H10.1%
tamates 6 (Table 2); molecular modelling studies of each of
these compounds27 indicated that the dihedral angle of the
energy minimised structures also varied with the nature of the
C(4) substituent, particularly for the more sterically congested
C(4)–aryl series of compounds 6a,b. Thus, it would appear that
analogues of well-defined glutamate conformers could be
available by variation in the C(4) substituent of compounds of
type 6.
5.0%
H
H
H
H
H
1.5%
2.8%
H
H
2.3%
H
CO2Me
CO2Me
H
H
CO2Me
H
O
N
H
H
2.4%
O
N
H
CO2Me
3.9%
6a
6b
This route represents a novel and simple, but potentially
generalisable, approach to highly functionalised pyrrolidinones,
and is complementary to existing literature protocols. It in
particular provides access to novel pyroglutamate analogues of
the kainoid group of amino acids possessing substituents with
p-electron density at C(4).
Fig. 1 NOE enhancements for 6a and 6b
In the case of the arylated derivative 3a, acidic deprotection
of the hemiaminal ether function gave the separable dia-
stereomeric alcohols 4a,b in 28 and 52% yield, respectively.
Treatment of 4b with 1 m NaOH in EtOH gave the hydrolysed
and decarboxylated products 4c,d on extraction of the basic
mixture with EtOAc, and a mixture of the acid 4e and product
4c,d on extraction of the aqueous mixture after acidification
with 2 m HCl. Heating of this mixture at 135 °C at 0.8 mBar for
30 min gave the product 4c,d as a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers,
in a combined yield of 82%. Acidic deprotection (TFA–
CH2Cl2) of the tert-butyl ester function of 4c,d and then
oxidation (RuO2, NaIO4, MeCN, CCl4, H2O) afforded the acid
5 [as a mixture of diastereomers at C(4)] which was partially
purified using base wash and then treated with MeOH–H2SO4
(catalytic) giving the diesters 6a and 6b each in 33% yield (from
4c,d), whose relative stereochemistry was determined by NOE
experiments (Fig. 1). An alternative route to 6a,b, which
involved treatment of 3a with 2 m NaOH–EtOH at 50 °C for 5
h to give concomitant ethyl ester hydrolysis, decarboxylation
and tert-butyl ester hydrolysis, was limited by incomplete and
variable hydrolysis of the ester functions, leading to impure
7a,b.
We thank the EPSRC and GlaxoWellcome for funding of a
studentship to J. D., and we gratefully acknowledge the use of
the EPSRC Chemical Database Service at Daresbury28 and the
EPSRC National Mass Spectrometric Service Centre at Swan-
sea.
Note and References
† E-mail: mark.moloney@chem.ox.ac.uk
1 A. O. Plunkett, Nat. Prod. Rep., 1994, 11, 581.
2 M. S. Chorghade and C. Csehe, Pure Appl. Chem., 1994, 2211.
3 G. Massiot and C. Delaude, The Alkaloids, 1986, 27, 300.
4 J. S. Sabol, G. A. Flynn, D. Friedrich and E. W. Huber, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1997, 38, 3687.
5 D. T. Monaghan and R. J. Wenthold, Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors,
Humana, Totowa (New Jersey), 1997.
6 B. S. Meldrum, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Blackwell
Scientific, Oxford, 1991.
The benzyl derivative 3e was also amenable to similar
manipulation. Thus, hemiaminal ether cleavage of each of the
benzyl diastereomers of 3e (TFA in CH2Cl2) afforded the
products 4f,g. Hydrolysis (NaOH–EtOH) of 4f gave 4h in 99%
crude yield, which after heating to effect decarboxylation, and
then tert-butyl ester removal, oxidation (RuO2, NaIO4, MeCN,
CCl4, H2O) and esterification (CH2N2) provided the separable
diastereomeric benzyl derivatives 6c,d in a ratio of 1:4.4 and
38% overall yield. An alternative path, involving hydrolysis of
4g, followed by direct tert-butyl ester removal, oxidation, and
esterification using the above conditions gave a 1:1 mixture of
products 6e,f, indicating that the initial hydrolyis was in-
complete.
Pyrrolidinones which were unfunctionalised at C(4) were
also available by this route. Thus, direct decarboxylation of the
starting lactam 2, by treatment with ethanolic NaOH followed
by thermolysis and deprotection with TFA, afforded 4i in 33%
yield, a compound which has been previously reported in the
literature.25 Conversion to lactam 6h was achieved by tert-butyl
ester removal, oxidation as before and esterification (CH2N2) in
53% yield over the three steps.
7 D. Lodge, Excitatory Amino Acids in Health and Disease, Wiley-
Interscience, Chichester, 1988.
8 A. Guidotti, Neurotoxicity of Excitatory Amino Acids, Raven Press, New
York, 1990.
9 M. G. Moloney, Nat. Prod. Rep., 1998, in the press.
10 A. F. Parsons, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 4149.
11 T. Harrison, Contemp. Org. Synth., 1996, 259.
12 M. Horikawa, Y. Shima, K. Hashimoto and H. Shirahama, Hetero-
cycles, 1995, 40, 1009.
13 M. Horikawa and H. Shirahama, Synlett., 1996, 95.
14 J. E. Baldwin, A. M. Fryer, M. R. Spyvee, R. C. Whitehead and
M. E. Wood, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 6923.
15 J. E. Baldwin, S. J. Bamford, A. M. Fryer and M. E. Wood, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1995, 36, 4869.
16 J. E. Baldwin and M. Rudolph, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 6163.
17 M. Bamford, M. Beard, D. T. Cherry and M. G. Moloney, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 1995, 6, 337.
18 J. H. Bailey, D. T. Cherry, K. M. Crapnell, M. G. Moloney, S. B. Shim,
M. Bamford and R. B. Lamont, Tetrahedron, 1997, 11731.
19 J. Dyer, S. Keeling and M. G. Moloney, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37,
4573.
20 A. Diaz, J. G. Siro, J. L. Garcia-Navio, J. J. Vaquero and J. Alvarez-
Builla, Synthesis, 1997, 559.
21 J. T. Pinhey, in Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II, ed. A.
McKillop, Pergamon, Oxford, 1995, vol. 11.
Noteworthy was variation of the C(2)–H/C(3)–H vicinal
proton coupling constants for each of the substituted pyroglu-
22 J. T. Pinhey, Aust. J. Chem., 1991, 44, 1353.
23 All new compounds gave satisfactory spectroscopic and/or high
resolution mass spectrometric or analytical data.
24 M. J. Beard, J. H. Bailey, D. T. Cherry, M. G. Moloney, S. B. Shim,
K. Statham, M. Bamford and R. B. Lamont, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52,
3719.
Table
2 Proton–proton C(2)–H/C(3)–H coupling constant data and
corresponding dihedral angles
J/Hza
25 T. Sato, K. Matsubayashi, K. Yamamoto, H. Ishikawa, H. Ishibashi and
M. Ikeda, Heterocycles, 1995, 40, 261.
26 Structures optimised with CACHE Scientific Worksystem Version 3.9,
available from Oxford Molecular Group (Medawar Centre, Oxford
Science Centre, Oxford, UK) (Augmented MM2 Parameters using
Conjugate Gradient Optimisation Method).
Dihedral
Compound
angle (°)b
6h
6a
6b
6c
6d
5.5 (5.5)
6.5 (6.5)
8.0 (8.0)
2.5 (2.5)
6.0 (6.5)
117
121
153
125
118
27 D. A. Fletcher, R. F. McMeeking and D. Parkin, J. Chem. Inf. Comput.
Sci., 1996, 36, 746.
a In CDCl3 (in C6D6). b Ref. 27.
Received in Liverpool, UK, 21st November 1997; 7/08429C
462
Chem. Commun., 1998