Hydride Reduction of NAD+ Analogues by Isopropyl Alcohol
H
transfer step, the corresponding secondary KIEOD (1.07) is
of the positive charge developing in the T.S. The O-D isotope
effect (resulting from the direct conjugation effect) on the
hydride-transfer process is expected to be greater than the
ꢀ-C-D isotope effect (resulting from the hyperconjugation
effect). This seems to be the case, at least in our systems. Note
masked by the EIE (2.67) of the side-equilibrium in the overall
obs
KIE of the reaction (KIEOD ) KIEODH/EIE).
X + H+ y z XH+ slow8 products
(5)
rapid
H
that the KIEꢀ-D6 values obtained in this work are a result of
the cumulative effect of six ꢀ-C-D bonds.
H
The EIE and KIEOD can be explained in terms of fraction-
One feature of interest is the rate reduction of the MA+
reaction (∼1.4-fold) when the cosolvent was changed from water
(4.7%) to AN (entries 1-14 vs 1-15). When AN was increased
to 50% (v/v), accompanied with a 2-fold decrease in the alcohol
concentration, the rate of the reaction decreased by as large as
5.3-fold (entries 1-10 vs 1-13). Furthermore, in AN without
i-PrOH as cosolvent, for example, [i-PrOH] ) 0.04 M in AN,
no reaction was observed over a period of days. This strongly
suggests that the protic solvents, either i-PrOH or water, strongly
stabilize the T.S. of the hydride-transfer process through
H-bonding interactions with partial positively charged H of the
alcohol moiety (Scheme 1). on the OH group of the alcohol
moiety is highly developed in the T.S. Such a late T.S. is
ation factors (ꢁ) for deuterium between ROH and ROH2+ sites
and between ROH and its hydride-transfer T.S. R
OHδ+
sites, respectively.28 In these systems, ꢁ can be defined to be
the D/H ratio in positively charged OL+ or OLδ+ bonds (L )
H or D) divided by the D/H ratio in neutral OL bonds, i.e., ꢁ
28,29
+
) (D/H)OL /(D/H)OL
.
A ꢁ ) 0.69, determined for the
hydronium ion in aqueous solution, has been commonly assigned
to all positively charged OL+ bonds.28,29 The less than unity ꢁ
value suggests a weaker O-L+ bond than is an O-L bond. It
also means that, in a deuterated solvent at room temperature,
D has only 69% preference compared with H in the undeuterated
solvent for placement in OL+. In another sense, it also reflects
that H2O (or ROH) is a stronger base than is D2O (or ROD).
Thus, considering the equilibrium PhXn+ + 2 i-PrOL S
PhXnOPr-i + i-PrOL2+, and assuming that D and H have equal
opportunity of being in i-PrOL, the EIE (K(i-PrOH)/K(i-PrOD))
of the equilibrium can be estimated to be 12/(0.69)2 ) 2.1, not
far from the value of 2.67 determined from this work. Note
that in our equilibrium system L+ may exist in a form other
than i-PrOL2+, e.g. (i-PrOL)nL+, plus our experimental condi-
tions (60 °C in i-PrOH/AN (v/v ) 1)) are different from those
used to obtain the 0.69 value, a quantitative comparison between
the two EIE values (2.1 and 2.67) may thus be meaningless.
H
consistent with the observed small primary KIER-D (2.1) for
the reaction of MA+ and the relatively small normal secondary
H
H
KIEꢀ-D6 ) 1.5 for the same reaction as well as KIEꢀ-D6
)
1.1 for the reaction of PhXn+. Note that a ꢀ-secondary KIE as
large as 3.5 has been observed in the oxidation of isopropyl
alcohol by a ruthenium(IV) complex.21a
SCHEME 1. Proposed Hydride Transfer T.S. Stabilized by
i-PrOH through H-Bonding
H
Nevertheless, our larger than unity EIE and KIEOD values
correspond with the equilibrium process from OL to OL+ and
the activation process from OL to [OLδ+]q, respectively. Also,
that KIEODH is masked by EIE in the overall KIE of the reaction
may be relevant to the fact that the O-L bond in [OLδ+ q
]
(carrying a partial positive charge) is stronger than that in OL+
(bearing a full positive charge). Importantly, to the best of our
knowledge, this is the first observation of KIEODH in the hydride-
transfer reaction involving alcohols as hydride donors. It is
highly likely that the KIEOD should also be observed in other
types of reactions in which the T.S.’s contain a center of partial
positive charge R to a hydroxyl group.
This T.S. structural pattern can be used to understand the
unexpected relatively small rate ratio for the hydride-transfer
reaction of PhXn+ and MA+ (e.g., ∼1.8 × 103 in i-PrOH/AN
30
(v/v)1) at 69 °C), in spite of the large (∼13 kcal/mol
)
difference in thermodynamic stability of the two cations.
Differences in the degree of H-bonding stabilization effect on
the T.S.’s most likely diminish the difference in T.S. energies
for the two hydride-transfer processes. This is interestingly quite
consistent with the facile biological NAD+ oxidation of alcohols
where alcohol hydroxyl hydrogen apparently interacts favorably
in the T.S. by H-bonding with the hydroxyl oxygen of an amino
acid residue (e.g., serine) in the active site of alcohol
dehydrogenases.1b,2 Our results reflect the significance of the
kind of base catalysis in lowering the T.S. energy of the
biological hydride-transfer processes.
H
H
The observed KIEꢀ-D6 and KIEOD are worthy of further
comment. The results show that both ꢀ-C-D and O-D
connected to the R-C of the alcohol exert isotope effects on the
rate of the hydride transfer from R-C-H to the cations. The
former is a result of a hyperconjugation effect involving the
σ orbital of the ꢀ-C-H bond and the p/or π orbital of the
R-C
OH group where a partial positive charge is developing
in the T.S., altering the ꢀ-C-H bond vibration frequency. The
latter is a result of direct resonance effect involving a partial
positive charge being delocalized onto the O-H group of the
It should be mentioned that the hydride reduction of an NAD+
model BNA+ (1, R1 ) benzyl, R2 ) CONH2) by alkyl alcohols
including i-PrOH catalyzed by various Zn(II) complexes has
been studied and found to be inefficient.7,11,12 The addition of
the Zn(II) complexes was meant to imitate the complexed zinc
environment in the active site of the alcohol dehydrogenases.
T.S. through the C
O bond formation, affecting the vibration
frequency of the O-H bond in it. Both effects are a consequence
(26) (a) Bunton, C. A.; Shiner, V. J., Jr J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 42–47.
(b) Bunton, C. A.; Shiner, V. J., Jr J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 3207–3214, and
references cited therein.
(27) Bunton, C. A.; Shiner, V. J., Jr J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 3214–
3220.
(30) In addition to using the hydride affinity values of the two cations from
ref 17, the stability difference of the two cations can also be estimated from
their pKR+ values: pKR+(PhXn+) ) 0.81: Arnett, E. M.; Flowers, R. A.; Lundwig,
R. T.; Meekhof, A. E.; Ealek, S. A. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1997, 10, 499-513,
and pKR+(MA+) ) 10.1: Bunting, J. W.; Chew, V. S. F.; Abhyankar, S. B.;
Goda, Y. Can. J. Chem. 1984, 62, 351-354.
(28) Alvarez, R.; Schowen, R. T. Isotopes in Organic Chemistry; Elsevier:
New York, 1987; Vol. 7, Chapter 1, and references cited therein.
(29) Arrowsmith, C. H.; Guo, H.-X.; Kresge, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 8890–8894.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 13, 2008 4769