such as DMF and triethylamine but such solvent effects are not
observed for 2b and 2c.
(a)
1c
At the present stage, it seems difficult to identify the main
reason for this CS inhibition by F2 coordination. The energy
levels of the ion-pair states, geometrical parameters, and
electronic coupling should be changed upon F2 coordination.
Since the addition of TBAF had almost no effect on the redox
potentials of these models,8 the energy levels of the ion-pair
states do not change significantly, at least in polar DMF
solution, but are more difficult to estimate in nonpolar benzene
solution. Since the center-to-center distance between ZP and the
boron is estimated to be longer than that between the boron and
the diimide,9 the negative charge at the boron may raise the
energy level of the ion-pair state, thereby decreasing the kCS
value. A change from a neutral trigonal boron to a tetrahedral
‘ate’ anion induces a slight shortening of the donor–acceptor
distance by 0.4 Å as well as changes in the molecular orbitals of
the bridge that will alter the electronic coupling between ZP and
the diimide acceptor, relevant for CS. The former structural
change seems to be unimportant since comparable kCS rates
were observed for the structural analogues, 2b and 2c. The latter
effect, which may be evaluated by considering the molecular
orbitals of the phenylboronate 9, causes a considerable increase
in the LUMO energy of the bridge upon F2 coordination,10
suggesting the decreased electronic coupling due to the high
LUMO energy to be critical in the observed CS inhibition.
Coordination on a neutral bridging boron may provide a
convenient method of controlling the intramolecular ET. The
generality of this method will be tested in other ET systems and
also in triplet–triplet energy transfer systems. Studies in this
direction are ongoing and will be reported soon elsewhere.
This work was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for
Scientific Research (No. 09440217) from the Ministry of
Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan and by CREST
(Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology) of
Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST).
–
1c + F
(b)
A
2c
–
2c + F
400
500
600
700
800
wavelength / nm
Fig. 1 Transient absorption spectra of 1c (a) and 2c (b) in benzene, at a delay
time of 6 ns. Solid lines: in the absence of F2; dotted lines: in the presence
of 1.2 equiv. F2.
1.0
0.8
1b
1c
2b
2c
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Notes and References
† E-mail: osuka@kuchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp
1 M. R. Wasielewski, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 435, and references
therein.
2 H. M. McConnell, J. Chem. Phys., 1961, 35, 508; S. Lasson, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 4034; M. N. Paddon-Row, Acc. Chem. Res.,
1994, 27, 18, and references therein.
0
1
2
3
4
5
F– / equiv.
Fig. 2 Change of fluorescence intensities of diimide-linked models upon
addition of F2. Data for 1b,c and 2b,c were recorded relative to 1a and 2a,
respectively. Concentrations of models were 1 µm.
3 H. Toi, Y. Nagai, Y. Aoyama, H. Kawabe, K. Aizawa and H. Ogoshi,
Chem. Lett., 1993, 1043.
4 M. Takeuchi, Y. Chin, T. Imada and S. Shinkai, Chem. Commun., 1996,
1867.
boron atom. Similar shifts were observed for 1b and 1c. Fig. 2
shows the effects of TBAF addition on the fluorescence
intensities of 1b,c and 2b,c. It is evident that the fluorescence
intensity of 1c increased with increasing amount of TBAF and
returned to the original unquenched level with ca. 1 equiv. of
TBAF, while the fluorescence intensity of 2c remained
quenched to a constant level up to 5 equiv. of TBAF added.
Essentially the same trend was observed for 1b and 2b. Upon
addition of 5 equiv. TBAF, the short fluorescence lifetimes of
free 1b and 1c were restored to the unquenched levels (1.56 and
1.57 ns, respectively), which are almost the same as that (1.58
ns) of the acceptor-free reference compound 1a under the same
conditions. In contrast to the ET reactions of 2b and 2c, which
are rather independent of TBAF [Fig. 1(b)], the transient
absorption spectra of 1b and 1c in the presence of 1.2 equiv.
TBAF are practically the same as those of the acceptor-free 1c
with no indication of ion-pair formation [Fig. 1(a), dotted line].7
Therefore it is concluded that the CS reactions in 1b and 1c are
completely blocked by F2 coordination. Since restoring the
initial ET activities of 1b and 1c after the addition of F2 is
important for constructing a real ON/OFF system, the addition
of a large amount of 9 to solutions of F2-complexed 1b and 1c
was examined but did not lead to the recovery of the ET
activities. Finally, note that the CS reactions in 1b and 1c are
also completely blocked in solvents with high donor numbers
5 A. Osuka, S. Nakajima, K. Maruyama, N. Mataga, T. Asahi, I.
Yamazaki, Y. Nishimura, T. Ohno and K. Nozaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1993, 115, 4577; A. Osuka, R.-P. Zhang, K. Maruyama, N. Mataga, Y.
Tanaka and T. Okada, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1993, 215, 179.
6 This biphasic decay behavior may be accounted for by considering the
singlet–triplet intersystem crossing within the ion-pair since the rate of
charge recombination is comparable to the rate of the singlet–triplet
intersystem crossing of the ion-pair state. W. Udo, Y. Sakaguchi, H.
Hayashi, G. Nohya, R. Yoneshima, S. Nakajima and A. Osuka, J. Phys.
Chem., 1995, 99, 13930.
7 The transient absorption spectra indicate that the S1 state of the ZP does
not undergo any ET and is converted to the T1 state absorbing at 455
nm.
8 The one-electron redox potentials of the donor and the acceptor moieties
have been measured in DMF by cyclic voltammetry: Eox(ZP) = 0.22,
E
red(PI) = 21.24 and Eox(NI) = 20.98 V for 1a–c, and Eox(ZP) =
0.22, Ered(PI) = 21.18 and Ered(NI) = 20.94 V for 2a–c vs. ferrocene–
ferrocenium ion.
9 Estimated distance between the ZP and the boron is 9.4 Å and those
between the boron and the diimide are 7.6 and 7.8 Å in 1b and 1c,
respectively.
10 MO calculations were performed using MacSpartan Plus (ab initio,
3-21G basis set). Calculated LUMO energies are 3.4, 8.2, and 4.1 eV for
neutral 9, F2-coordinated 9, and an acetal reference bridge, re-
spectively.
Received in Cambridge, UK, 1st April 1998; 8/02473A
1540
Chem. Commun., 1998