´
6977
J. Novotny et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 6975–6977
Supplementary data). However, neither long nor short-chain NBD-
Cer penetrated into nucleated epidermal layers (Supplementary
data, Fig. S1). The reason for this discrepancy in NBD-C6-Cer penetra-
tion between Man et al.5 and our study may be the different barrier
properties of mice and human skin. It has been repeatedly shown
that some compounds penetrate in an almost similar manner, others
differ in at least one logarithmic order, the human skin being the less
permeable.22 Human skin has, for example, thicker stratum cor-
neum23 and responds differently to various substances and treat-
ments.24 Moreover, other studies using NBD-C6-Cer also gave
contradictory results suggesting that this effect may be vehicle-
and concentration-dependent. For example, no uptake of NBD-C6-
Cer into hairless mice epidermis from petrolatum was found.25 In
contrast, when using a complex lipid vehicle for 2 h25 and 1.7% solu-
tion in dimethyl sulfoxide, which is actually a potent permeation en-
hancer, for 4 h,26 respectively, the fluorescence was visible in the
viable epidermis.
tration of exogenous NBD-Cer across SC. Although short-chain Cer
are useful experimental tools in many sphingolipid studies, they
cannot be used as general Cer mimics, particularly when considering
Cer effects in lipid membranes, including SC lipid lamellae. Thus, the
mechanism ofaction ofCer inskinbarrierrepair, whichwasbasedon
a behavior of a short-chain Cer, should be reconsidered.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Centre for New Antivirals and
Antineoplastics (1M0508) and the Ministry of Education of the
Czech Republic (MSM0021620822).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures and Fig. S1)
associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
In order to reproduce the above mentioned in vivo results5 and
to be able to distinguish between Cer with various acyl chain
length, the tissue was exposed to approximately three orders-of-
magnitude higher concentration of the lipids for 12 h (Fig. 1, see
Supplementary data for details).
References and notes
1. Imokawa, G.; Abe, A.; Jin, K.; Higaki, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Hidano, A. J. Invest.
Dermatol. 1991, 96, 523.
2. Motta, S.; Monti, M.; Sesana, S.; Mellesi, L.; Ghidoni, R.; Caputo, R. Arch.
Dermatol. 1994, 130, 452.
3. Chamlin, S. L.; Frieden, I. J.; Fowler, A.; Williams, M.; Kao, J.; Sheu, M.; Elias, P.
M. Arch. Dermatol. 2001, 137, 1110.
4. Chamlin, S. L.; Kao, J.; Frieden, I. J.; Sheu, M. Y.; Fowler, A. J.; Fluhr, J. W.;
Williams, M. L.; Elias, P. M. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2002, 47, 198.
5. Man, M. Q.; Feingold, K. R.; Elias, P. M. Arch. Dermatol. 1993, 129, 728.
6. Matsuki, H.; Kiyokane, K.; Matsuki, T.; Sato, S.; Imokawa, G. Exog. Dermatol.
2004, 3, 293.
7. Imokawa, G.; Yada, Y.; Higuchi, K.; Okuda, M.; Ohashi, Y.; Kawamata, A. J. Clin.
Invest. 1994, 94, 89.
8. Takagi, Y.; Nakagawa, H.; Higuchi, K.; Imokawa, G. Dermatology 2005, 211, 128.
9. Vavrova, K.; Hrabalek, A.; Mac-Mary, S.; Humbert, P.; Muret, P. Br. J. Dermatol.
2007, 157, 704.
10. Vavrova, K.; Zbytovska, J.; Palat, K.; Holas, T.; Klimentova, J.; Hrabalek, A.;
Dolezal, P. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2004, 21, 581.
11. Mao-Qiang, M.; Brown, B. E.; Wu-Pong, S.; Feingold, K. R.; Elias, P. M. Arch.
Dermatol. 1995, 131, 809.
12. Elias, P. M. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2005, 125, 183.
13. Feingold, K. R. J. Lipid Res. 2007, 48, 2531.
14. Loden, M. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2005, 19, 672.
15. Goni, F. M.; Alonso, A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1758, 1902.
16. van Blitterswijk, W. J.; van der Luit, A. H.; Veldman, R. J.; Verheij, M.; Borst, J.
Biochem. J. 2003, 369, 199.
17. Novotny, J.; Janusova, B.; Novotny, M.; Hrabalek, A.; Vavrova, K. Skin Pharmacol.
Physiol. 2009, 22, 22.
18. Chong, J. M.; Heuft, M. A.; Rabbat, P. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5837.
19. Klimentova, J.; Kosak, P.; Vavrova, K.; Holas, T.; Hrabalek, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2006, 14, 7681.
20. Müller, S.; Schmidt, R. R. J. Prakt. Chem. 2000, 342, 779.
21. Fabiano, E.; Golding, B. T.; Sadeghi, M. M. Synthesis 1987, 190.
22. Simon, G. A.; Maibach, H. I. Skin Pharmacol. Appl. Skin Physiol. 1998, 11, 80.
23. Bronaugh, R. L.; Stewart, R. F.; Congdon, E. R. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1982, 62,
481.
Under these conditions, fluorescence of the short-chain NBD-
C6-Cer was observed within the viable epidermis in both intact
and acetone-treated skin, which is fully in accordance with Man
et al.5 On the contrary, both lipids with 24 carbons acyl chain
length, that is, NBD-C24-Cer and NBD-14S24, stayed in several
upper SC layers. One experiment was also performed on a non-via-
ble skin to exclude the possibility of Cer metabolism and it yielded
essentially the same results. This suggests that the long-chain lip-
ids (a) display much delayed kinetics compared to NBD-C6-Cer or
(b) they may not be able to reach nucleated epidermis at all.
The reason for the observed chain length dependence in Cer
penetration may be the difference in partitioning and mobility of
the short- and long-chain Cer. The better penetration of shorter
Cer through the lipid membranes may be explained by their smal-
ler molecule and faster exchange between the lipid bilayers. For
example, it has been found that the exchange of natural Cer be-
tween lipid membranes requires days,27 while it takes less than a
minute for short chain, fluorescent Cer to exchange between lipid
vesicles.28 An easier transbilayer movement of C6-Cer compared
to C16-Cer was observed in phospholipid membranes.29 Short-
chain Cer were also found to increase skin permeability.17
Moreover, the long-chain Cer may be too hydrophobic to parti-
tion from SC into a hydrophilic viable epidermis. Indeed, free nat-
ural long-chain Cer cannot exist in solution in biological fluids or in
cytosol. Long-chain Cer stay relatively tightly bound to the mem-
brane where they are generated,30,31 while short Cer can leave
the membrane and translocate to other membranes. Another
example is an elegant study comparing the effects of short- and
long-chain Cer that showed that although exogenous NBD-C6-Cer
taken up via the plasma membrane was converted into glucosylCer
in the Golgi (the same was suggested to occur with exogenous Cer
in the skin11), long-chain Cer generated in the plasma membrane
did not reach the Golgi and thus were not glycosylated.32
24. Bond, J. R.; Barry, B. W. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1988, 90, 810.
25. Silvander, M.; Ringstad, L.; Ghadially, R.; Skold, T. Lipids Health Dis. 2006, 5, 12.
26. Yatvin, M. B.; Stowell, M. H. B. U.S. 6387,876 B1, 2002.
27. Simon, C. G., Jr.; Holloway, P. W.; Gear, A. R. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 14676.
28. Pagano, R. E.; Martin, O. C. Biochemistry 1988, 27, 4439.
29. Shabbits, J. A.; Mayer, L. D. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1612, 98.
30. Venkataraman, K.; Futerman, A. H. Trends Cell. Biol. 2000, 10, 408.
31. Chatelut, M.; Leruth, M.; Harzer, K.; Dagan, A.; Marchesini, S.; Gatt, S.; Salvayre,
R.; Courtoy, P.; Levade, T. FEBS Lett. 1998, 426, 102.
32. Tepper, A. D.; Diks, S. H.; van Blitterswijk, W. J.; Borst, J. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275,
34810.
33. Kuerschner, L.; Ejsing, C. S.; Ekroos, K.; Shevchenko, A.; Anderson, K. I.; Thiele,
C. Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 39.
However, it should be kept in mind that these initial results were
obtained using NBD-labeled lipids and should be confirmed using
more physiological fluorescent Cer, for example, with polyene fluo-
rophores, or radiolabeled lipids (for an excellent comparison and
discussion on these Cer tools, see Refs. 33,34). Nevertheless, these
results clearly showed chain length dependent differences in pene-
34. van Meer, G.; Liskamp, R. M. Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 14.