Z. Zhang et al.
Carbohydrate Polymers 252 (2021) 117134
and the obtained suspension filtered and washed with pure water and
subjected to high pressure homogenization 20 times to obtain a uniform
tCNF suspension. The main ingredients of tCNF were cellulose (81.81 %)
and hemicelluloses (14.94 %), with a small amount of lignin (0.78%).
Further, the surface charge (ꢀ 1.59 × 10ꢀ 3 eq/g) of tCNF was deter-
mined using a colloidal charge titrator.
(Fig. S2). For Nd-nanopaper, the absorption peak at 1620 cmꢀ 1 was due
–
to stretching vibrations of tCNF carboxyl (C O) groups. The peak at
–
1620 cmꢀ 1 was red-shifted by 20 cmꢀ 1 compared to pure tCNF (nano-
paper), which was attributed to coordination of carboxyl groups and
lanthanide ions and suggested coupling reactions between tCNF and Nd-
MOFs. Therefore, FT-IR results demonstrated that Nd-MOFs had been
coordinate-bonded with tCNF, resulting in the formation of Nd-
nanopaper. By analyzing FT-IR spectra of Nd-nanopaper@FB, the
2.4. Preparation of Nd-MOFs-grafted-nanopaper
broad band at 3412 cmꢀ 1 was assigned to O H stretching vibrations
–
and the band at 1616 cmꢀ 1 to COOꢀ stretching (Fig. S3). Furthermore,
A mixture of NdCl3⋅6H2O (0.06 mmol), 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic
acid (H3BTC, 0.02 mmol), tCNF (2.5 mL), and deionized water (10
mL) were evenly added to a sealed vial. The reaction vessel was heated
the peak located at 1350 cmꢀ 1 was assigned to stretching vibrations of
ꢀ 1
–
–
C
H and the band at 1028 cm to O H in-plane bending vibrations.
◦
These results were basically consistent with the position of absorption
peaks of Nd-nanopaper IR spectra. Therefore, the addition of fluorescent
brightener was just impregnation into the nanopaper without chemical
reaction and new bond formation. It also did not affect peak positions in
the present Nd-nanopaper IR spectrum.
at 105 C for 3 h and the resulting suspension filtered to prepare Nd-
MOFs-grafted-nanopaper (Nd-nanopaper) using Buchner funnel
filtering. Then, the Nd-nanopaper was peeled off the filter, pressed be-
tween smooth glass plates, and allowed to dry naturally at ambient at-
mosphere for 24 h.
The dispersion uniformity of fluorescent brighteners in nanopaper is
particularly important, because it determines the luminescence unifor-
mity. Laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) images showed that
fluorescent dots distribution was relative uniform (Fig. S4), indicating
that fluorescent brighteners were evenly distributed in the nanopaper.
As the fluorescent brighteners were just associated in the Nd-nanopaper
without any chemical reaction, therefore, its concentration in the
nanopaper was determined via an external standard method. The
absorbance curves at 5 different concentrations for each fluorescent
brightener and standard curves of 7 kinds of fluorescent brighteners
were obtained (Fig. S5). A 2.1 mg mass of Nd-nanopaper@FB was
dispersed into 9 mL of solvent (Nd-nanopaper@FB1-6 DMF and Nd-
nanopaper@FB7 H2O) and their maximum absorbance measured. The
fluorescent brightener content in the Nd-nanopaper@FB was calculated
using the equation y = ax + b, where y is the absorbance and x the mass
concentration. The coordinates of mass concentration and absorbance of
the fluorescent brighteners were also noted and the mass concentration
and absorbance of the seven Nd-nanopaper@FB nanopapers showed
corresponding coordinates of Nd-nanopaper@FB1-(0.076, 0.89), Nd-
nanopaper@FB2-(0.091, 0.72), Nd-nanopaper@FB3-(0.073, 0.85), Nd-
nanopaper@FB4-(0.098, 0.95), Nd-nanopaper@FB5-(0.088, 0.76), Nd-
nanopaper@FB6-(0.070, 0.87), and Nd-nanopaper@FB7-(0.118, 0.89).
For Nd-nanopapers, the homogeneous distribution of Nd-MOFs on
the tCNF matrix played an important role in material photophysical
properties. Images showed that Nd-MOF possessed tiny purple crystal
particles with beautiful crystal clear luster (Fig. S6a). Further, the
morphologies of Nd-MOFs was captured by scanning electron micro-
scopic (SEM) images (Figs. S6b-S6c). Nd-MOFs were clearly seen to be
2.5. Preparation of Nd-nanopaper encapsulated fluorescent brighteners
Based on the Nd-nanopapers described above, a series of Nd-
nanopaper encapsulated fluorescent brighteners (Nd-nanopaper@FB)
were prepared using a similar method. The fluorescent brighteners were
1,1’-biphenyl-4,4’-bis[2-(methoxyphenyl)ethenyl] (FB-1), 4.4-bis(5-
methyl-2-benzoxoazol)-ethylene (FB-2), 1,4-bis(benziazolyl-2-yl-)naph-
thalene (FB-3), 4,4’-(2-sulfostyryl)biphenyl disodium (FB-4), 4,4’-bis(2-
benzoxazolyl)-stilbene (FB-5), 4,4’-(1,4-phenylenebis(ethene-2,1-dlyl))
(FB-6), and 2,5-bis(5-tert-butyl-benzoxazol-2-yl)thiophene (FB-7). A
mixture of NdCl3⋅6H2O (0.06 mmol), H3BTC (0.1 mmol), tCNF (2.5 mL),
and deionized water (10 mL) was well mixed in a sealed vial. Then, 4.26
mg of fluorescent brighteners were dissolved in DMF (1 mL) and added
to the above solution. Finally, the reaction vessel was heated at 105 ◦C
for 3 h, the aqueous suspension filtered to prepare Nd-nanopaper using
Buchner funnel filtering, and the product washed three times with
alternating water and ethanol. Then, the Nd-nanopaper@FB was peeled
off, pressed between smooth glass plates, and allowed to dry naturally at
ambient atmosphere for 24 h.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Preparation and characterization of Nd-nanopaper and Nd-
nanopaper@FB
The tCNF was prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidization of NBKP.
Subsequently, Nd-MOFs were assembled on tCNF surfaces via coordi-
nate bonding and then Nd-nanopaper produced by filtering with a
Buchner funnel. Wide-angle powder X-ray diffractometric analysis
(PXRD) was performed on Nd-MOFs, pristine nanopaper, and Nd-
nanopaper. The resulting XRD patterns showed Nd-MOFs with sharp
peaks present at 10.12, 16.8, 17.3, 29.2, and 33.8◦, which indicated a
crystalline material (Fig. 1S). In their PXRD patterns, pristine nano-
papers showed peaks at 15.6 (11‾0) and 22.8◦ (002), which were
attributed to the crystalline structure of tCNF (Lin & Dufresne, 2014).
Nd-nanopapers showed the prominent peaks at 15.6, 22.8, 29.2, and
33.8◦, illustrating that Nd-nanopapers were composed of a combination
of Nd-MOFs and pristine nanopaper. The crystallinity index of pristine
(67%) and Nd-nanopapers (51 %) were calculated using the equation Ic
= 1- I1/I2, where I1 is the amorphous region diffraction intensity 2θ =
18◦ and I2 the intensity at 2θ = 22.8◦, related to the ordered (crystalline)
area of tCNF (Abraham et al., 2016). These results indicated that the
obtained Nd-MOFs were successfully combined with tCNF (Missoum,
Bras, & Belgacem, 2012) and, by virtue of Nd-MOFs binding occurring
solely at tCNF surfaces, tCNF crystalline structure was preserved.
FT-IR spectra of Nd-nanopaper, Nd-MOFs, and nanopaper demon-
strated characteristic signal peaks at 3341 and 2901 cmꢀ 1, which were
attributed to stretching vibrations of -OH groups and C-H, respectively
rod-shaped, with 1–8 μm diameter and 15–90 μm length. Due to the
influence of nano-size effects of tCNFs, there were no large-sized Nd-
MOFs particles in Nd-nanopaper. As expected, Nd-nanopaper appeared
dense and its surface smooth, which was similar to nanopaper (Fig. 2a
and b). To our best knowledge, cellulose density was packed to form a
layer-like structure and then layers connected by hydrogen bonds within
the nanopaper. Through cross-sectional analysis, the layers between
nanopaper and Nd-nanopaper sections were found to be very compact,
with Nd-nanopaper sections appearing a little rougher than nanopaper,
which might be attributed to Nd-MOF grafted tCNFs destroying
hydrogen bonds and affecting its layered structure (Fig. 2c and d).
The elemental composition of Nd-MOFs and Nd-nanopaper was
determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. The
XPS spectra of Nd-MOFs and Nd-nanopaper illustrated that Nd-MOFs
and Nd-nanopaper had similar compositions, primarily of C, O, and
Nd (Table 1, Fig. 3a). The high-resolution XPS spectrum of C-1s
exhibited five peaks at about 282.5, 282.8, 283.1, 284.2, and 286.6 eV,
–
–
–
–
– – – –
C O, and O C O,
which were attributed to C C, C C, C O, O
–
respectively (Fig. 3b, Wang et al., 2014; Zor, Alpaydin, Arici, Saglam, &
Bingol, 2017). The analysis of O-1s illustrated that oxygen was divided
–
–
C
into two peaks at 527.95 eV for O Nd bonds and 529.25 eV for O
3