPD granted by Universita
degli Studi di Padova and by PRIN 2015 RNWJAM granted by
MIUR. F.M. and D.R.-G. thank the Italian Association for
Cancer Research (AIRC) for financial support (IG ‘‘25003’’).
Fig. 6 (a) 1H-NMR spectrum of a mixture of dopamine (6), homovanillic
acid (4), L-phenylalanine (5) and L-serine (7) all 20 mM in H2O : D2O = 90 : 10
with phosphate buffer (500 mM, pH = 7); (b-c) HP wSTD spectra (4k scans,
4 h of acquisition time) performed on samples similar to that presented in
(a) but in which the concentration of only the binding candidate was
lowered down to 10 mM (dopamine for (b) and homovanillic acid for (c)).
Both HP wSTD experiments were performed in the presence of the
nanoconjugates (1-AuNPs@LUDOXs CL in (b) and 2-AuNPs@LUDOXs
HS in (c)). In both HP wSTD experiments, the AuNPs concentration was 20
mM in coating thiols. A figure showing the entire NMR sweep is reported in
Section S7 of the ESI.†
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Notes and references
1 W. M. Niessen and A. Tinke, J. Chromatogr. A, 1995, 703, 37–57.
2 C. S. Johnson, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 1999, 34, 203–256.
3 M. Nilsson and G. A. Morris, Chem. Commun., 2007, 933–935.
4 J. Reuben, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 1973, 9, 3–70.
5 B. Perrone, S. Springhetti, F. Ramadori, F. Rastrelli and F. Mancin,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 11768–11771.
6 N. K. J. Hermkens, N. Eshuis, B. J. A. Van Weerdenburg, M. C. Feiters,
F. P. J. T. Rutjes, S. S. Wijmenga and M. Tessari, Anal. Chem., 2016, 88,
3406–3412.
7 A. Chen and M. J. Shapiro, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 10258–10259.
8 M. Mayer and B. Meyer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 1784–1788.
9 M. V. Salvia, G. Salassa, F. Rastrelli and F. Mancin, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2015, 137, 11399–11406.
was confirmed by the absence of L-phenylalanine signals in
Fig. 5e. Fig. 5 also puts in evidence an additional advantage of
the approach proposed here, which is the suppression of
residual AuNPs signals in the HP wSTD spectra due to the
enhanced transverse relaxation.
Comforted by the retained selectivity of the AuNPs upon 10 L. Gabrielli, D. Rosa-Gastaldo, M. V. Salvia, S. Springhetti,
F. Rastrelli and F. Mancin, Chem. Sci., 2018, 9, 4777–4784.
11 M. V. Salvia, F. Ramadori, S. Springhetti, M. Diez-Castellnou,
their interaction with the silica nanoparticles, as well as by the
improved sensitivity delivered by the nanoconjugates, we repeated
B. Perrone, F. Rastrelli and F. Mancin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015,
the HP wSTD experiments on two separate mixtures in which the
targets were present at 10 mM concentration, while other three
interfering molecules were present at 20 mM concentration.
Both mixtures were composed by dopamine (6, target of the
1-AuNPs@LUDOXs CL nanoconjugates), homovanillic acid
(4, target of the 2-AuNPs-LUDOXs HS nanoconjugates), L-phenyl-
alanine (5) and L-serine (7). Results are presented in Fig. 6, where
only the aromatic portion of the spectra is reported. Both types of
nanoconjugates continued to retain their selectivity towards the
137, 886–892.
12 F. De Biasi, D. Rosa-Gastaldo, X. Sun, F. Mancin and F. Rastrelli,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 4870–4877.
13 X. Sun, L. Riccardi, F. De Biasi, F. Rastrelli, M. De Vivo and
F. Mancin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 7702–7707.
14 D. Neuhaus and M. P. Williamson, The Nuclear Overhauser Effect in
Structural and Conformational Analysis, Wiley-VCH, 2nd edn, 2000.
15 M. Lucarini, P. Franchi, G. F. Pedulli, C. Gentilini, S. Polizzi,
P. Pengo, P. Scrimin and L. Pasquato, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005,
127, 16384–16385.
16 L. Riccardi, L. Gabrielli, X. Sun, F. De Biasi, F. Rastrelli, F. Mancin
and M. De Vivo, Chem, 2017, 3, 92–109.
respective binding candidate also in the presence of many inter- 17 E. Bourgeat-Lami, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2002, 2, 1–24.
18 S. Barco, I. Gennai, G. Reggiardo, B. Galleni, L. Barbagallo, A. Maffia,
ferent molecules at higher concentrations. Notably, Fig. 6 also
demonstrates how it is possible to analyse the same sample with
E. Viscardi, F. De Leonardis, V. Cecinati, S. Sorrentino, A. Garaventa,
M. Conte and G. Cangemi, Clin. Biochem., 2014, 47, 848–852.
different nanoparticles to detect different target analytes.
19 V. Strenger, R. Kerbl, H. J. Dornbusch, R. Ladenstein, P. F. Ambros,
I. M. Ambros and C. Urban, Pediatr. Blood Cancer, 2007, 48, 504–509.
20 D. F. Davidson, Ann. Clin. Biochem., 2005, 42, 200–207.
21 B. Cutting, S. V. Shelke, Z. Dragic, B. Wagner, H. Gathje, S. Keim and
B. Ernst, Magn. Reson. Chem., 2007, 45, 720–724.
22 B. Zhang, M. Xie, L. Bruschweiler-Li, K. Bingol and R. Bru¨schweiler,
Anal. Chem., 2015, 87, 7211–7217.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that self-organized
nanoconjugates prepared by assembling small AuNPs on the
surface of larger silica nanoparticles allowed to obtain nano-
receptors that retain the recognition properties of small mono-
layer protected nanoparticles while increasing their magnetization
transfer ability. This approach allowed to further decrease the LOD
23 M. Xie, A. L. Hansen, J. Yuan and R. Bru¨schweiler, J. Phys. Chem. C,
2016, 120, 24463–24468.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Chem. Commun., 2021, 57, 3002–3005 | 3005