6088
J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6088-6089
remains within 15 kJ /mol of the energy minimum. Methyl-
alkene moieties are abundant in terpenes and polypropi-
onate natural products and have indeed been shown to serve
as surrogates of backbone amide functions in enzyme-
inhibitor complexes.6
Meth yl- a n d (Tr iflu or om eth yl)a lk en e P ep tid e
Isoster es: Syn th esis a n d Eva lu a tion of Th eir
P oten tia l a s â-Tu r n P r om oter s a n d P ep tid e
Mim etics
Peter Wipf,* Todd C. Henninger, and Steven J . Geib
Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
Received J une 3, 1998
Despite the promise of amide bond isosteres for improving
the resistance toward degradation by exoproteases by sev-
eral orders of magnitude, the use of nonhydrolyzable sub-
stitutes for the amide group has often led to disappointing
decreases in biological activity.1 The frequent lack of success
with ground-state amide bond mimetics stands in contrast
to the very promising use of hydroxyethylene protease
inhibitors as mimics of the tetrahedral intermediate in
amide bond hydrolysis.2 Nonetheless, the development of
effective amide bond isosteres holds considerable promise
as a stepping stone toward the rational design of small
molecule analogues of bioactive oligo- and polypeptides.
Analogues such as thiomethylene and aminomethylene
isosteres, however, exchange the conformationally restricted
amide function with highly flexible single bonds. Disubsti-
tuted (E)-alkene isosteres 1 provide a better fit for the Ci-
(R)-Ci+1(R) distance (3.8 Å) but are inadequate mimetics of
the electrostatic potential surface as well as the backbone
φ,ψ-dihedral angles. Gellman and co-workers designed the
tetrasubstituted (E)-alkene Gly-Gly dipeptide mimetic 2 to
induce conformational rigidification and promote â-hairpin
formation.3 More recently, Hoffman and co-workers re-
ported the use of gauche pentane interactions for the design
of â-hairpin analogue 3.4 We were interested in exploring
the use of trisubstituted (E)-alkene isosteres such as 4 as
â-turn mimetics. A combination of A1,3- and A1,2-strain leads
to considerable restrictions in φ,ψ-dihedral angles in these
substrates, and the Ramachandran plot of the methylalkene
isostere of alanine is closely related to the parent amino
acid.5 In contrast, the disubstituted (E)-alkene analogue is
conformationally much more flexible. Even greater steric
restrictions are observed for a trifluoromethylated derivative
5 where only ca. 15% of the Ramachandran plot area
The mimicry of the electronic properties of the amide bond
represents perhaps the most challenging parameter for
effective isostere design. Electrostatically, the (trifluoro-
methyl)alkene represents a better match of the amide bond
than any other common alkene isostere (Figure 1).
Efficient synthetic approaches toward diastereomerically
and enantiomerically pure alkene peptide isosteres are
under intense investigation.8 A particularly promising
convergent pathway utilizes the SN2′-addition of cuprate
reagents to alkenyl aziridines and allylic mesylates.9 The
former approach has also been applied to solid-phase
synthesis.10 We have now extended these methods toward
a general synthesis of methyl- and (trifluoromethyl)alkene
isosteres and, for the first time, systematically compared the
solid state conformations of these peptide mimetics.
Swern oxidation of the epoxy alcohol 6, obtained in 92%
ee by Sharpless epoxidation,11 followed by Wittig chain
extension and epoxide-aziridine conversion,12 provided alk-
enyl aziridine 7 in 13% overall yield (Scheme 1). N-
Acylation, copper(I)-catalyzed SN2′-addition,9 and aminoly-
sis13 gave the D-Ala-L-Ala isostere 9 in 28% yield.
A modified strategy was necessary for the preparation of
(trifluoromethyl)alkene 14 (Scheme 2). Carboxylation14 of
trifluorotrichloroethane 10, esterification with benzyl alco-
hol, and Reformatzky addition-elimination15 with acetal-
dehyde yielded the trifluoroalkene 11 as a 2:3 mixture of
(E)- and (Z)-isomers. The (Z)-isomer was isolated by column
chromatography on SiO2 and subjected to a Sharpless
asymmetric dihydroxylation.16 The resulting diol was ob-
tained in 73% ee and converted to the epoxide under
Mitsunobu conditions. Reduction to the aldehyde and Wittig
chain extension provided alkenyl oxirane 12. After sodium
azide opening, the resulting azido alcohol could not be
(1) See, for example: (a) Fincham, C. I.; Higginbottom, M.; Hill, D. R.;
Horwell, D. C.; O’Toole, J . C.; Ratcliffe, G. S.; Rees, D. C.; Roberts, E. J .
Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 1472. (b) Kaltenbronn, J . S.; Hudspeth, J . P.; Lunney,
E. A.; Michniewicz, B. M.; Nicolaides, E. D.; Repine, J . T.; Roark, W. H.;
Stier, M. A.; Tinney, F. J .; Woo, P. K. W.; Essenburg, A. D. J . Med. Chem.
1990, 33, 838. (c) Wai, J . S.; Bamberger, D. L.; Fisher, T. E.; Graham, S.
L.; Smith, R. L.; Gibbs, J . B.; Mosser, S. D.; Oliff, A. I.; Pompliano, D. L.;
Rands, E.; Kohl, N. E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1994, 2, 939.
(2) Vacca, J . P.; Condra, J . H. Drug Discov. 1997, 2, 261.
(3) Gardner, R. R.; Liang, G.-B.; Gellman, S. H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 3280.
(4) Schopfer, U.; Stahl, M.; Brandl, T.; Hoffmann, R. W. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1745.
(5) Ramachandran plots were obtained with Macromodel 5.5 using the
MM2 force field. See the Supporting Information.
(9) (a) Wipf, P.; Fritch, P. C. J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4875. (b) Ibuka, T.;
Nakai, K.; Habashita, H.; Hotta, Y.; Fujii, N.; Mimura, N.; Miwa, Y.; Taga,
T.; Yamamoto, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 652. (c) Ibuka, T.;
Habashita, H.; Funakoshi, S.; Fuji, N.; Oguchi, Y.; Uyehara, T.; Yamamoto,
Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 801.
(10) Wipf, P.; Henninger, T. J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1586.
(11) Gao, Y.; Hanson, R. M.; Klunder, J . M.; Ko, S. Y.; Masamune, H.;
Sharpless, K. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5765.
(6) See, for example: Ikeda, Y.; Schultz, L. W.; Clardy, J .; Schreiber, S.
L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4143.
(7) Calculated dipole moments were obtained with Spartan 5.0.1 (Wave-
function, Inc.) and AM1 semiempirical parametrization.
(12) (a) Ittah, Y.; Sasson, Y.; Shahak, I.; Tsaroom, S.; Blum, J . J . Org.
Chem. 1978, 43, 4271. (b) Wipf, P.; Venkatraman, S.; Miller, C. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3639.
(13) Hoegberg, T.; Stroem, P.; Ebner, M.; Raemsby, S. J . Org. Chem.
1987, 52, 2033.
(14) A modification of the procedure used by Fujita and Kiyama (Fujita,
M.; Hiyama, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn. 1987, 60, 4377) was used. The yield
was improved from 18% to 50%.
(15) Allmendinger, T.; Lang, R. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 339.
(16) Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem. Rev.
1994, 94, 2483.
(8) For some recent examples, see: (a) Kranz, M.; Kessler, H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1996, 37, 5359. (b) Devadder, S.; Verheyden, P.; J aspers, H. C. M.;
Van Binst, G.; Tourwe´, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 703. (c) Welch, J . T.;
Lin, J . Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 291. (d) Ibuka, T.; Akaji, M.; Mimura, N.;
Habashita, H.; Nakai, K.; Tamamura, H.; Fujii, N.; Yamamoto, Y. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2849. (e) Daly, M. J .; Ward, R. A.; Thompson, D. F.;
Procter, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 7545. (f) Wai, J . S.; Fisher, T. E.;
Embrey, M. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3461. (g) Bartlett, P. A.; Otake,
A. J . Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 3107.
S0022-3263(98)01057-3 CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/14/1998