differences (∆δ values)16 for each protons were obtained.
When the benzhydrol esters are depicted in a manner such
that the two aromatic substituents are in the plane of Table
1 and the carbinyl protons are coming out of the plane, the
protons having positive ∆δ values (written in red) are
invariably on the left side of the CFTA ester plane and those
having negative ∆δ values (written in blue) are on the right
side of the plane. These results are shown in the middle
column of Table 1. From these results, we conclude that our
procedure is consistent even for chiral secondary alcohols
such as these, which have quite subtle structural differences.
To date we have found no exception to this pattern, including
the other chiral alcohols shown as the preliminary data.12
In contrast, the MTPA method of stereochemical assign-
ment gives very inconsistent results for this set of chiral
secondary alcohols, as shown in the right-hand column of
Table 1. For 7 and 8, the ∆δ values for the protons on both
the left and right sides of the MTPA ester plane2,17 are
positive.18 For 9 and 10, some of the proton shifts cannot be
assigned.12 Furthermore, in the case of 11 and 12, the
reliability of the procedure could not be investigated because
the corresponding MTPA derivatives could not be prepared,
presumably as a result of the poor reactivity of MTPA-Cl
(2).4 These results reveal that the modified Mosher’s
procedure1 is not applicable to this series of chiral benzhy-
drols.
structural hypothesis is also supported by the X-ray crystal-
lographic structure of neomenthyl CFTA ester and by the
ab initio calculations on menthyl CFPA ester.13
Steric arguments can be invoked to explain the proposed
sp conformation that we use to rationalize the observed ∆δ
values (Figure 1). To view the diastereomeric CFTA esters
of chiral alcohol (RSRRCHOH)20 from the left side via an
“extended Newman projection”, the intervening ester link-
ages are omitted for convenience. Conformational arguments
are used to explain the algebraic signs of the ∆δ values. In
the (S)-CFTA diastereomer, the shifts of the protons of the
RS substituent that eclipses the p-Tol group should always
be upfield, relative to the shifts in the nonderivatized alcohol,
as a result of the anisotropic shielding of the aromatic ring.
In contrast, for the (R)-diastereomer, the protons of the RR
group are shielded and therefore should appear upfield.
Reinforcing these differences, the CN group induces the
anisotropic deshielding effect21 on the proximate RR and RS
groups in the (S)- and (R)-CFTA diastereomers, respectively.
1
To account for the observed patterns in the H NMR of
CFTA esters, we propose a synperiplanar (sp) F-CR-CO-
O-C-H conformation, as shown by Figure 1. Indeed, there
Figure 2. ∆δH and ∆δD values for CFTA esters of (S)-dR-benzyl
alcohols.
Accordingly, the ∆δ () δS - δR) values for the protons in
the RR group, namely, those for all of the protons on the left
side of the CFTA ester plane, should be positive, and those
(16) The ∆δ values are defined as δS - δR, where δS and δR are the
chemical shifts of the corresponding protons in the (S)- and (R)-CFTA esters,
respectively.
(17) The term “MTPA ester plane” is used in a same manner as the
term “CFTA ester plane”.
(18) (a) Seco, J. M.; Quinoa, E.; Riguera, R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2000, 11, 2781-2791. (b) Kusumi, T.; Fujita, Y.; Ohtani, I.; Kakisawa, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2923-2926. (c) Rieser, M. J.; Hui, Y.;
Rupprecht, J. K.; Kozlowski, J. F.; Wood, K. V.; McLaughlin, J. L.; Hanson,
P. R.; Zhuang, Z.; Hoye, T. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10203-
10213. (d) Duret, P.; Waechter, A.; Figadere, B.; Hocquemiller, R.; Cave,
A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 4717-4720.
(19) (a) Nieminen, J.; Pettersson, M.; Rasanen, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1993,
97, 10925-10936. (b) Durig, J. R.; Phan, H. V.; Hardin, J. A.; Little, T. S.
J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 6840-6851. (c) Amin, M. R.; Harper, D. B.;
Moloney, J. M.; Murphy, C. D.; Howard, J. A. K.; O’Hagan, D. Chem.
Commun. 1997, 1471-1472.
Figure 1. Conformations of (S)- and (R)-CFTA esters of chiral
secondary alcohols RSRRCHOH.
are spectral data and calculations reported that support a sp
F-CR-CO-X conformation as the most stable rotamer, for
a highly conformational preference for various R-fluoro
carbonyl compounds (X ) OMe, OH, Cl, R).14,19 This
(20) In a formula, the “pro-S group R” and the “pro-R group R” are
written as RS and RR, respectively.
(21) Noe, C. R.; Knollmuller, M.; Oberhauser, B.; Steinbauer, G.;
Wagner, E. Chem. Ber. 1986, 119, 729-743.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 24, 2004
4609