Footnotes and References
* E-mail: m.r.bryce@durham.ac.uk
† The analysis and reactivity of this material were unchanged by storage in
a sealed container on the bench for at least three months.
‡ Satisfactory elemental analysis were obtained for 7, 9, 10 and 12. Selected
data for 9: mp 215–217 °C; dH (CDCl3) 3.86 (6 H, s); dC (CDCl3) 53.72,
125.30, 136.15, 163.12 and 216.32; m/z (CI) 435 (80Se, 25%), 58 (100);
nmax (KBr)/cm21 1723, 1703, 1574, 1248 and 1049. For 12: mp > 250 °C;
dH ([2H6]DMSO) 3.56 (4 H, t, J 7.8), 3.66 (6 H, s), 7.55 (12 H, m) and 7.69
(8 H, m); nmax (KBr)/cm21 1721, 1566, 1434 and 1242.
S(2)
C(2)
Se(2)
C(4)
Se(1)
C(3)
P(2)
P(1)
§ Crystal data for 12: C34H30NiO4P2S2Se2·C2H3N, M = 886.3, T = 150 K,
monoclinic, space group C2/c (no. 15), a = 41.722(2), b = 9.199(1),
c = 19.599(1) Å, b = 104.17(1)°, V = 7293(1) Å3, Z = 8, Dx = 1.61
C(1)
Ni
S(1)
g cm23, graphite-monochromated Mo-Ka radiation, l
= 0.71073 Å,
m = 27.7 cm21, crystal size 0.50 3 0.35 3 0.24 mm, 44429 reflections
(10294 unique) with q < 61.5° measured using a Siemens SMART CCD
area detector; Rint = 0.078 before, 0.047 after face-indexing (integration)
absorption correction (Tmin,max = 0.310, 0.573), full-matrix least-squares
refinement using SHELXTL software, on F2 of all data to wR = 0.067
(non-H atoms anisotropic, H isotropic; MeCN molecule disordered over
two positions with occupancies of 78.3 and 21.7(5)%; total of 562
variables); for 9030 observed data with I > 2s(I), R(F) = 0.026; residual
Drmin,max = 0.51, 20.47 e Å23. CCDC 182/635.
Fig. 1 Molecular structure of 12. Bond distances (Å): Ni–S(1) 2.168(1), Ni–
S(2) 2.173(1), Ni–P(1) 2.175(1), Ni–P(2) 2.191(1), S(1)–C(1) 1.750(2),
S(2)–C(2) 1.755(2), C(1)–Se(1) 1.917(2), C(2)–Se(2) 1.917(2), C(1)–C(2)
1.343(2), C(3)–Se(1) 1.918(2), C(4)–Se(2) 1.922(2), C(3)–C(4) 1.338(2).
1 M. R. Bryce and A. Chesney, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995,
195.
2 (a) H. Fischer, K. Treier, C. Troll and R. Stumpf, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1995, 2461; (b) N. Takeda, N. Tokitoh and R. Okazaki,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 660; (c) S. Yoshida,
M. R. Bryce and A. Chesney, Chem. Commun., 1996, 2375.
3 X. Yang, T. B. Rauchfuss and S. Wilson, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1990, 34.
4 (a) O. Y. Neiland, Y. Y. Katsens and Y. N. Kreitsberga, Z. Org. Chim.,
1989, 25, 592; (b) N. Svenstrup and J. Becher, Synthesis, 1995, 215.
5 G. Steimecke, H.-J. Sieler, R. Kirmse and E. Hoyer, Phosphorus Sulfur,
1979, 7, 49.
Se(1)C(1)C(2)Se(2) moiety forms dihedral angles of 6.5° with
the planar NiS2C2 ring and of 52.8° with the
Se(1)C(3)C(4)Se(2) plane. The ester substituents at C(3) and
C(4) are inclined to the latter plane by 48.5 and 55.3°,
respectively.§ The folding of the diselenine ring in 12 is similar
to that observed in [1,4]diselenino[2,3-b:5,6-bA]di[1]benzo-
selenole (54°) and 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13-dodecahy-
drodicycloocta[1,4]diselenine10 (49°), but larger than in nickel
complexes with isoelectronic 2,3-dithiolato-1,4-dithiine ligands
(28–43°).3,11
In summary, we have devised a short and expedient route to
the 1,2-diselone 8 which has been converted to the 1,4-di-
selenine derivative 9 and hence the nickel complex 12. This
methodology affords a new and efficient approach to the
synthesis of highly-functionalised derivatives of the rare
1,4-diselenine ring system. Further research into the Diels–
Alder trapping of 1,2-diselone intermediate 8, and the down-
stream organic and organometallic reactions of the products
derived therefrom, will be reported in due course.
6
(a) R. M. Olk, A. Ro¨hr, B. Olk and E. Hoyer, Z. Chem., 1988, 28, 304;
(b) H. Poleschner, R. Radeglia and J. Fuchs, J. Organomet. Chem.,
1992, 427, 213; (c) J. Gar´ın, J.Orduna, M. Saviro´n, M. R. Bryce,
A. J. Moore and V. Morisson, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 11063.
7 A. B. Borisenko, M. Broschag, I. Hargittai, T. M. Klapo¨tke,
D. Schro¨der, A. Schulz, H. Schwartz, I. C. Tornieporth-Oetting and
P. S. White, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1994, 2705.
8 J. H. Welch, R. D. Bereman, J. Bordner, W. Hatfield and J. H. Helms,
Inorg. Chem., 1985, 24, 2905.
9 V. P. Litvinov, I. A. Dzhumaev, G. V. Gridunova, V. E. Shklover,
Yu. T. Struchkov and B. M. Zolotarev, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div.
Chem. Sci., 1985, 34, 782.
10 M. R. J. Dorrity, A. Lavery, J. F. Malone, C. P. Morley and
R. R. Vaughan, Heteroatom Chem., 1992, 3, 87; F. R. Fronczek,
H. E. Folsom and P. W. Rabideau, private communication to CCDC,
1995, ref. code PAPKUM01.
We are grateful to the EPSRC for funding this work and to the
Leverhulme Trust for a scholarship (to A. S. B.) and the Royal
Society for a Leverhulme Senior Research Fellowship (to
J. A. K. H.).
11 H. Kim, A. Kobayashi, Y. Sasaki, R. Kato, H. Kobayashi, T. Nakamura,
T. Nogami and Y. Shirota, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1988, 61, 2559.
Received in Cambridge, UK, 12th September 1997; 7/06629E
2294
Chem. Commun., 1997